con law (C&C/DP/EP) Flashcards

1
Q

strict necessity

how is a case “justiciable” and thus can be heard by SCOTUS

A

depends on whether there is a “case or controversy”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

strict necessity

what type of opinions can the court not issue and why

A

advisory opinions –there must be a present risk of harm or threat of specific future harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

strict necessity

what are the 3 primary inquiries for the case or controversy requirement

A
  1. ripeness
  2. mootness
  3. standing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

standing

how does an organization have standing

A
  1. injury in fact to the members that gives them the right to sue on their own behalf
  2. injury related to organization’s purpose
  3. individual member participation is not required
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

standing

how does an individual have standing to bring a claim

A
  1. injury in fact
  2. act in issue was the cause of the injury
  3. adjudication in favor of the challenging party would satisfy their grievance (redressability)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

standing

how can a person with standing assert third party rights

A
  1. if the third party would find it difficult to assert her own rights; or
  2. the injury suffered by the plaintiff adversely affects her relationship with the third party (e.g., doctor can assert a patient’s rights in challenging an abortion restriction)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

relative spheres of federal and state power

what does the supremacy clause provide

A

federal law is supreme and state laws that are preempted by federal law are invalid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

relative sphres of federal and state power

how can state laws be preempted

A
  1. expressly (federal law expressly preempts state law)
  2. impliedly (state law conflicts with federal law, prevents the achievement of federal objectives, or because Congress’s laws are so pervasive they preempt the entire field)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

relative sphres of federal and state power

what do courts start with when analyzing whether a state law is preempted by federal law

A

in cases involving a field traditionally within the power of states, courts will start with the presumption that the historic state police powers are not to be superseded unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

relative sphres of federal and state power

when are state laws not deemed invalid under the Supremacy Clause

A

state laws that regulate consistently with federal policy and in a manner that reinforces said policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

procedural DP

what does procedural due process prohibit

A

prohibits a person from being deprived by the government of life, liberty, or property without due process of law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

procedural DP

what 3 questions must be asked to answer a procedural due process question

A
  1. is there a protected liberty or interest involved?
  2. did the individual receive adequate notice?
  3. was the individual given a meaningful opportunity to be heard, tailored to the deprivation in question?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

procedural DP

how is the concept of property understood

A

it is flexible; an individual must prove a legitimate “claim” or “entitlement” to a benefit under federal or state law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

procedural DP

how is the concept of liberty understood

A

more than just freedom from bodily restraints. deprivation occurs if a person (1) loses significant freedom of action or (2) denied freedom provided by Constitution or statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

procedural DP

what does the court assess to determine whether the process was appropriate

A
  1. the nature of deprivation (importance of interest)
  2. the government’s interest involved (fiscal and administration policy)
  3. the risk of an erroneous deprivation (value of specific procedural safeguards)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

procedural DP

what is usually required for process

A
  1. fair procedures and an unbiased decisionmaker
  2. notice and chance to respond before termination of the interest involved
17
Q

procedural DP

what determines whether someone has a property interest in state employment

A

state law

18
Q

procedural DP

when does DP protection apply for a property interest in continued employment

A

if a policy says an employee can only be fired under certain circumstances, then DP protections apply

19
Q

substantive DP

what does substantive DP require

A

laws must be (1) reasonable and (2) not arbitrary

determination of whether a law is reasonable depends on the interests involved

20
Q

substantive DP

when does strict scrutiny apply

A

where a law limits a fundamental right, and the law will only be upheld if the government can prove that the action is necessary to promote a compelling or overriding interest

21
Q

substantive DP

when does rational basis apply

A

all other cases; action will be upheld unless the challenger can show that the action is not rationalyl related to any legitimate government interest

22
Q

substantive DP

what does the court employ when assessing whether a regulation passes the rational basis test

A

a deferential review –presumption of constitutionality

23
Q

what is the vagueness doctrine

A

law can be held unconstitutional if it fails to prove reasonable notice of what is prohibited and minimal guidelines to discourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement

24
Q

EP

what does EP prohibit

A

prohibits states from unreasonably discriminating against people in similar situations

25
Q

EP

what determines what test to apply for EP

A

dependent on the basis of discrimination and the nature of interests involved

26
Q

EP

when does strict scrutiny apply

A

when the action involves a fundamental right or suspect classification (e.g., race) – government must show that the action is narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling state interest

27
Q

EP

when does intermediate scrutiny apply

A

when an action involves quasi-suspect classification (e.g., gender or legitimacy)

28
Q

EP

when does rational basis apply

A

all other cases – classifications must have some rational relationship to a legitimate government objective