Forensic Psychology Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is offender profiling?

A
  • idea that an offender can be deduced from the characteristics of the offence, and components of the crime scene.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the 2 categories of the top-down approach that murders and rapists are classified into.

A
  • organised: usually planned crime, with above average intelligence and usually functioning members of society with stable relationships and control during crime
  • disorganised: usually below-average intelligence, and unplanned, tend to live alone and have history of sexual dysfunction+failed relationships.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 4 main stages in the construction of a profile using the top-down approach?

A
  • data assimilation
  • crime scene classification
  • crime reconstruction
  • profile reconstruction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Evaluate the Top-Down approach

A

+: useful tool when little physical evidence is available, shows that it can be used in a variety of different circumstances.
-: unscientific in the way its developed - data was collected from interviews from only 36 male criminals, so small sample size and self-reported data questions validity.
-: Limited range of crimes are applicable, more common offences do not apply as it reveals very little about the criminal themselves - so not applicable to all crimes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the Bottom-up approach

A
  • involves building a profile from collecting data and evidence FIRST, then constructing a profile.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Name and describe 3 key assumptions of the bottom-up approach.

A
  • interpersonal coherence - how the behave with the crime might be their nature in real life.
  • significance of time and place - clues as to where the criminal might work/live
  • Forensic awareness: describes people that may have been investigated before, eg making sure not to leave fingerprints or hair.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe the process of smallest space analysis.

A
  • a computer program that identifies correlations across patterns of behaviour, likely to establish patterns of behaviour that were likely to occur at the scene.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the process of geographic profiling.

A
  • using the assumption that offenders will restrict their work to geographical area
  • Circle theory - the fact that offenders likely to be a marauder or commuter.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluate the Bottom-up approach.

A

+: Scientific approach - data driven profiles, which limits need for intuition. Shows that it is objective and not driven by expectation or intuition.
+: applicable to several crime types - techniques like smallest space analysis can be used to profile offences such as burglary and murders as it does not come down to offender’s personality traits.
-: approach doesn’t seem to be consistent, as there may be varying amounts of evidence and data available at the scene, meaning there is no way to go forward without sufficient evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe Lombroso’s theory of atavistic form is terms of WHY criminality? (2 points)

A
  • the idea that criminality was innate, and criminals themselves were genetic throwbacks - less evolved that non criminals.
  • also touched on criminals having certain facial features, such as large or very small ears, facial aysmetry, a strong jaw etc.
  • so he said that they become a criminal due to not being able to adjust to civilised society.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluate the atavistic form.

A

+: first attempt at scientifically explaining criminality: came from religious explanations and made a major contribution to criminology today.
-/+: Deterministic: does not consider a criminal’s free will, which might lead to less severe punishment and removes blame and emphasises a focus on treatment, which may or may not be a good thing.
-: Racist ideas: many features that he mentions of ‘less evolved’ people focus on things like dark skin and curly hair, which are more likley ot be present in African communities. Shows that his theory can lead to discrimination and stereotypes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Outline genetic explanations for criminality.

A
  • candidate genes of MAOA
  • leads to lower levels of monoamine oxidase, which breaks down testorone
  • leading to higher levels of testostorne
  • linked to high levels of violence and aggression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline neural explanations of criminality.

A
  • antisocial personalities have less brain matter in the pre-frontal cortex, and lower activity.
  • this is associated with lower impulse control, which could lead to criminality.
  • amygdala is less activated due to lower serotonin levels, and that might lead to a person recognising that one is afraid, but not show empathy.
  • lower serotonin levels are also linked to aggression.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluate biological explanations of offending behaviour

A

+: Biological, and scientific approach. Thus, is objective and empirical, making it valid.
+/-: implications on justice system: the approach could turn focus to treatments rather than criminal punshiment, which might be more useful for some criminals than others.
-: Biological reductionism: ignores free will and/or environmental factors. Alternative explaination could be using the diathesis stress model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe Eysenck’s theory of the criminal personality

A
  • believed that all personality types had a biological basis.
  • described that criminals inherit a neurotic-extravert personality.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define neuroticism

A
  • people who experience high levels of emotion and are more likely to commit a crime in an emotionally charged situation, do not condition easily.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the link between a neurotic-extraverts and conditioning?

