Formation of Contracts - Defenses to Contract Formation Flashcards
What are the Defenses to Formation?
- Mistake
- Misunderstanding
- Misrepresentation
- Undue Influence
- Duress
- Capacity to K
When is there a defense to formation?
A person who is said to be in breach of K can defend the action by showing:
- There was no meeting of the minds
- Due to mistake or misunderstanding, misrep. or fraud, undue influence or duress, or party’s own lack of capacity
What is a Mistake
A belief that is not in accord with the facts as to a basic assumption on which the contract was made that materially affects performance
- Mistake must be w/ regard to a belief about an existing fact
- NOT something that will happen in the future
What is a Unilateral Mistake ?
One party is mistaken as to essential element of the K
When is there a Mutual Mistake ?
- Both parties are mistaken as to an essential element of the K
When does a party bear the risk of mistake?
Conscious Ignorance - When she is aware at the time of the K that she has only limited knowledge of the facts to which the mistake relates
- AND accepts her limited knowledge as sufficient
Define Reformation for Mutual Mistake ?
When writing fails to express the agreement b/c of mistake of both parties, the writing can be reformed to express the agreement.
Misunderstanding
Both parties believe they are agreeing to the same material terms, bu they in fact agree to different terms
Misunderstanding - Neither party knows or should know of the misunderstanding
If a material term is involved, there is a misunderstanding
- Effect - No contract
Misrepresentation - One party knows or should know of the misunderstanding
K formed based on the meaning of the material term as understood by the unknowing party
Misrepresentation - Both parties know terms ambiguous at the time of K formation
No contract
- unless both parties intended the same meaning
Waiver of Misrepresentation
If there is misunderstanding 1 party can waive the misunderstanding & choose to enforce the K according to the other party’s understanding
Misrepresentation
An untrue assertion of fact that can make a contract void or voidable
- NOT law or opinion
What proof does Fraudulent Misrepresentation require?
Requires proof of:
- The misrepresentation is fraudulent
- A false assertion of fact made knowingly, or recklessly w/out knowledge of its truth, AND
- With intent to mislead the other party
- The misrepresentation induced assent to the K, AND
- The adversely affected party justifiably relied on the misrep.
Misrepresentation - Nondisclosure
Affirmative conduct to conceal a fact is = to an assertion that the fact doesn’t exist, if party not disclosing knows:
- Disclosure
- is nec. to prevent a prev. assertion from being fraudulent or a misrepresentation
- would correct a mistake of the other party as to a basic assumption, and failure to disclose would be a lack of good faith & fair dealing
- would correct mistake of other party as to the contents or effect of writing evidencing their agreement, OR
- Other party is entitled to know the fact b/c of a confidential or fid. rel.
Define Fraud in the Factum
Means fraud in the execution
What is Fraud in the Inducement & what is its effect?
Occurs when a fraudulent misrep.is used to induce the another to enter into a K
- Effect:
- K is voidable by the adversely affected party if she justifiably relied on the misrep. in entering the agreement
Nonfraudulent Misrepresentation
can be innocent or negligent - can still make the K voidable by the adversely affected party if:
- The misrep. is material
- The misrep induced assent to the K, and
- The adversely affected party justifiably relied on the misrep.