Final: Alveolar Ridge Preservation Flashcards
What are the types of bone loss for Maxilla vs Mandible?
- Maxilla:
- Horizontal Resorption
- Mandible:
- Anterior=Horizontal
- Posterior=Vertical
Periodontium Anatomy
- Bundle Bone
- Cortical Bone
- Cancellous Bone
Bundle Bone
- Lines socket
- Directly connected to tooth structure
- Sharpeys fibers
- 1st to degrade after extraction
- Next to PDL of drifting teeth
- Alveolar Bone Proper
- Cribiform Plate
- Lamina Dura
Cortical Bone
- Aka: Compact Bone
- Outer wall of bone
- Continuous with bundle bone
- Dense & Strong
- Primarily Lamellar Bone
- Provides primary stability to implant
Cancellous Bone
- aka Spongy or Trabecular Bone
- Below Cortical Bone
- Radiographic appearance→Mesh work
- Trabeculae: Primarily lamellar bone
Alveolar Bone Loss
- Horizontal or Vertical defects
- occur due to
- tooth loss
- fractures
- pathology
- Compromise ideal implant placement→Unfavorable outcome
- occur due to
- Johnson:
- Fastet resorption: 1-6 months
- Carl & Perspm
- Most bone loss= 6-24 months
- Amler or Nevin
- Most tissue contour Loss: 1st month
- avg 3-5mm in width at 6 months
- Most tissue contour Loss: 1st month
- Ashman:
- Bone Shrinkage in 2-3 years:
- 40-60% of height and width
- Life Bone loss rate:
- 0.5-1.0%/year
- Bone Shrinkage in 2-3 years:
Alveolar Bone Loss Classification: Edentulous Jaw
A-E; A=normal
Socket Healing: Research Studies
- Araujo:
- Flap vs Flapless Ext=No Difference
- Scala
- Monkey Study
- Tan
- Systemic Review
- rapid reduction in first 3-6 months
- Chappus
- Facial Bone wall > 1mm (Bone Loss 1.1 mm)
- Facial Bone wall ≤ 1mm (Bone loss 7.5 mm)
- Schropp
- Ext Posterior Teeth
- Lose 50% of width in 12 months
- ⅔ in 3 months
- Farmer:
- Ext anterior teeth (Esthetic zone)
- Lose 15% width in 6-8 weeks
- Greatest bone loss= Coronal & Vertical
- Cardaropoli:
- Dog teeth
Ridge Preservation
- Aka:
- site preservation
- Socket preservation
- minimize vertical and horizontal ridge alterations in post-ext sites
- Decreases bone resorption
- DOES NOT PREVENT
- Decreases bone resorption
- No Superior Techniques
- No Flap ⇣ resorption rate
- No RP→ ⇡ orofacial dimension of bone
- Dimensional Changes within 6 months
- Mean horizontal reduction=3.8 mm
- Mean Vertical Reduction=1.24 mm
- Can Perform under a non-implant restoration to maintain tissue level
Ridge Preservation: Treatment Considerations
- Careful technique
- Minimal traumatic extraction
- careful elevation, lunation, and suturing (Criss-cross/Cruciate)
- Preserve Buccal Plate
- if damaged, repair during ext
- Section tooth if necessary
Why do we ant to preserve the ridge?
- Maintain:
- existing soft & hard tissue envelope
- stable ridge volume
- optimal fxn & esthetics
- Simplify subsequent tx
Ridge Preservation: Contraindications vs Indications
- Contraindications:
- Infection
- Radiation
- Bisphosphonates
- Indications:
- Implant placed at later time
- Contour ridge for conventional prosth tx
- Positive cost vs benefits
- Adolescents
Ridge Preservation: Clinical Recommendations
- Elevate Flap and Place:
- biomaterials
- ridge contour or barrier membrane
- Devices
- ridge contour
- biomaterials
- Primary Wound Closure
- no comparison studies
- soft tissue punch, CT graft, etc.
- no comparison studies
- Materials with low resorption and replacement rate
- No difference b/w materials (fillers, membranes)
- except collagen plug alone
- No difference b/w materials (fillers, membranes)
What are the different types of bone grafts?