A
  • people who are neurotic-extravert associate their risk taking behaviour with the higher arousal levels, thus will be more likely to carry out impulse, or criminal behaviour more often.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define psychoticism

A
  • the amount of emotion/empathy/compassion felt for other people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Evaluate Eysenck’s theory of the criminal personality.

A

-: theory relies on stable personality over time, which may be too simplistic, and an alternative dual taximony was suggested, with people who are stable in offending behaviour, and those who stop offending behaviour in their adolescent years.
-: the fact that not all NE personality types become criminals, eg 5 factor model that takes into account agreeability and other factors that could be important in criminality.
+: Methodology in personality questionnaire - lie score that could eliminate, or reduce the effect of social desirability bias, leading to more valid results.

18
Q

Describe Kohlberg’s theory of moral reasoning as an explanation for offending behaviour

A
  • suggested that criminals do not get past the pre-conventional stage of moral reasoning - as they may commit a crime if they think they’ll get away with it, or if the crime benefits them in some way.
19
Q

Describe cognitive distortions as an explanation for criminality.

A
  • they are a failure to accurately represent reality in the mind. This may result in irrational thinking and misunderstanding of behaviour.
  • this can lead to behavioural responses that could be criminal.
20
Q

Describe 2 examples of cognitive distortions

A
  • Hostile Attribution bias: assumptions that another individual has negative intentions, eg from misleading body language, or ‘looks’. This may result in aggressive behaviour.
  • Minimalization: when one’s own behaviour is interpreted as less serious than it is - this may lead to justification where the individual may try to reduce their own personal feelings of guilt.
21
Q

Evaluate cognitive explanations for offending behaviour.

A

+: can be used in developing CBT and therapy to challenge irrational thinking. This means that research could reduce effects of crime, and its impact on the economy.

-: gender bias in Kohlberg’s research: all male sample, beta biased. But when women tested, they were less morally developed, and since males are more likely to be offenders, it shows that Kohlberg’s ideas are not generalisable.

-: research based on hypothetical dilemma tasks, so SDB likely to play here, and so the theory may not be generalisable to real life offences.

21
Q

Outline differential association theory

A
  • suggests that offending occurs through socialisation.
  • eg learned through social norms and relationships
21
Q

Evaluate the differential association theory.

A

+: RWA in crime prevention strategies esp in youth, eg providing mentoring, which can provide positive role models to help reduce crime.
-: deterministic, doesn’t take into account biological factors or free will. This shows that it is reductionist and a holistic approach would be better suited.
+: It can explain white collar crime, and gang behaviour, as it requires a certain level of skill, eg tax evasion requiring a skilled accountant. This shows that certain criminal behaviours can in fact be learnt, and encouraged in social situations.

21
Q

Describe the role of the superego

A
  • the sense of morality - what is right or wrong
22
Q

What are the 3 types of defective superegos

A
  • deviant
  • overharsh
  • weak superego
22
Q

What is a healthy superego?

A
  • a person with that will feel guilt for acting in a wrong manner, and unlikely to do so if it impacts others in a bad way too.
  • results from identification.
22
Q

How does a weak superego result in offending?

A
  • balance between id, ego and superego is lost, so Id dominates, leading to criminal urges.
23
Q

How does a deviant superego result in offending?

A
  • criminal same sex parent’s behaviour is internalised, and can lead to offending, as the person will not feel guilty for committing the crime
24
Q

How does a over-harsh superego result in offending?

A
  • seen as crime committed for an unconscious desire for punishment.
25
Q

Describe the 3 defense mechanisms that may contribute to offending behaviour.

