First past the post Flashcards
Features of FPTP
- two party system as voters are discouraged from voting for smaller parties
- Winners bonus due to a distorted amount of votes
- Bias towards major parties as smaller parties tend to have more supersede support
- Smaller parties lose out as larger parties have larger and more concentrated support
- Single party government as it promotes a 2 party system
How the recall of MPs act is effected due to FPTP ?
Safe seat MPs are less likely to be held accountable due to a petition of 10% of constituents being unlikely to be signed eg in 2018 Ian Paisley was only suspended fro 30 days after accepting a free holiday
Advantages of FPTP in terms of turnout
- Higher turnouts than other systems eg 2019 turnout = 67% compared to 46% for AMS in 2021
Disadvantage of FPTP in terms of small parties :
- It prevents new parties from breaking in to the political system and produces political inertia (smaller parties and issue parties fail to gain influence or success)
Example of a winners bonus
- There is a winners bonus eg 2015 the Conservatives won 36.9% of votes and 50% of seats
Example of why FPTP means the winner lacks legitimacy :
- Since 1950, the winning party has always had less than 50% of the vote suggesting they lack legitimacy
What was the disparity between Labour’s seats and vote share in 2005 :
- 2005 Labour won a majority of 66 seats with only 35% of the vote
What is the issue regarding safe seats and how many were there in 2015 ?
- The system produces safe seats eg 2015 there were 368 safe seats in which the results depended on (receive less info, less accountable and votes not of equal value)
What is the issue regarding marginal seats in 2015 ?
- 194 in 2015
- Parties tend to concentrate their efforts in marginal seats so voters receive more attention + info
- Votes here are more valuable than in safe seats and voters feel they have more influence
What is the disparity between seats and votes for the Lib Dems in 1992 and 1997 ?
- 1992 LD won 18 seats with 18% of the vote and in 1997 they won 46 seats and 17% of the vote
How did the 1983 general election votes show that the system produces distorted results ?
- 1983 General election (SDP/Liberal alliance won 23 seats with 25% of the vote compared to labour who won 209 seats with 28% of the vote)
How many votes do Green need for a seat compared to the Conservative party ?
There is a huge disparity on the average no. of votes a party need to win a seat eg green need 520,000 whereas the conservative party needs only 42,000
Timing advantage of FPTP :
- It is a simple system with quick results eg Sunderland often declare it around 11pm on election night compared to STV which can take weeks to calculate
Evidence that FPTP produces strong governments + evidence it fails to do so :
- It has stood the test of time and produced strong and decisive governments eg Johnson’s government under COVID + Margret Thatcher etc
- 2010, 2015 and 2017 : FPTP has failed to produce a decisive government majority suggesting this characteristic could be changing
AV referendum
- 2011
- Turnout was only 42%
- 62% voted no suggesting there is a clear consensus that reform isn’t wanted