- Autograft
- Allograft
- Xenograft
- Alloplast
Autograft
- Same person
- Intraoral or extraoral
- Tuberosity
- chin
- ramus
- calvarium
- tibia
- iliac crest
- Intraoral or extraoral
- osteogenesis
- osteoconduction
- osteoinduction
Allograft
- From Different person
- DFDBA, FDBA, Puros
- Osteoinductive
- Osteoconductive
Xenograft
- From different species
- Bovine (Bio-Oss), Horse (Equimatrix)
- Osteoconductive
Alloplast
- Synthetic
- GEM21
- Osteoinductive
- Osteoconductive
Post-extraction Site Classifications:
- Class I
- Intact Extraction Site
- favorable anatomical conditions
- Class 2
- Intact Extraction Site
- partially favorable anatomical conditions
- Class 3:
- Partially Compromised Extraction Site
- unfavorable anatomical conditions
- Class 4:
- Severely Compromised Extraction Site
- Unfavorable anatomical conditions
Class 1 Post-Extraction Site Classification
- Intact Extraction Site
- Favorable Anatomical Conditions
- Buccal cortical Plate
- Intact or ≤ 20% wall damage
- Soft Tissue Level
- Optimal
- Bone Anatomy
- Good for 3D implant position & Primary Stability
Class 2 Post-Extraction Site Classification
- Intact Extraction Site
- Partially Favorable Anatomical Conditions
- Buccal cortical Plate
- Intact or ≤ 20% wall damage
- Soft Tissue Level
- Optimal
- Bone Anatomy
- Difficult Implant Position & Primary Stability due to
- Perio defects and lesions
- Adjacent anatomical structures
- maxillary sinus floor
- IAN
- nasopalatine canal
- Difficult Implant Position & Primary Stability due to
Class 3 Post-Extraction Site Classification
- Partially compromised Extraction Site
- Unfavorable Anatomical Conditions
- Buccal cortical Plate
- 20-50% resorption
- Soft Tissue Level
- Suboptimal
- soft tissue inflammation
- thin and scalloped gingival phenotype
- Suboptimal
- Bone Anatomy
- Good for 3D implant position & Primary Stability
Class 4 Post-Extraction Site Classification
- Severely compromised Extraction Site
- Unfavorable Anatomical Conditions
- Buccal cortical Plate
- > 50% resorption
- Soft Tissue Level
- Suboptimal
- soft tissue inflammation
- thin and scalloped gingival phenotype
- Suboptimal
- Bone Anatomy
- Difficult implant position & Primary Stability due to:
- perio defects & lesions
- adjacent structures
- Maxillary sinus floor
- IAN
- Nasopalatine canal
- Difficult implant position & Primary Stability due to:
Socket Shield Technique
- Leave natural buccal root of tooth
- place implant in it
Dehiscence
- A Slice without coronal bone
Fenestration
- a window apical of coronal bone
- intact coronal bone
How does a socket extraction remodel over time?
- Contains clots then osteoblasts
- Day 14=Woven Bone
- Until bone is completely filled at Day 180
What is the rationale for alveolar ridge preservation?
- Place implants later
- Contour ridge for conventional prosthetic tx
- positive cost to benefits
- adolescents
Which materials are used for alveolar ridge preservation?
