Forensics Flashcards
Define offender profiling
a behavioural and analytical tool that is intended to help investigators accurately predict the type of person likely to have committed the crime
Top-Down approach
Begins by carefully looking at the crime scene and drawing conclusions from the evidence about the offender. Interviewing them then means that the profilers can build a picture of typical offender behaviours and build
T-D originates
Was adopted by the FBI in the 1970s and is also known as the American approach
T-D Hazelwood and Douglas (types)
Made a distinction between the types of offenders by interviewing 36 imprisoned serial killers, to classify those who commit crimes - organised and disorganised
T-D Jackson and Bekerian stages of building a profile
Data Assimilation - collecting all available evidence
Crime Classification - into a particular type
Crime Reconstruction - to develop predictions and motives
Profile Generation - develop a profile based on this regarding various characteristcs
Disorganised crime*
To test the accuracy of the two groups. Analysed 100 US serial killers. Found significantly higher no of DO. Further analysis didn’t clearly seperate the types. Suggesting that DO crimes are easier to identify, or less O crimes are committed. If they’re easier to spot, TMT the criteria are insufficient
A03 T-D
- Canter et al: too simplistic. HE, only conducted in the US.
-Based on outdated models of personality.
Who developed the bottom Up Approach/ Investigative Psych
Devevloped by Canter et al. The British Approach
B-U key assumptions about the interactions between offenders and victims
Egger (1999):
Interpersonal Coherence -consistency between the way offenders interact with their victims and how with others
Time + Place - time and location will communicate about C’s own residence/employment
Crim Characteristics - characteristics about the offender can help classify
Crim Career - crimes tend to be committed in a similar fashion, will indicate how activity to develop
Forensic awareness - offenders who show awareness of the police investigations are likely to have had previous encounters with CJS.
Geographical Profiling
A form of the BUA.
Takes particular notes of the principle of time and place
Geo P - Canter and Youngs clues regarding place in relation to offender
Locatedness - in violent crimes, there may be several L’s involved
Systematic crime location choice - assumption the crime scenes aren’t random. O will have some connection or familiarity
Centrality - CS tend to cluster as the O will have familiarity.
Commuters will travel from home
Marauders will commit close to home
Comparative case analysis - assumption that crimes are being committed by the same offender, increasing the precision.
John Duffy ‘Railway R*’
Canter was asked to support the police in capturing the RR. He put together the profile using investigative psych and geo prof. He identified him. Although the profile wasn’t completely accurate, he created a sufficient profile for the police to arrest and q Duffy.
B-U A03
Biological Explanation: Atavistic form
Latin word for ancestors, meaning the tendency to revert to an ancestral type. Therefore, offenders possess characteristics similar to lower primates that explain the criminality
Biological Explanation: Lombroso
Offenders have specific physical features that indicated they were less developed in the evoloutionary sense than non-offenders. Implying that offenders were more primitive and not completely responsible for their actions
Lombroso AO3
- didn’t use a control group.
Goring compared 3000 criminals and 3000 non-criminals - he found no significant differences between the two groups
(Biological A03) Kaplan’s self-derogation
Argues that if individuals experience persistently poor interactions with others (in this case due to their physical appearance), they will develop lower self-esteem which leads to frustration with others. Making them more likely to commit criminal behaviour
Nature vs Nurture - Biological explanation
Nature: Their physical appearance
Nurture: self-derogation theory
Genetic explanations - twin studies
Christiansen studied over 3500 pairs of twins in Denmark and looked into the concordance rates.
CCR were low and there was a difference between male and female pairs.
Environment still plays a role
Genetic explanations - family studies
Bruner et al conducted an analysis on a large Dutch family, who’d been responsible for many crimes. Males in the family had a genetic condition in the MAOA gene - the serotonin isn’t broken up and they are more impulsive.
Why do we use adoption studies
We cannot rule out the effect of the environment. Twins would live in the same house and are likely to receive the same treatment . adoption studies rule that out and look where there is no genetic similarity
Genetic explanations - adoption studies
Crowe compared two groups of adopted children 1 with criminal parents and 1with non-criminal parents (biologically). 50% pf CPA group committed crimes before 18. Only 5% of N-CPA had committed crimes before 18
Suggesting that regardless of environment children seem biologically pre-disposed to criminality
A03 Genetic explanations
Bruner’s case study is uniquely specific to the group, isn’t representative, cannot be generalised [only their family genes]
Neural explanations - Neurotransmitters
[Serotonin] linked to mood and impulsiveness
Moir and Jessel: low levels of serotonin linked to criminal behaviour
[Dopamine] results in pleasure, a rewarding feeling and a desire to repeat certain behaviour
Buitelaar: juvenile delinquents who were given dopamine antagonists to reduce their dopamine levels showed decreased aggressive behaviour