Final ANOVA study guide Flashcards

1
Q

type one error

A

rejecting a true null hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

alpha

A

type 1 error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

type 2 error

A

accepting a false null

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

beta

A

type 2 error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

decreased alpha leads to what

A

increased beta & vise versa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

increased type 2 error leads to

A

decreased level of significance, decreased type 1 error, less power, lacking ability to detect significance when it does exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

increased type 1 error leads to

A

increased level of significance, decreased type 2 error, greater power, increase likelihood of telling significant difference (power)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

power

A

probability of rejecting a false null hypothesis and obtaining a statistically significant result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

power equation

A

1-beta

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

if power =.8

A

find significance 80% of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ways to increase power

A

increase sample size, increase type 1 error rate, homogenous groups, intensify tx’s to observe greater differences, one tail over two tail, stronger design in pair t-test rather than pooled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

a decreased type 1 error

A

decreased power and less likely to tell significant differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

p < alpha

A

rejecting null

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

p > alpha

A

fail to reject null (retain it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Beta

A

probability that x has no effect when it does __ % of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

alpha

A

probability of concluding x has an effect when it does NOT __ % of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

power = .99

A

b=.01, effects of x truely have an effect on y, it will be detected 99% of the time

18
Q

CR Assumptions

A

variances are equall (homogeneity of variance), normally distributed across groups of DV , no outliers, indendence observed in design

19
Q

making F more robust

A

increase sample size

20
Q

post hoc liberal tests

A

greater power, increased type 1 error, greater ability to detect a significant difference when it does exist

21
Q

RM & RMF assumptions

A

independence observe in design, normally distributed DV, homogeneity of variance, sphercity (homo across p levels)

22
Q

If sphericity is violated and ANOVA is sig

A

researcher is confident in result, type 1 error < alpha

23
Q

increased type two error rate with violated sphericity

A

insig anova and –> less confidence in results

24
Q

CRF-pq assumptions

A

independence, normality across DV groups, homogenity of variances; tx combos=SS, interaction between Tx effects sig?, fix or random tx, no interatiion BTWN groups

25
SPF assumptions
independence, Tx level a normally distrubuted, tx a observations have equal variances, sphericity, no interaction between tx groups
26
ANCOVA assumptions
independence, normal distribution of tx a, equal variances of tx a, x & y relate but don't interact, w/in group reg coeff are equal, cov is w/o error & has no effect on IV
27
Regression & correlation assumptions
x has linear relationship with y, all important x's in model, all unnecessary x's (unrelated to y) not in model, data pair independence (x1 does not relate to x2)
28
specific regression assumptions
homoskedasity of residuals (check scatter plot & residual plots), residuals are normal (mean = 0), model is properly specified with above assumptions (R2 and eliminated no sig x's)
29
correlation assumptions
bivariate normality of x and y, even random dispersion of residuals
30
CR
one between, one indepent factor. no single person in multiple groups; one level of observation
31
RM
one within, subjects have commonality across all levels & recieve all tx's. one group with p levels of obvs.
32
CRF-pq
2 groups with one level, participants are not repeated in groups. looking at interaction. Main effect a is looking at significance of group 1 and then of group 2. SME looking at effect of gender specific to paper or electronic; looking at format specific to male & female
33
SPF
1 btwn 1 within. people take one group but complete all levels within group. take paper or electronic with all subjects (math, science, and english)
34
ANCOVA
look at effects of IV on DV when controlling for a continuous factor
35
are april ACT scores sig different for males or females?
CR, one between, one way
36
are dec and april act scores different across individuals?
RM, one within
37
is there an interaction between gender and course taken on April ACT scores?
CRF-pq (2-3)
38
are april ACT scores sig different for males and females in different courses?
CRF-pq (2-3)
39
does the tennis ball bounce differently depending upon court and swing?
crf-pq 22
40
are dec and april act scores sig dif for students in different courses?
spf
41
are april ACT scores different for students in different courses when taking into account practice ACT?
ANCOVA