- Autografts
- Allografts
- Xenografts
- Alloplasts
Socket Healing After Extraction
- Day 7-14:
- Granulation Tissue w/bundle bone degradation
- Day 30:
- Lamellar bone starts to form
- Day 60
- More Fat Deposition
- Day 90:
- Good amount of bone
Ridge Augmentation Techniques
- Distraction Osteogenesis
- high risk of infection & failure
- Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)
- Block Autograft
- Block Allograft
- Ridge Split Techniques
- Combination
Guided Bone Regeneration
- Use barrier membranes to direct growth of new bone & soft tissue
- sites w/insufficient volumes or dimensions
- used for fxn, esthetics, or restoration
- Based on Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) principles
- Introduced by Dahlin
- rats
- 1988
GBR Regeneration Process
- Blood Clot
- Angiogenesis
- develop new blood vessels
- Granulation Tissue
- Osteogenic cells migrate
- periphery→center
- Deposits woven bone
- Lamellar bone forms
- Remodeling
- resembles bone growth
GBR: PASS Principle
- Primary Closure
- periosteal releasing incision
- remove membranes after 4-6 mos
- Angiogenesis (Blood Flow)
- formation of new BVs
- Stability
- Suture and anchor membrane and flaps
- Space Maintenance
- membrane b/w bone graft and gingiva
What is the Principle of Combination Therapy
- Membrane
- provides barrier
- Graft
- scaffold
- space maintenance
Ideal Membrane Characteristics
- Biocompatible
- Cell Occlusiveness
- Tissue Integration
- protect blood clot
- wound stabilized
- Space making
- for progenitor cells
- Manage Clinical
- Facilitate migration and proliferation of progenitor cells
- Bacterial infection resistant
Types of Barrier Membranes
- Non-Resorbable
- ePTFE, dPTFE
- socket grafting)
- Millipore
- Cellulose acetate
- Titanium
- ePTFE, dPTFE
- Resorbable:
- Collagen
- Synthetic: PLA, PGA, PLGA
- ADM
New Membranes
- Alginate
- New degradable copolymers
- Hybrid or nanofibrous membranes
- Amniotic membranes
Porosity Principle
-
Porosity
- 50-100 um → Bone ingrowth
- > 100 um (101-150)→ High vascular tissue
- > 150 um→ Bone with osteons
GBR vs GTR
- GBR
- on edentulous ridges
- GTR
- around teeth
Osteogenesis
- cells in graft form new bone
Osteoinduction
- Chemical Process
- BMPs convert neighboring cells→ osteoblasts→form Bone
- BMPs=molecules in graft
Osteoconduction
- Physical Effect
- Graft Matrix forms scaffold
- outside cells penetrate the graft → form new bone
Osteopromotion
- Materials that support:
- wound healing
- tissue regeneration
- do not initiate de novo tissue formation
Autograft
- Same person
- intraoral or extraoral
- tuberosity, chin, ramus, calvarium, tibia, iliac crest
- osteogenesis
- osteoconduction
- osteoinduction
Allograft
- From a different person
- DFDBA, DFBA, Puros
- Osteoinductive
- Osteoconductive
Xenograft
- From a different species
- Bovine (Bio-Oss), Horse (Equimatrix)
- Osteoconductive
Alloplasts
- Synthetic
- GEM21
- osteoinductive
- osteoconductive
Growth Factors
- GFs
- rhBMP2
- PDGF-BB
- FGF2
- Controversial Evidence
- Rapid Clearance→ insufficient GF conc in bone defects
- Deliver w/supra-physiological non-standard doses → therapeutic efficacy
Neo-osteogenesis
- de novo bone formation beyond genetic skeletal envelope
- achieved by applying GBR principle
Factors that Influence GBR Success
- Patient Factors
- smoking
- Excessive Swelling
- Passive Flap tension
- Cortical Penetration
- Defect morphology
- length
- angle
- Membrane fixation
- Materials used
- Horizontal Augmentation
- predictable and successful
- Vertical Augmentation
- More challenging
- Less than horizontal gain
- Decreased implant success & survival
Block Graft
- Block Graft vs GBR
- Greater Ridge Width Gain
- Lower Implant Success
- Block Graft vs Autogenous Particular Graft
- Greater:
- bone to implant contact
