Final Review Flashcards
Main Point questions
Paraphrase conclusion
- Identify conclusion
- Identify premises
- paraphrase the main conclusion and forget about the premises
there is always a key word in the conclusion that is paraphrased into the answer choices
Most strongly supported
- read the passage and choose the one that most supports the arguments.
- answer choice may have “if”
- take words literally, for instance: most, few, many
- based on what we know, conclusion and premise
Weaken
- there must be other reason for why the conclusion is correct.
- find another reasoning that destroys the support between the premise and conclusion
- yeah but…
(as soon as you identify the conclusion, use the “Yeah but” test) - question stems that include the word: partial only, means that you need to complete it.
- evidence against
- yeah but what if,
- some time the LSAT uses evidence that wasn’t present when it happened
the key of these questions is to find a DIFFERENT REASON “WHY”
Strengthen
information within the context of the argument
LR
Always eliminate the answer choices that you are 100% they are wrong.
be aware of vague language.
Sufficient Assumptions
use logic
- draw if you have to
- remember g1,2,3,4
- take contrapositives
Must be True
- Yeah, but what if?
- what do you know for sure, based on the argument
Argument Part
- find premise and conclusion and see how the part that the question stem is asking for, plays within the argument.
Method of Reasoning
- find premise and conclusion, then define what method of reasoning is played
- ask yourself: what is it doing?
Principle
- find the premise and the conclusion
- what resolves the issue
- therefore
Parallel
- map the reasoning to make it easier
- count elements
- follow the logic that is being utilized
Flaw
- the flaw between the premise and conclusion
- think about that is happening between the conclusion and premise and what’s not happening…
- review types of flaw:
1. circular: p and c are = - why the premise doesn’t support the conclusion
- it fails to consider: if…….
Flaw Parallel
- follow logical indicators
can, not, only, must, most, few, many - identify key words as well
Necessary assumptions
- identify premise and conclusion
- looking for an answer choice that, bridges or wrecks the argument (meaning that when negating it, it destroys the argument)
- must be necessary in order for it to be true or applicable to the case
- the correct answer choice is the one that contradicts the argument
- what HAS to be true!
- depends on the assumption on….
Resolve and Reconcile
- find the discrepancy between the two point made in the argument
Point at Issue
- find what’s the main point on which both arguments disagree/agree
Miscellaneous… Complete the blank
- find premise and conclusion and based on that allocate the gap between the two
- say: “that’s is why….” the discrepancy between the two
Games
- read carefully, the way you translate the rules
- once you put “g” at the end, how many empty spaced do you have left?
- the first two shown?
- at least once
- exactly once
vulnerable to criticism
attack the argument
if does not use quantifiers
assume that they are talking about all