Final Exam Flashcards
mutualism
+/+ 2 interactants benefit
mutualism example
ants + acacia: defend from eaters (like giraffes) and other sprouting new plants (that might suck acacia nutrients)clownfish + sea anemonedove and saguaro cactuslichens, fungi, algae
consumption
+/-three types:1. parasitism2. predation3. herbivory
consumption example
mistletoe + juniper: eats small amount of tissue, not necessarily fatal
parasitism
host lives for a while, parasite is smaller than host; lives off of living tissue (eventually host can die)
parasitism examples
ticks on mammals, ascaris round worms in intestines, mistletoe + juniper (eats small amount of tissue, not necessarily fatal)
predation
predator often larger, kills prey outright, eats it.
herbivory
animals eating plants, plant often survives
commensalism examples
frog + bromeliad leafflicker making its home in dead part of living sycamore treefungus that lives on insect without causing harm (ladybug)cattle agrets (birds) eating bugs stirred up by cattle
competition types
intraspecificinterspecific
intraspecific
same species / individuals competing for same limiting resource (studied by population biology: how species populations change over time)
interspecific
different species competing for same limiting resource
niche
pattern of resources and conditions a species tolerates; the role/way species make a living in an environment
habitat vs. niche
habitat: addressniche: occupation
one niche / what happens when species try to inhabit the same niche
only one species can be best in niche. ie, species of paramecium
what happened with paramecium
there was intraspecific competition, population growth/death over time in graph between 3 species; in time, only one species can live with limited resources in the same space, so one species thrives and one dies off significantly; when they do survive, it’s because of resource partitioning
gause’s principle (competitive exclusion principle)
in a test tube, the habitat is not uniform, so there is a zone of competition and certain species thrive in the top portion (more o2) and others in the bottom portion (more solutes)
competitive exclusion
ompetitive exclusion happens in both parts. With only one limiting factor species will compete for the resource with the stronger competitor driving the weaker competitor to extinction. This is called competitive exclusion.
fundamental niche
not competing; range of resources occupied in absence of competition
realized niche
range of resources occupied w/ (in presence of) competition
rocky intertidal
- semibalanus2. chthalamus (small, expanded when semibalanus removed)
character displacement
change in characteristics (morphology/physiology) occurring over generational time because of differentiation
community
a group of species interacting w/each other in one location
food web
eating each other
keystone species
influence the community much greater than its abundance suggests; therefore, its removal causes significant change (strong interaction between keystone species)
4 examples of keystone species
- pisaster ochraceous/mussels2. sea otters/sea urchins3. crabs/mangroves4. wolves/elk
pisaster ochraceous/
eat mussels (top predators), which keeps them in check; this opens up rocky habitat for other species. removal causes reduction in # of species “richness”
sea otters
eat sea urchins (eat all the kelp, predators); when removed, decline of kelp, all other species dependent on kelp (herbivores) would decline
crabs
crabs live there, eat the mangrove leaves (they chew through them) and accelerate nutrient cycling and primary production of plants and phytoplankton; mangroves: tropical salt water estuaries – safety and habitat for fish, nurseries; leaves don’t decompose there easily; when crabs removed: slow nutrient cycling, stops supporting ecosystem
wolves
move elk! Elk don’t graze as heavily on riparian areas (streams); streamside vegetation grows, increased habitat and diversity, lowers water temperature (shade); good for fish! when removed: less habitat, less fish because of increase in water temperature
top-down control
top predators exert control over the entire food web, remove the top predators, mid-level predators explode and eat up the herbivore/producers levels of the trophic pyramid (new concept)
bottom-up control
productivity of the producers determines the number of trophic levels and abundance at those levels (original idea)
trophic cascades
removal of species in food web that results in chain reaction in which the entire food web structure changes
sticky switches/stuck
a change in food web structure to a new stable equilibrium situation; generally not as easy to go back to previous equilibrium condition ex: (fisheries/cod)
Bay Shrimp fishery example
top down control; sharks: top predator: controls abundance of mid-level predators (rays), so the next trophic layer (herbivores, filter feeders like clams and oysters) are able to survive
proportional change for bay shrimp fishery
small: decline (clams)large: abundance increased of rays
removal of top predator results in
trophic cascade
trophic cascade
cascading effect in ecosystem, shift.
atlantic cod fishery
top-down control, trophic cascade;
adult cod
eat herring, mackerel (mid-level predators), eat their own babies and other cod1990’s: crash at the fishery to 1% of levelsmanagers stopped cod fishery, estimating it would take 5-6 years to recover (grow babies into adults)
how long it took actually
20 years to get back 30% recovery
why took so long?
because they were stuck in a new equilibrium
flow
humans eat all top level cod -> mid level predators increased in abundance, herring, mackerel, smaller fish -> eat all juvenile cod and larval cod -> never grow up to be large cod
clements
ordered succession
gleason
chance! dynamic. an element could affect it just by a fluke – another species could have been there first instead, and would have influenced everything afterward!
clementsian model
succession sequence is predictable succession leads to climax community (stable)co-evolved biotic interactions (strong)climate determines the biotic community that exists in a location