- Bone Fill
- Less Mean height Gain
- Greater:
Khoury’s Split Bone Block Technique
- Bone Block + GBR
Ti-Mesh Membranes
- Titanium Meshes
- used w/particulate bone for large defects
- oxide layer promotes
- cell colonization
- differentiation of osteogenic lines
- Not mainstrem
- technique sensitive
- Cost
Alveolar Ridge Split (ARS)
- Splits crest cortical bone
- creates horizontal dimensions
- immediate or delayed implant placement
- can be combined with GBR
- Only D3 or D4 bone Types
GBR: Other Principles
-
Thin layer of soft-tissue ingrowth
- under the membrane
- initial blood clot shrinks→air entrapped or membrane micromovement
-
Micromovement:
- Fibrous Tissue
Alveolar Ridge Split: 4 Anatomical Requirements
- Minimal horizontal bone width= 2 mm
- Minimal Vertical Bone Height=10 mm
- No concavity
- Horizontal osteotomes ≥ 1mm from tooth
Guided Implant Surgery: General Info
- Developed in Mid 1990s
- CBCT allowed:
- volumetric jaw bone imaging
- low cost and radiation
- Large amount of info pre-op
- available bone volume and quality
- location of anatomy and pathology
- volumetric jaw bone imaging
- Completely planned pre-op
Guided Implant Surgery: Workflow
Exam→Planning→Execution
Guided Implant Surgery: Examination & Limits
- requires CBCT
- used with flap and flapless approach
- No Flap=No Graft
- Edentulous vs partially edentulous patients
- Edentulous:
- 1 Scan System:
- create radiopaque resin replica of pts prosthesis
- 2 Scan System: (Dual scan w/Fiducial Markers)
- 1st-with prosthesis markers & Bite registration
- 2nd- with prosthesis markers
- 1 Scan System:
- Partial Edentulous:
- Virtual Computerized Prosthetic Wax-up
- Scan analogue or cast
- data superimposed on CBCT
- Edentulous:
- Limits:
- Prosthetic Thickness for correct segmentation
- artifacts
- Motion-during CBCT
- Metal
- Correct tooth setup
- Incorrect
- fiducial markers (Double-scan)
- Matching of scan and CBCT
Implant Placement: Pitfalls
- Patient movement while drilling
- Limited surgery time due to LA
- restricted visual field
- mental transfer of 2D x-ray to 3D
- Esthetics
- Biomechanics
- Functional Constraints of prosthesis
Guided Implant Surgery Involves:
- CBCT
- extraoral and intraoral scanners
- rapid prototyping and 3D printing
- Guided Surgery
Guided Implant Surgery: Planning & Limits
- 3rd party software
- plan implant placement and fixation pins/screws
- Digital info→ produce stent with analogue method or CAM rapid prototyping (Milling or 3D printing)
- Limits:
- not enough inter arch space
- Unavailable Drill lengths (Drills to long)
- Thin guide material→ Break
- Printing Angulation Error (0.25-1.5°)
Guided Implant Surgery: Execution & Limits
- Try guide in mouth before surgery
- bite index, mini-screws, fixation pins and temp implants can be used
- punch technique-Flapless approach
- Drill Keys-Drills w/physical or visual stop
- Accuracy:
- Limits:
- Rotated guide→Inaccurate implant position
- Fix with bite index
- check Occlusal of guide
- Local anesthesia changes mucosa
- Depth (Most significant error)
- Debris within osteotomy
- Deformed Guide
- Low gray values
- Rotated guide→Inaccurate implant position
Accuracy
- difference b/w the:
- planned (what you want) and
- inserted (what you actually got) implant placement
- 4 parameters (Deviation of the __) (Van Ash/Tahm)
- entry point (0.99/0.9 mm)
- Apex (1.24/1.39 mm)
- Long Axis (3.81 /3.5°)
- Depth
- Guide vs no guide:
- Significant Deviation
- Guides: Tooth supported> Mucosa supported> Bone supported
What are the main steps to plan a guided surgery?
- CBCT
- extra/intraoral scanners
- 3D printing
What are the indications of guided surgery?
- Limited Mouth Opening
- No flap needed
- Have Time to plan
- Whenever you can do it
What are the limitations of guided surgery?
