Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Pschology- Paper 1 > Flashcars > Flashcards

Flashcars Flashcards

1
Q
  1. Caregiver-Infant
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Interactions

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

poorted oy control led lab studies inch rel ability)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. Stages of Attachment (Schaffer & Emerson
A

1964)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

: Cultural bias (based on Western

A

nuclear fam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ating

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ih of geese eggs: one group hatched naturally with the mother

A

the other in an incubator where Lorenz was the first moving object they saw

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

ttachment in mammals is more complex and influenced by emotional bonds.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

eys spised without

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

earning Theory (Dollard & Miller

A

1950)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

keys ta sed with two surrocate mothers. wire mother with tood us. cloth mother without tood!

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Jamage (e.g

A

aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ssociated with tood lus 9 ck.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

imitation. Contradicted by Manow monkeys preterred comtont over tood.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

imengi: Explains artistonent formation interns of oser able bear ins

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

servable in human infants).

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

sternal eriking odet Eary stachment forms arena schema for hot develtinships.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

-world applicaton in chia care leg.

A

aboption policies stess forming carly bonas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

vation with 7 episodes (e.g

A

infant alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

int (Type 8): Confident to explore but seeks comfort from c

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

20-23ver; moderate anxiety (60-75%).

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

tant (Type C): High clinginess

A

extreme distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

imitation: Imposed etic-Strance Situation reflects Western ideals ot attachment (e.a. independence valued in Germany..

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

• attachment was most common across cultures (e.g

A

/0% Un

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q
  1. Bowlby’s Theory of Maternal Deprivation
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

itinuous care from the mother is essential for normal development: separation dunng the critcal period leads to irreversible harm.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

alection less psychopathy - an inability to form bonds or empathy).

A
28
Q

diagnosed as affectionless psychopaths

A

12 of whom had prolonged separation

29
Q

Evanga Practica apicaton inhospit podies arent alone stay in chiden)

A
30
Q
  1. Effects of Institutionalisation
A
31
Q

Finite

A
32
Q

study of Romanian orphans adopted in the UK.

A
33
Q

is adopted after 6 months showed disinhibited attachment (cingy

A

attention-seeking

34
Q

ition may play a role).

A
35
Q
  1. Early Attachment and Later Relationships
A
36
Q

Internal Working Model:

A
37
Q

Hazy ata shaver (9 inuences adult relationships.

A
38
Q

uals had healthier relationships compared to insecurely attached

A
39
Q

gun. Provides insight into now early experiences Shape aduit felatonsnaps

A
40
Q

Limitation: Correlational; cannot prove causation between early attachment and adult behavior

A
41
Q

Exam Strategy

A
42
Q

-N .

A
43
Q
  1. Compare and Contrast E.g
A

Bowlby’s monotropy vs. Schaffer’s multiple attachments.

44
Q

Attachment - Study Summary Table

A
45
Q

Study

A
46
Q

Lorenz (1935)

A
47
Q

Harlow (1958)

A
48
Q

Bowlby (1969)

A
49
Q

Ainsworth (1970)

A
50
Q

Van lizendoorn & Kroonenberg

A
51
Q

-1988

A
52
Q

Bowlby (1988)

A
53
Q

Findings

A
54
Q

Imprinting in geese-young

A
55
Q

biras followed the virst movinal

A
56
Q

oo ect they saw a numan.

A
57
Q

Infant monkeys preferred soft

A
58
Q

surrogate mother over wire

A
59
Q

mother with food.

A
60
Q

Developed Monotropic Theory

A
61
Q

emphasizing the primary

A
62
Q

attachment figure and internal

A
63
Q

working models.

A
64
Q

Developed Strange Situation: 3

A
65
Q

attachment types identified

A
66
Q

“secure, insecure-avoid ank
insecure-amoralent
Meta-analysis of Strange
Situation studies: variations in
attachment styles across
cultures
Maternal Deprivation
Hypothesislong-tern
emotional damage from
Relevance
Supports biological basis of
attachment: critical period fol
imorinuine
Shows the importance of
comfort in attachment, not just
food.
Foundation of attachment
theory, focus on the primary
careerver
Jo ented amerent attachment
styles in children and their
impact
Cultural variations in attachment
patterns (e.g., Japan vs. USA).
Links early attachment to
emotional development anc
later mental health.

A

Pschology- Paper 1 (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions