Final Exam Flashcards

1
Q

2 ways to create infinite sentences

A
  1. Recursion-adding to sentence

2. Repetition of words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Generative Grammar

A

System of rules that can generate all the grammatical sentences of a language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Content words (open class)

A

Noun, verb, adjective, adverb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Function words (closed class)

A

Determiner, preposition, conjunction, pronoun

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Intransitive verb

A

Verb takes no object (ex: lie, sleep)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Transitive verb

A

Verb takes one object (ex: hug, kick)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ditransitive verb

A

Verb takes two objects (ex: give, put)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Thematic Relations (8)

A
  • Agent
  • Theme
  • Recipient
  • Location
  • Source
  • Goal
  • Time
  • Instrument
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Deep structure

A

Abstract representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Surface structure

A

Forms of sentences from transformation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Syntax-first theories

A

Use only syntactic cues to construct parse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Constraint-based theories

A

Use all available info to figure out parse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Two-Stage Model (AKA Garden Path Model)

A
  • Serial and syntax-first

- Comprehenders always construct the simplest parse and only revise if conflicting syntactic info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Good-Enough Processing

A

Comprehenders reject right analysis if it doesn’t seem plausible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Expectation-Based Comprehension Theory

A

The less probable the structure, the more costly it is to re-rank your parse hypotheses, explains lack of GP effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Principle of Immediate Mention

A

Production is more efficient if quickly selected lemmas can be mentioned

17
Q

Types of Speech Acts (5)

A
  1. Representative
  2. Directive
  3. Commissive
  4. Declarative
  5. Expressive
18
Q

Locutionary Force

A

What the sentence literally means

19
Q

Illocutionary Force

A

What the speaker is trying to do with the sentence

20
Q

Perlocutionary Force

A

The effect the sentence actually has on the listener

21
Q

Gricean Maxims (4)

A
  1. Quality-truth
  2. Quantity
  3. Relevance
  4. Manner-clarity
22
Q

Implicature

A

What is suggested in an utterance, but isn’t expressed nor strictly implied, can be cancelled (conventional or conversational/ad-hoc)

23
Q

Entailment

A

Relationship between two sentences where the truth of one requires the truth of the other

24
Q

Presupposition

A

Assumed beforehand

25
Q

General audience design

A

Atypical instruments mentioned more often

26
Q

Specific audience design

A

Occurs late (subsequent clause mention)

27
Q

Chomsky’s view of acquisition

A

Poverty of Stimulus

  • Quantity
  • Quality
28
Q

Language Acquisition Device (LAD)

A

Universal Grammar, innate predisposition, mental capacity

29
Q

Optimality Theory

A

Observed forms of language arise from the optimal satisfaction of conflicting constraints

30
Q

Prelocutionary (birth-10 months)

A

Signal not specialized for communication

31
Q

Illocutionary (10-12 months)

A

Awareness of communication, means to achieve a goal, still lacking rich locutionary content

32
Q

Locutionary (12 months and onward)

A

Developing linguistic content and sound-object mapping, may be accompanied by gestures

33
Q

Commonalities between pidgin and L1

A
  • Simplified output

- For presumably efficient communication

34
Q

Differences between pidgin and L1

A

Pidgin influenced by speakers’ L1, both phonologically, lexically, syntactically

35
Q

Speech Learning Model (Jim Flege)

A
  • Phonetic similarity between L1 and L2 sound categories
  • Formation of new sound categories
  • New, similar, same
  • Focus primarily on production
36
Q

Perceptual Assimilation Model (Cathy Best)

A

Primarily on perception of phonemic contrasts

37
Q

N400

A

Semantic anomaly, last word either semantically congruent or incongruent for context (ex: waterfall)

38
Q

P600

A

Syntactic anomaly, garden path effect, elicited by hearing or reading grammatical errors or other syntactic anomalies

39
Q

Mismatch Negativity (MMN)

A

Detection of change, occurs when there is an odd stimulus in a sequence of stimuli