- Correct and accurate images
- Insufficient arch space
- cumulative deviation
- mucosal changes
- deviation of depth
- breaking of guide
Peri-Implant Health
- No Inflammation
- No BOP
- No Suppuration
- No ⇡ PDs
- No Bone Loss
- only bone remodeling
Peri-Implant Mucositis
- BOP
- Suppuration-maybe
- No PD Change
- with or without
- No Bone Loss
Peri-Implant Implantitis
- BOP
- Suppuration-maybe
- ⇡ PD
- Bone Loss
- if no previous exam data:
- BOP
- Suppuration (maybe)
- PD ≥ 6mm
- Bone Level ≥ 3mm apical to most coronal intraosseous part of implant
Peri-Implant Hard and Soft Tissue Deficiences
- Hard Tissue
- Before Implant Placement
- Systemic Diseases
- Tooth Loss
- Trauma
- Trauma from Tooth Extraction
- Periodontitis
- Endo Infection
- Longitudinal Root Fractures
- Posterior Maxilla Bone Height
- After Implant Placement
- Systemic Diseases
- Healthy Defects
- Implant Malposition
- Peri-implantitis
- Mechanical Overload
- Soft Tissue Thickness
- Before Implant Placement
- Soft Tissue:
- Before Implant placement:
- Systemic Diseases
- Tooth Loss
- Periodontal Disease
- After:
- No Buccal Bone
- Papilla Height
- Keratinized Tissue
- Tooth Migration
- Life-Long Skeletal Changes
- Before Implant placement:
Peri-implantitis vs Peri-mucositis: Etiology & Tx
- Mucositis:
- Etiology: Xs Cement (86%)
- remove XS and GBR
- Implantitis:
- Etiology: Plaque
- mechanical debridement
- resolves in 3 weeks
Clinical Differences b/w healthy periodontal and peri-implant tissues
- No visual differences
- PD:
- Implant > Tooth
- Interproximal Papilla:
- Implant=Shorter
What does a peri-implant exam consist of?
- Inflammation:
- visual
- probing
- BOP
- PD
- Mucosal Margin migration
- Palpation
Ailing Implant vs Failing Implant vs Failed Implant
- Ailing:
- No Mobility
- No Inflammation
- Radiographic Bone Loss
- Failing Implant:
- No Mobility
- Inflammation
- Progressive Bone Loss
- Failed:
- Mobile
- Non-functional
- Need to remove
CIST
- Cumulative Interceptive Supportive Therapy
- Based one periodic diagnosis
- 4 Treatment Modalities:
- A= Mechanical
- B= Antiseptic Treatment
- C: Antibiotic Tx
- D: Regeneratie or resectie surgery
Peri-implant disease: Risk Factors
- Poor Plaque Control
- No Maintenace
- Smoking/Diabetes
- History of Perio
What should you do after finishing implant supported prosthesis?
- Baseline:
- radiographs
- PD
- Radiographs after loading period
- Bone Level Reference after remodeling
Patient Plaque Control around Implant
- Methods:
- Floss
- Sulcular Bass Brushing Technique
- Cleans under mucosa
- caution with Narrow WKG
- After osseointegration:
- Interdental Brush
- Rubber Tip
Professional Plaque Control around Implant
- Perio Maintenance:
- 3-4 months if tooth loss due to caries or perio
- Minimal Damage to transmucosal surfaces when removing plaque and calc
- ex: Polished titanium implant collar
- Gold or ceramic surfaces
- use most scalers and curettes w/no damage
- ex: Plastic, gold coated, stainless steel
- Metal Probe
- no concern→Minimal surface alteration
- Plastic Probe=Effective
- Rubber Cup & Polishing Paste
- remove biofilm
- machined and polished surfaces
- Ultrasonic Instruments w/metal tips
- Magnetostrictive or Pizoelectric
- ex: Cavitron
- Caution→Surface irregularities
- use special tip
- Magnetostrictive or Pizoelectric
- Friendly Materials for Abutment:
- Teflon
- Titanium
- Gold
- Plastic Tips
What to evaluate for Implant Prosthesis: At Delivery vs F/u Visits
- Delivery:
- Radiograph=Baseline
- Complete seating
- Implant Abutment Interface
- Cement retained
- No XS cement
- F/u Visits
- loose screws or fractures
- Replace:
- Loose screws & toque down
- worn out retentive parts
- Hader Clips
- Locator attachment inserts
- Replace:
- Occlusal guards
- loose screws or fractures
What are the main peri-implant diseases?
- Health
- Mucositis
- Implantitis
- Hard & Soft Tissue Defiicencies
What are the main treatment modalities for peri-implantitis?
- Mechanical Debridement
- Antiseptic Tx
- ANtibiotic Tx
- Regenerative or Resective Sx
Why does excess cement cause peri-implantitis?
- Allows bacterize to colonize→ ⇡Inflammation around implant
Types of Implant Complications?
