first amendment – free speech Flashcards
content regulation
what does the court assumef ro any regulation of speech based on content
presumptively unconsitutional
content regulation
how does the government justify a content regulation
must show that the regulation is necessary to serve a compelling state interest and narrowly drawn to achieve that end
content regulation
what are the categories of speech that the government has a compelling interest in for content regulations
unregulated speech, which includes:
1. inciting imminent lawless actions
2. fighting words
3. obscenity
4. some commercial speech
content regulation
what standard are content-neutral regulations subject to
intermediate scrutiny; government must show:
1. they advance important interests unrelated to the suppression of speech
2. they do not burden susbtantially more speech than necessary or are narrowly tailored to further those interests
conduct regulation
what is necessary to determine whether time, place, and manner regulations are upheld
what type of forum is involved
when can symbolic speech be regulated
- regulation is within the constitutional power of the government
- furthers an important government interest
- the government interest is unrelated to the suppression of speech
- the incidental burden on speech is no greater than necessary
TPM regulations
what is considered a public forum
government properties that are historically open for speech activities
TPM regulations
what is considered a designated public forum
government properties not historically open for speech activities but which have been thrown open by the government for such activities –either all the time or at specified times
TPM regulations
what is the test for TPM regulation involving a public forum or designated public forum
- be content neutral
- be narrowly tailored to achieve an important government interest
- leave open alternative channels of communication
TPM regulation
what is considered a limited public forum
government properties not historically open for speech activities but which the government has opened for a particular purpose
TPM regulation
what is considered a nonpublic forum
government properties not historically open for speech activities and not held open for speech activities in any way
TPM regulations
what is the test for a TPM regulation involving a limited public forum or nonpublic forum
- viewpoint neutral
- be reasonable related to a legitimate government purpose
reasonableness of regulation
regardless of whether the regulation is content-based or content-neutral, what are the three challenges that can be made to a regulation
- overbroad regulation
- void for vagueness
- officials given unfettered discretion
reasonableness of regulation
what is considered an overbroad regulation
a regulation that prohibits substantially more speech than necessary; if regulation punishes a substantial amount of protected speech in relation to the regulation’s plainly legitimate sweep, the regulation is facially invalid
reasonableness of regulation
what is the void for vagueness doctrine
- DP requires that laws be reasonable (i.e., sufficiently clear to allow reasonable persons to know what is prohibited)
- inherent vagueness of the statute has a chilling effect on protected speech activities and renders at least that part of the statute unconstitutional
reasonableness of regulation
what is required to avoid having a statute deemed void for officials given unfettered discretion
must be defined standards for applying the law
reasonableness of regulation
how are licensing schemes established to regulate time, place, and manner of speech deemed valid
- must be related to an important government interest
- contain procedural safeguards
- cannot grant officials unbridled discretion
unlimited discretion is void on its face & speaks need not even apply for a permit
reasonableness of regulation
if a licensing scheme includes standards, what must the speaker do
may not ignore the statute; apply for license, and if denied, then challenge under FA
scope of speech
what else is included in free speech outside actually speaking
- freedom not to speak (the right to refrain from speaking or endorsing beliefts with which one does not agree)
- symbolic conduct
content regulation
when is commercial speech unprotected
if it proposes unlawful activity or is misleading or fradulent
content regulation
when is a regulation pertaining to commercial speech upheld
- serves substantial government interest
- directly advances that interest
- narrowly tailored to serve the interest
public employment
what’s the general rule as to employers being able to regulate government employee’s speech
if their speech does not involve a matter of public concern, then the courts give employers broad discretion to punish speech that is disruptive of the workplace
public employment
what test does the court apply if a government employee’s speech involves a matter of public concern
- the right of the public employee to speak freely on a matter of public concern; against
- the state’s interest in efficiently performing state functions