Final Review Flashcards
This is a set of flashcards focusing on the class' weakest areas
Compare the free speech protections afforded to traditional media and social media platforms.
Traditional media: more established protections. Social media: evolving regulations, debates over content moderation and liability.
Explain why some politicians might accuse the media of bias against their party or ideology.
Perception of unfair coverage, disagreement with framing. Media as “opposition party.” Rallies base, discredits critical reporting.
Develop an argument about whether the current system of checks and balances is sufficient for holding the bureaucracy accountable and protecting individual rights. Use evidence to support your position.
Varies based on evidence and perspective. Potential arguments: Checks and balances work (oversight, judicial review). Or, insufficient (agency discretion, limited oversight).
Define soft money and explain its significance in presidential campaign fundraising.
Soft money: unlimited contributions to parties for “party-building activities.” Banned in 2002. Allowed large donations from corporations, unions, wealthy individuals.
Explain how interest groups can use litigation and amicus briefs to influence judicial decisions on policy issues.
Litigation: bring cases to courts to achieve policy goals. Amicus briefs: present arguments to court in support of a side. Provides additional perspectives, information.
Describe the role of political parties in coordinating and supporting presidential campaigns.
Parties: coordinate messaging, provide resources and infrastructure, organize events and volunteers, connect with state and local organizations.
Compare the mechanisms for holding the federal bureaucracy accountable to those for state and local bureaucracies.
Federal: Congressional oversight, presidential control, judicial review, inspector generals. State/local: legislative oversight, executive control, state courts, auditors.
Explain how the media’s agenda-setting function can influence public opinion and political priorities.
Agenda-setting: media influences topic salience and importance. Heavy coverage increases perceived importance, shapes political priorities.
Describe how campaign messaging and advertising can influence voter beliefs and behaviors.
Messaging: frames issues, primes considerations, persuades voters. Advertising: increases name recognition, mobilizes supporters, targets key demographics.
Define lobbying and explain its role in the policymaking process.
Lobbying: seeking to influence policy on behalf of an interest group. Provides information, arguments to policymakers. Shapes agenda, content of policy.
Explain how the relationship between candidates and their major donors can affect policy priorities and governance.
Donors may have access and influence post-election. Candidates may prioritize donor interests or feel beholden. Appearance of corruption. But, donors also support like-minded candidates.
Describe the role of whistleblowers in exposing bureaucratic waste, fraud, or abuse.
Whistleblowers: insiders who report misconduct. Expose wrongdoing, spur investigations and reforms. Legal protections vary.
Compare the campaign finance regulations for presidential and congressional elections.
Presidential: public funding available for general election. Individual contribution limits higher. Congressional: no public funding. Lower individual contribution limits.
Explain how social media has influenced political socialization and public opinion in recent years.
Social media: exposes users to political content, enables engagement and sharing. Echo chambers and filter bubbles. Misinformation and polarization concerns.
Describe the role of think tanks in providing policy analysis and expertise to decision-makers.
Think tanks: research and advocate on policy issues. Provide analysis, recommendations to policymakers and media. Represent various ideologies and interests.
Explain why some individuals might choose to join or support specific interest groups based on their policy priorities.
Agreement with group’s policy positions, desire to influence policy. Benefit from group’s work. Sense of engagement, solidarity with like-minded others.
Develop an argument about whether public opinion should be the primary driver of policy decisions in a representative democracy. Use evidence to support your position.
Varies based on evidence and perspective. Potential arguments: Public opinion should drive policy (popular sovereignty, responsiveness). Or, representatives should use judgment (deliberation, minority rights).
Define prior restraint and explain its significance in the context of press freedom.
Prior restraint: government censorship before publication. Prohibited by First Amendment except in rare cases (national security). Protects press freedom.
Explain how the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures has been interpreted in light of new technologies and security threats.
Courts balance privacy and security interests. Examples: warrant requirements for cell phone searches, NSA surveillance. Evolving standards of reasonableness.
Describe the role of the media in shaping public opinion during election campaigns.
Media: provides information on candidates and issues, frames narratives, fact-checks claims. Influences voter knowledge, perceptions, and priorities.
Explain how the relationship between interest groups and political parties can affect policy outcomes.
Groups may ally with parties on issues, provide resources. Parties balance group demands with broader coalition. Groups can also challenge party positions.