Finance under James I Flashcards

1
Q

James’ Extravagance:

A
  • Elizabeth spent less than £300,000 in peacetime-> James rose immediately to £400,000.
  • Spending £522,000 in 1614.
  • 12 night feast–> French ambassador, cost over £4000. Paying Lord Hay’s debts.
  • Gave presents totalling to £400,000.
    £185,000 spent on jewels from 1612.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What financial debt did Elizabeth I leave?

A

£420,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Was Elizabeth I’s financial debt as serious as it seemed?

A

No, £300,000 of grant made by Parliament in 1601 still needed to come in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who was a lot of Elizabeth I’s debt owed to?

A

£100,000 of debt owed to landowners who had paid a forced loan in 1590s, who had given up any expectation that it would be repaid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the structural weaknesses?

A
  • Main Parliamentary tax was subsidy.
  • Grants given in fifteenths and tenths, not masses of money at one time.
  • Only collected for emergencies, such as war. Rest of the time, James was meant to ‘live on his own’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How did war impact finances?

A
  • Despite peace being made with Spain, 1604, military expenditure didn’t stop.
  • Ireland 1603-1608, £600,000 spent on army.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How much did the subsidies decrease from Elizabeth to James?

A

1558, Elizabeth received £137,000 from each subsidy.
1621, fell to £72,500.
Had been inflation under Elizabeth I’s reign, James could fund a fifth of what Elizabeth could from a subsidy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is ordinary revenue?

A

Income a monarch made a year.
Not from Parliament, from other sources, such as Crown lands, Customs revenue, wardships and purveyance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the crown lands?

A
  • The most important source of revenue was crown lands.
  • Elizabeth had sold over £800,000 worth of estates, but now unpopular due to extracting economic rents.
  • Diminished in importance under James’ reign, times of financial crisis, lord treasurers saw selling of land as quickest method to remake the money.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was customs revenue?

A
  • Otherwise known as tonnage and poundage.
  • Taxes on imports and exports, mainly on wine and dry goods.
  • Rates wrote down in the Book of Rates.
  • 1621, customs revenue brought in three times as much revenue as crownlands.
  • Lord Treasurer, Earl of Dorset and Robert Cecil then decided to farm out, instead of collect customs duties.
  • Merchants would give an annual rent in return for collecting the revenues.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the advantages to farming out the customs duties?

A
  • King received a fixed and regular income, with additional patronage.
  • Close group to crown created, probably willing to make loans when crown in time of financial difficulty.
  • For merchant, effective because crown never demanded a price that matched what they were collecting.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why was farming out customs duties disliked in Parliament?

A

New indirect tax had been created, causing great unease in Parliament, saw control on taxation as being undermined.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is an example of the unease in Parliament about customs revenue?

A
  • Fear for Parliament increased in 1606 when merchant, John Bate refused to pay a duty on currants, said it hadn’t been sanctioned by Parliament.
  • Robert Cecil pursued Bate’s case and Judge Fleming went in King’s favour, saying it was the King’s prerogative to impose impositions on selected goods.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the consequences of Bate’s case?

A

Salisbury drew up a list of 1400 items, new duties known as impositions but into new Book of Rates, published 1608.
An extra £70,000 a year raised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were Wardships?

A
  • Also known as feudal tenures, dated from the Middle Ages. Lost justification, but not usefulness to the crown.
  • Feudal tenures- major landowners owed a military duty to the King, so the king was entitled to take their property if they died and heir was a minor or woman.
  • Could bring ruin to families, land would get neglected.
  • Brought in £65,000 in 1610.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was purveyance?

A
  • Another medieval relic.
  • Court could buy provisions at fixed prices, well below market rates.
  • System open to abuse, would buy excess provisions and sell them at a profit.
  • Worth £40,000.
17
Q

How did Robert Cecil try to solve James’ extravagance?

A
  • Earl of Salisbury.
  • Imposed ‘Book of Bounty’, 1608.
  • Prohibited Crown giving away land or major assets.
18
Q

Was the Book of Bounty effective?

A
  • James gave away in cash instead, last four months of 1610, gave away £36,000.
19
Q

Official self interest of Salisbury:

A
  • ‘bent the rules’ for James, to earn his approval. Suggested given Sir Walter Raleigh’s manor (who had his estates confiscated due to a treason allegation 1604) to new favourite Robert Carr.
  • 1609, salisbury gained £1400 from a wardship that earned the crown £370.
  • 1610, negotiated the renewal of silk duties, gained him £7000 a year.
20
Q

What was the impact of Parliamentary taxation?