- Biologic
- Esthetic
- Mechanical
Biologic Implant Complications
- Mucosal Inflammation
- Mucosal Hyperplasia
- Mobility
- BOP
- Suppuration
- ⇡ PD
- BL
- Thread Exposure
- Peri-implant diseases
- Pain
Esthetic Implant Complications
- Poor positioning
- Poor Restoration
- Poor Appearance
- inadequate tx planning
- Recession
- Hard & Soft Tissue Deficiency
Mechanical Implant Complication
- Screw Loose
- Screw Frature
- Meshwork Fracture
- Ceramic Fracture
- Implant Fracture
Prosthetic Design
- Proper Assessment
- crucial for dx and tx plan
- proper emergence profile
- Innaccurate assessment
- Prosthesis Misfit
- Passive Misfit ⇡Burden on Bone
- Bacteria Colonize space b/w prosthesis
- Biocompatabilty
- Zirconia > Metal
- Prosthesis Misfit
Excess Cement
- Peri-implantitis (81%)
- Increase:
- Plaque
- Bleeding index
- Suppuration
- Fistula
- Increase:
- Radiographs can’t detect
- Cement Types→ proliferation of bacterial strains
- Impossible to remove all excess when abutment margin≥ 1 mm subg
Types of Cement
- Methacrylate
- Bacterial Colonization
- Zinc Oxide Non-Eugenol
- Less host response in vitro
What are some techniques to minimize excess cement?
- Teflon Tape
- Venting
- Dual Cord
- Dummy abutment
Cemented retained vs Screw Retained Complications
- Cemented Retained
- BIologic complications
- plaque control to prevent
- BIologic complications
- Screw Retained
- Technique Complication
- preferred due to:
- retrievability
- High Biologic compatibility
What are some crucial factors for cement retained restorations?
- Implant position
- Abutment selection
- Retention Design
- Margin Position
Fracture and Loosening?
- Facilitate Peri-implant disease
- bacteria colonize spaces
Lack of Keratinized Mucosa
- Increase:
- Plaque accumulation
- inflammation
- recession
- attachment loss
- Increase Keratinized Tissue w/Tissue Graft
- Reduce Gingival Complications:
- physical compression
- contact w/ restorative material
- Biofilm
- Reduce Gingival Complications:
Open Contacts
- Proximal Contact tightness Decreases overtime
- replace restoration
- Modify restoration
- restore adjacent tooth
- associated w/peri-implantitis
Retrograde implantitis
- Previous RCT on Adjacent teeth
- not curetted well after extraction
Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: History
- Boyne & James: 1980
- first published technique
- Tatum: 1986
- crestal approach
- Summers: 1994
- Osteotome technique
- Sinus Consensus: 1996
- predictable & effective
Alternatives to Sinus Augmentation
- RPD
- Fixed Bridges
- Cantilevers
- Implants:
- Short
- Zygomatic
- Tilted
Maxillary Sinus Anatomy:
- Shape:
- Pyramidal
- Membrane:
- Lined by Pseudostratified columnar epithelium
- periosteum→ Schneiderin Membrane (0.3-0.8m)
- Lined by Pseudostratified columnar epithelium
- Size: 12-15 mL
- Dimensions:
- Length: 38-45 mm
- Height: 26-45 mm
- Width: 25-35 mm
- Septa:
- Normally In premolar Area
- Ostium
- 40 mm from floor
- 6 walls:
- Anterior
- Posterior
- Superior
- Inferior
- Medial
- Lateral
Maxillary Sinus Function
- Warm Air
- Lighten Head
- Voice Resonance
- Dissipate Heat
Sinus Anatomy Classification
Height from alveolar crest
- SA-1
- > 12 mm
- SA-2
- 10-12 mm
- SA-3
- 5-10 mm
- SA-4
- <5 mm
Sinus Augmentation: Indications vs Contraindications
- Indications:
- Posterior Maxilla Lacks vertical dimension
- alveolar ridge resorption
- sinus pneumatization
- Posterior Maxilla Lacks vertical dimension
- Contraindications:
- Relative:
- Treatable sinus pathology
- Smoking
- Absolute:
