Final Exam Flashcards
Tenacity
- Superstition/habit
- Info may not be accurate/No method for correcting
Authority
- Find answers by seeking out an authority on the subject
- Quickest/easiest way to obtain answers
- (doctors, parents, lawyers)
- not all “experts” are experts, personal opinion/biases
Rationalism
- Logical reasoning
- Begin with set of known facts/assumptions
- Even if logic is sound, the conclusion may not be true
Empiricism
- Direct observation or personal experience
- Too much confidence in observations
- Perceptions can drastically alter by prior knowledge, expectations, feelings, or beliefs
Inductive vs. deductive logic
- Inductive: small set of specific observations used for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible events.
- Deductive: General statement or set of statements as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples
Steps in the research process
- Observe
- General Hypothesis
- Research Hypothesis
- Evaluate
- Support, refute, or refine
Applied research
Research studies that are intended to answer practical questions or solve practical problems.
Basic research
Research studies that are intended to answer theoretical questions or gather knowledge simply for the sake of new knowledge.
Testable hypothesis
- possible to observe and measure all variables involved
Refutable hypothesis
- contrary results must be possible
- in other words, the hypothesis must be falsifiable
Informed consent
The ethical principle requiring the investigator to provide all available information about a study so that a participant can make a rational, informed decision regarding whether to participate in the study.
Active deception
- misleading participants about the specific purpose of the study.
Passive deception
- information is withheld from a participant.
Anonymity
the condition of being anonymous.
Confidentiality
the state of keeping or being kept secret or private.
Concurrent validity
The type of validity demonstrated when scores obtained from a new measure are directly related to scores obtained from more established measure of the same variable.
Divergent validity
- Two different methods to measure two different constructs.
- Convergent validity must be shown for each of the two constructs.
- There should be little to no relationship between the scores obtained for the two different constructs when they are measured by the same method.
Convergent validity
- Strong relationship between the scores obtained from two different methods of measuring the same construct.
Ratio
- The scale must have a true 0 point and ratios must be calculable
- E.g., height, weight, reaction time
Interval
- Scale must have equally-spaced units (distance along intervals equal)
- Zero is just a point on the scale (not absence of the construct)
- E.g., temperature, clock hour, psychological sclaes
- 1(strongly disagree) - 7(strongly agree)
Predictive validity
- Does my measure accurately predict behaviour?
Operational definitions
- A procedure for indirectly measuring and defining a variable that cannot be observed or measured directly.
- Specifies a measurement procedure (a set of operations) for measuring an external, observable behaviour and uses the resulting measurements as a definition and a measurement of the hypothetical construct.
Mean
A measure of central tendency obtained by adding the individual scores, then dividing the sum of the number of scores. The mean is the arithmetic average.
Test-retest
Successive measurements
Inter-rater
Simultaneous measurements
Split-half
Internal consistency
Developmental research design (Non-experimental & Quasi-experimental)
- Cross-sectional developmental
- Longitudinal developmental research design
Question types
- Open-ended
- Rating scale
Ordinal
- Order of cases important
- Data arranged in a rank position
- Can determine direction, but not magnitude, of differences; distances b/w ranks NOT equal
- Ex; Sales rep position (junior, middle, senior)
Nominal
- Not really a “scale” at all
- Categories of people, things; anything that can be grouped, and groups have no rank order
- No one can exist “between categories” (they are mutually exclusive)
- E.g., place of birth, occupation (when no status difference), colour preference, favourite TV show, Teams A vs. B vs. C etc.
Sample
relatively smaller group of individuals who participate in the study
Simple random sampling (Random)
- Randomly select participants from list containing total population
- Each individual has equal and independent chance of selection
Systematic sampling (Random)
- Select every nth participant from list containing total population after random start
Stratified random sampling (Random)
- Divide population into subgroups and randomly select equal numbers from each subgroup
Proportionate stratified random sampling (Random)
- Divide population into subgroups and randomly select from each subgroup so proportions in sample correspond to proportions in population
Cluster sampling (Random)
- Randomly select clusters from a list of all the clusters in the population
Convenience sampling (Nonrandom)
- Select individual participants who are easy to get
Quota sampling (Nonrandom)
- Identify subgroups to be included, then establish quotas for individuals to be selected through convenience
Range
Range = maximum value - minimum value
Standard deviation
- Used whenever mean is used as measure of central tendency
- Measures distance between each score and the mean
- To calculate, you need to first calculate the variance.
Variance
- Average squared distance from the mean.
Quasi-experimental (Strategies)
- Attempts to answer cause-effect questions about relationship between two variables, but answers tend to be ambiguous.
What is a z-score?
- A z-score is the number of standard deviations a score is from the mean.
- Any raw score can be turned into a z-score.
- When ALL of your raw scores are turned into z-scores, the mean of those scores will be 0, and the SD will equal 1.
- Two uses of the z-score:
1. Assessing the relative position of a score in a distribution
2. Assessing the probability of attaining a score or mean at or below, or higher, than that score or mean in the population.
Experimenter bias (Threats to validity)
- the findings of the of a study are influenced by the experimenter’s expectations or personal beliefs about the study’s outcome.
Reactivity (Threats to validity)
- participants modify their natural behaviour in response to the fact that they are aware they are being studied
- behaviour can change by being overly cooperative or defensive/uncooperative.
Confounding variable (Threats to validity)
- extraneous variable (usually unmonitored)
- changes systematically along with the two variables being studied.
- alternative explanation for observed relationships between the two variables.