A
  • Those liable to pay subsidy, excluding poor, had to declare their worth and would often lie.
  • Lionel Cranfield (lord treasurer 1621-4) only taxed £150 when worth £90,000.
  • Buckingham, £400,000 taxed £400.
21
Q

Why couldn’t the King rely on Parliamentary taxation?

A
  • 1624 Subsidy Act granted James £300,000, totally inadequate.
22
Q

First Parliamentary session:

A
  • James’ first Parliament (1604-10), wary about making grants. Would give no supply because of large grant made at end of Elizabeth’s reign still being collected.
23
Q

Second Parliamentary session:

A
  • 1606, aftermath of the Gunpowder plot, made unusually large grant of £400,000.
  • Mislead James into believing that Parliament would always pay his debts.
  • Grant passed with slimmest majority (one vote).
  • 1606-1621, James only received one grant of £100,000.
  • New financial system needed, Great Contract.
24
Q

What was the Great Contract?

A
  • 1610, suggested by Salisbury.
  • In return for annual grant of £200,000 from Parliament and a one-off payment of £600,000 to clear Crown’s debts in return for the abolition of purveyance and wardships.
25
Q

How did Parliament initially respond to the Great Contract?

A
  • Agreed to annual rent, but would only give £100,000 from a subsidy.
  • Doubts surfaced on both sides, MPs didn’t like idea of funding James’ extravagance.
  • Also realised getting rid of wardships would be getting rid of a useful form of patronage.
  • Described James as a ‘leaky cistern’.
  • James then claimed that he would accept £500,000, which was refused.
26
Q

What have historians said about the failure of the Great Contract?

A
  • Said it would have been a ‘lifeline’ for the Stuart dynasty.
  • Parliament had impeded chances of future tranquillity.
  • Would have reduced conflict between Parliament and Crown and Parliament could have had more responsibility in financing the government.
27
Q

When were the years of drift?

A

1612-18

28
Q

What happened in the years of drift?

A
  • James’ eldest son Henry, and his treasurer, Salisbury, died in 1612.
  • James did not initially replace treasurer.
  • Government drifted with no sense of purpose.
  • Parliament of 1614 failed to grant any money, so James sold titles.
  • Created title of ‘baronet, just for it to be sold.
  • Price of barony fell from £1095 to £220 by 1622.
  • Selling earldoms at £10,000 more successful. Earls increased from 28 in 1615 to 65 by 1628.
  • Cockayne’s scheme.
29
Q

What happened in Cockayne’s scheme?

A
  • William Cockayne wanted to break into the monopoly of merchant adventurers for sale of unfinished cloth to the Netherlands, England’s biggest export market.
  • 1614, persuaded the King to prohibit the export of unfinished cloth on the grounds that this would generate employment in the finishing cloth and increase customs revenue.
30
Q

Why did Cockayne’s scheme fail?

A
  • Dutch reacted to attempted attack on their industry by finding new sources of unfinished cloth.
  • Unemployment instead soared.
  • In two years, exports sent through London went down by a third and customs revenue fell accordingly.
  • Cloth trade eventually recovered, but didn’t reach high point of 1614.
31
Q

Who was the new treasurer after Salisbury?

A
  • 1614, the Earl of Suffolk became lord treasurer.
  • Corruption surpassed anything, crown’s debt doubled (nearly), £500,000 to £900,000.
  • Suffolk dismissed 1618.
32
Q

Who was Cranfield?

A

Appointed master of the wardrobe, 1618.

33
Q

What was Cranfield’s impact?

A
  • If costs fell from existing £42,000 to £20,000, Cranfield could keep any additional savings. Soon made a profit of £7000 a year.
  • Ordinance (supply of weapons), costs fell from £34,000 to £14,000. Achieved this by attacking waste, saying candles were to be used more than once eg.
  • Saved over £100,000 a year.
34
Q

When was Cranfield created Lord treasurer?

A

1621

35
Q

Why did Cranfield fall?

A

Cranfield opposed Buckingham and his desire for war, tried to undermine him by attempting to make his nephew Arthur Brett the new favourite.
April 1624, accused of defrauding the crown.