- Treated Sinus pathology that left irreversible dysfxn
- Relative:
Pre-Op Sinus Evaluation
- Medical Contra-indication
- CBCT Scan
- ENT Consult
- sinus problems
- Destructive sinus surgery
- Delay Sinus Surgery due to:
- nasal congestion
- sinusitis
- Respiratory Tract Infection
- Sinus pathology 30%
- Thickend mucosa (65%)
Pre-Op Sinus Medicines
- Antibiotics:
- Amoxicillin
- Clindamycin
- Can be mixed in graft
- 1:4 (Antibiotic:Graft)
- Decongestants
- maintain patent ostium
- Oxymetazoline (Afrin)
- Pseudoephedrine
- Anti-inflammatory
- Decreased edema & post-op pain
- Medrol dose pack
- Ibuprofen 800 mg
- Analgesics
- Hydrocodone w/acetaminophen (Vicoden)
- Codeine w/Acetaminophen (Tylenol #3)
Surgical Technique
- Osteotome (transcrestal)
- SA-2 and SA-3
- Lateral Approach (Window)
- SA-3 and SA-4
Osteotome Technique
- Aka Transcrestal
- SA-2 and SA-3
- Instrument: OSteotomes
- Curved tip
- straight or angled
- Curved tip
- Implant Survival Rate:
- Bone Height:
- ≥ 5mm = 96%
- < 4 mm = 86%
- Bone Height:
- Advantages:
- less
- invasive
- painful
- risk of infection
- less
- Disadvantages:
- Blind
- perforation
- Lack Control
Osteotome Technique: Advantages vs Disadvantages
- Advantages:
- Less
- Invasive
- risk of infeciton
- painful
- overhead
- Less
- Disadvantages:
- Lack control
- Blind
- Membrane perforation
Osteotome Technique: Research studies
- Implant Survival Rate:
- Bone Height ≥ 5mm → 96%
- Bone Height < 4 mm → 86%
Lateral Approach
- Aka Window
- S3-S4
- More invasive
- direct vision of sinus
- Instruments:
- Pizoelectric surgery
- Sinus Elevators
- Kerrison Rongeur
Osteotome vs Lateral Approach:
Bone Height Gain
Success Rate
- Osteotome:
- Bone Height Gain: 3.5 mm
- Success Rate: 95%
- Lateral Approach:
- Bone Height Gain: 12.7 mm
- Success Rate: 100%
Pizoelectric Sinus Elevation
- Reduced perforation risk
- Ultrasonic Vibrations
- Hydropneumatic pressure
Sinus Augmentation: Risks and Complications
During Surgery
Early Post Op
Late Post op
- During Surgery:
- Sinus mucosa perforation
- Schneiderin Membrane perforation (most common)
- Fracture ridge
- Obstruct Ostium
- Inadequate Fill
- Bleeding
- Damage teeth
- Sinus mucosa perforation
- Early Post-op
- Wound Dehiscence
- Acute Sinusitis
- Exposed membrane
- Lose implant or graft
- Late Post-op
- insufficient quality or quantity of bone forming in sinus graft
- oro-antral fistula
- Chronic bone pain
- remove implant
- Chronic Sinus Disease
Sinus Perforation
- Incidence: 10-30%
- Pizo reduces to 7%
- Causes:
- Tear membrane during prep
- Fracture window
- Elevate membrane
- Septa or pathologic conditions
- Very thin membrane
- Increase risk of infection
- delay implant placement
- contaminated mucosa in graft
What nerves innervate the maxillary sinus
- Superior Alveolar N
- Infraorbital N.
What Blood Vessels Innervate the maxillary sinus?
- Posterior Superior Alveolar A.
- Infraorbital A.
- Posterior Lateral Nasal A.
Amoxicillin
- Pre-op med
- 1g 1hr before surgery
- 500 mg qid 5-7 days
Clindamycin
- Pre-op Med
- 300 mg 1 hr before surgery
- 150 mg tid 5-7 days
Oxymetazoline
- aka Afrin
- Decongestant
- 1 hour before surgery until
- 2 days after surgery
Pseudoephedrine
- decongestant
- 1 tablet tid on day of surgery
- 2 days after surgery if perforation
Ibuprofen
- Anti-inflammatory
- 800 mg
- 1 tablet tid 7 days after surgery
What can cause a Sinus perforation
- Tear membrane during prep
- Fracture window
- Elevate membrane
- Septa or pathologic conditions
- Very thin membrane