Final Exam POLI 283 Flashcards
Cooperation and Conflict…
- Epitomizes the complex and contradictory nature of political
- Can co-exist
- Conflict between China and the U.S regarding the South China sea but Cooperation through the Six Party Talks regarding the North Korean nuclear program
Cooperation
- Refers to political actors proactively working together
- Inherently active
- Requires communication and interaction
- Can cooperate within existing structure or create new ones
- Multi/Bi lateral
Conflict
- Classes of interest (not necessarily warfare)
- Garners more attention than cooperation since it is more visible
- Sanctions, threats or pre-emptive strikes
- Securitization: naming something as a threat so extraordinary measures can be taken
Examples of Conflict: Complexity and Competing Processes
- No diplomatic relations between Cuba and the United States until the Obama administration due to their proximity and mutual interests
- Communicated through Canada despite conflict
- War on Drugs, international and domestic conflict
- Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
Globalization
- Greater integration and interdependence, growing ever increasingly interconnected
- Globalization itself is not new but its magnitude is
- Economically, socially , politically
- Reduces state autonomy through international regimes, trading blocs and subnational actors.
- Cultural impact
Fragmentation
- The attempt to push back against globalization
- Withdrawal from global interactions
- Reactionary or defensive
- Identity politics
- Focus on own interests and concerns
- Impedes globalization , turns government attention to local issues
Examples of Globalization: Complexity and Competing Processes
- Travel and communication
- the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis due to currency speculation
- Spice Road
- International law, the enlightenment, UN, World Bank and the IMF
Examples of Fragmentation: Complexity and Competing Processes
- Brexit
- Donald Trump
- Protection of Canadian Dairy Farmers
- Iran’s retreat in to nationalism
- Nationalism during WWI, WWII, Cold War
Anarchy v.s Order
Examples for Complexity and Competing Processes
- International politics inherently anarchic, basic tensions stem from this
- No supranational power above the level of the state
- Can’t address grievances
- Order through international institutions and cooperation
- Order through formal structures and mutual interests that increase the predictability of the international political system
Systemic Level of Analysis
-Big picture
-International
-Anarchic
2 IMPORTANT ASSUMPTIONS
-All states are unitary actors meaning they all have the same internal makeup
-States are rational actors therefore they make decision based on cost benefit analysis
-Tries to give us predictability
-Zero Sum Game
Domestic Level of Analysis
- State level
- Examine domestic structure to understand how a state may behave
- For example a democratic state with corresponding institutions operates differently than a non-democratic one
Individual Level of Analysis
- Leaders
- Can one individual make a difference
- Operational Code adopted and refined y Alexander George. Used as an analytical tool to see how perspectives and perceptions colour leaders decision making.
Cooperation and Conflict: Theory and World Politics
- Climate Change
- Cooperation: Kyoto Greenhouse Gas Emission Protocol and the Copenhagen Accord. Weak international agreements with no tangible consequences. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Idea of collective action to combat an international issue
Conflict: US senate political disagreement about Kyoto Protocol
Globalization and Fragmentation: Theory and World Politics
Climate Change
- Globalization: Climate Change itself is a form of globalization. It transcends borders and therefore requires heightened interdependence
- Fragmentation: The developing world argues that they should be exempt from emission standards as they are undergoing the industrialization that the developed world has already gone through and benefited from.
Anarchy v.s Order: Theory and World Politics
Climate Change
- Anarchy: No institution at the international level that can enforce Climate Change Agreements
- Order: Existing international framework through which agreements can be facilitated
Systemic, Domestic, Individual : Theory and World Politics
Systemic: International institutions. United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change. Unacceptable losses to great powers but climate change reduction cannot take place without them.
Domestic: Developed v.s Developing. EU member states most successful in reducing greenhouse gas emission. Reduce the security dilemma. World Systems Theory, exploitation of the peripheral states by the core
Individual: Trump v.s Trudeau. 2007 Shiela Watt-Cloutier Inuit political leader won UN award for activism against Climate Change. Liberals would argue that she is using international legal mechanisms and institutions to draw attention to her cause.
Realism
Classical Realism
Neorealism
NeoClassical
-Law of jungle, every state must protect itself and its own interests. Anarchy and conflict. Survival of the fittest: Hans Morgenthau, Henry Kissinger
Classical: negative view of human nature. people inherently self interested and suspicious.
Neorealism: Corresponds with the systemic level of analysis where every state is the same. Unitary, rational actors. Primary concern is survival. Security Dilemma
NeoClassical: Reintroduces state (domestic level) Relative power measure by its resources and capability, determines position on world stage. Revisionist states attempt to overthrow international regime.
Liberalism and Neoliberalism
- Primarily cooperative intellectual tradition
- Contractual aspect of the imposition of restrictions- John Locke
- Cooperation is possible and beneficial
- Variable sum game not Zero sum
- Different beliefs regarding human nature
- Rules that actors choose to adhere to because it is in their best interest to do so
Neoliberalism: relies on systemic analysis, anarchy can be overcome through institutions, regimes and interdependence. Institutions increase trust, reduce possible state defection and facilitate regular communication.
Democratic Peace Theory
- Focus on the domestic level of analysis
- Extremely unlikely that liberal democracies go to war against each other
- Immanuel Kant Perpetual Peace
Constructivism
- STATES ARE NOT RATIONAL
- Actors interests and identities are developed internally and evolve
- Liberals and realists assume identity
- International actors make their own reality.
- The problem with constructivism is that there are too many moving parts therefore the theory loses all predictive ability, good for explaining but not predicting
Conflict and Cooperation: World Politics and Economics 1648-1945
- Systemic: World Wars. After the Napoleonic Wars, Britain promoted a more open economy to promote peace and interdependence. Creation of the UN, Concert of Europe, Bretton Woods System (1945) eventually created the World Bank and IMF. Designed to facilitate economic cooperation
- Domestic: Cold War and the genocide in Yugoslavia are all examples of conflict. American revolution, colonist revolted against taxation without representation that resulted from the debt from the Seven Years War.
- Individual: Woodrow Wilson promoted a system in which all states act in common interest and protection. Collective Security dream of League of Nations. Napoleon and his European conquest.
Globalization and Fragmentation: Word Politics and Economics 1648-1945
- Systemic: Globalization of the economy and technology through the Industrial Revolution. Started in Britain and caused population explosion, city growth and a new family structure. Trade forged links.
- Domestic: Fragmentation. The multinational nature of the Austria-Hungary empire.
Anarchy v.s Order: World Politics and Economics: Cold War
- There was no supranational institution which could impose any sort of tangible consequences on the two major powers in the international system. Proxy wars raged in Korea and Vietnam but the anarchic nature of the international political arena prevented any intervention by a higher power.
- No predictability so entirely anarchic
Cooperation and Conflict: World Politics and Economics: Cold War
-Cooperation through NATO and the Warsaw Pact. These alliances facilitated cooperation and increased the cost of inter-member conflict. Domestic: The cooperation between the Soviet Union and select countries from the Nonaligned Movement. Established close economic and political relations. Systemic: growth of the world economy and the post war liberal economic order.
-Conflict: security dilemma between the Soviet Union and the United States. Vietnam War, Korean War, Afghanistan, Cuban Missile Crisis. Both sides viewed the others self defense mechanisms as direct threats and subsequently increased their offensive capabilities.
Individual: Harry Truman’s “Get Tough” stance to check Soviet Expansion.