fMRI Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What does BOLD stand for

A

Blood-Oxygen-Level-Dependent (imaging)… you measure the BOLD signal within a region

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Can you compare brain regions using fMRI

A

Nope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which brain region has been more successful mapped with fRMI

A

Visual (cause we know a fair bit about it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Kanwisher look at (1997)

A

Faces! Contrasted with objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Where did Kanwisher (1997) find activation for faces but not objects (or scrambled faces or hours or hands)

A

Fusiform gyrus (Fusiform Face Area, FFA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which brain region for ‘houses and plces’

A

Parahippocampal Place Area (PPA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which brain region for bodies

A

Extrastriate Body Part Area (EBA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who ran the critical alternative experiment to counter Kawisher’s Fusiform Face Area (FFA) thing? (about expertise)

A

Gauthier (1999)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was Gauthier’s alternative hypothesis?

A

That it was an expertise area, and we just happen to be expert at faces…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who ran the alternative hypothesis about visual field stuff… in relation to the FFA

A

Malach (2002)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Malach (2002) argue in relation to the FFA

A

It could be about ‘cortical topography’ ie eccentricity mapping, therefore coding is defined by ‘resolution needs’… ie FFA is good for everything that requires ‘high resolution ‘

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is ‘reverse inference’

A

In the context of fMRI, when an area of the brain is activated, we assume it is involved (potentially exclusively) in the cognitive processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Poldrack (2006) argue

A

that the reverse inference thing creates problems… the probability that we really learn from our fMRI results that cognitive process X i involved depends on:

  1. quality of the task to measure the cognitive process
  2. specificity of the region for this cognitive process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Badre & D’Esposito (2009) do?

A

Mapped the pre-frontal cortex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was Duncan’s argument (2001, 2010, 2013) (hint: specificity)

A

The frontal cortex is involved in tons of tasks relative but not absolute specialisation.. and that this was the same for other brain regions… he called it the ‘multi-demand network’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does it mean to over interpret null results

A

To assume that a brain region is NOT involved in a process simply because it didn’t show up on the scan…

17
Q

What did Coltheart (2005) argue

A

Neuroimaging has taught us nothing! (So far)

18
Q

Which neuro-imaging system would you use if you wanted to understand… where in the brain something happens

A

fMRI

19
Q

Which neuro-imaging system would you use if you wanted to understand… fast paced differences in processing

A

EEG

20
Q

Which neuro-imaging system would you use if you wanted to understand… causality

A

TMS (neural noise)