A
  • rationalisation
  • displacement
  • sublimation
26
Q

Describe how defense mechanisms could lead to criminal behaviour

A
  • allows offenders to unconsciously justify their criminal behaviour which removes anxiety/blame.
  • this increases chances of reoffending.
27
Q

describe displacement

A
  • when a focus of a strong emotion is shifted towards a neutral target, instead of the origin of the strong emotion.
28
Q

Describe rationalisation

A
  • justifying a criminal act in a a rational way when it is in fact quite negative.
29
Q

Describe sublimation

A
  • when the id’s impulse is expressed in a more socially acceptable way so the desire to commit a heinous crime is diluted - eg stealing instead of murdering.
30
Q

Evaluate the psychodynamic explanation for offending behaviour.

A

-: psychic determinism: the fact that all crime is caused by unconscious desires removes all responsibility and blame from the original crime.
-: lack of research: the approach itself is non-empirical, so the existence of the id, ego, and superego cannot be proven, and is therefore unfalsifiable.
-: gender bias: huge alpha bias, as Freud suggested that women were morally inferior to men as they had weak superegos.

31
Q

Describe the restorative justice process

A
  • a system for dealing with offending behaviour, where rehabilitation is the focus.
  • involves trying to get the offender to understand the impact of their offense on the world - eg reconciliation with victim through meeting, or reperation - giving a repayment to their victim eg through actual payment, or community service etc.
32
Q

Evaluate the restorative justice process

A

-: depends on the victim cooperating, and they may not if they feel like the offender is going along with it just to avoid a harsher sentence .
-: many members of society might view this as a very soft approach for dealing with offending - might shape beliefs and stereotypes of offenders.
+: provides an opportunity for the victim to be empowered and provides satisfaction - which no other approach does. This can help provide much needed comfort to victims.

33
Q

Describe custodial sentencing
Describe 3 aims of custodial sentencing.

A
  • involves holding offenders in a secure facility - eg prison, juvenile detention centre etc.
  • Deterence: make an example out of them to stop other people from offending
  • Incapacitation: to make them physically unable to commit any more offending behaviour
  • Retribution: providing a consequence for the offense, both for society and victims.
34
Q

Describe psychological effects of custodial sentencing

A
  • depression: feelings of helplessness in high stress situations - self harm/suicide risk
  • deindividuation: strip sense of individuality, might lead to aggression
  • institutionalisation: could lead to recidivism as they become accustomed to prison culture.
35
Q

Evaluate custodial sentencing

A

+: many people in society view it as appropriate punishment for prisoners.
-: is very expensive for governments, which might take out money needed for other resources to help smoothly run a country
-: can be counterintuitive - effects of prison after release might increase rates of recidivism.

36
Q

Describe behaviour modification as a way to deal with offending behaviour

A
  • based on behaviourist principles that desirable behaviour can be learnt.
  • uses token economies and principles of operant conditioning to change behaviour within a controlled environment.
  • eg tokens awarded for desirable behaviour, then added up to save for a larger reward.
37
Q

Evaluate behaviour modification

A

+: easy to set up in a prison, no need for expert intervention - can go towards improving conditions for both staff and prisoners alike.
-: unlikely that this will produce long term changes in behaviour when prisoners released etc - shows that it might not be a long term solution to reduce recidivism.

38
Q

Describe anger management to deal with offending behaviour.

A
  • form of CBT that provides strategies to deal with stressful situations.
    1: cognitive preparation: learn to asses their own thoughts for triggers and irrational emotive aggression
    2: skills acquisition: ways to control anger are developed, eg relaxation techniques and improving communication skills to help avoid conflict.
    3: application practice: eg through role play to practice techniques learnt.
39
Q

Evaluate anger management as a way to deal with offending behaviour.

A

+: skills developed in anger management can be used when released - potentially helping them find employment and contribute to economy.
-: much of the research is based on self report techniques - subject to SDB, as prisoners may play along for quick release.
-/+: offending behaviour might be caused due to other reasons that aggression or anger, which it might not help address. However, the same technique can be applied for cognitive distortions.