Biology & Biomechanics of dental Implants Flashcards
How is bone classified?
- Compact/Cortical
- Trabecular/Cancellous
Compact Bone
- Aka Cortical Bone
- Dense & strong
- Give implant primary stability
Trabecular Bone
- Aka Cancellous Bone
- Fibrous Looking
- Provides blood flow & healing
What are the different types of bone? How do they differ?
- Types:
- Lamellar bone
- Woven Bone
- Bundle Bone
- Different
- arrangement ofcollagen fibril
- Mineral content
Woven Bone
- Disorganized form during healing
- Highly cellular
- Low Mineral content
- More pliable than mature lamellar bone
- Formed by osteoprogenitor cells near blood vessels
- during prenatal development, growth, healing
- can stabilize an unloaded implant
- can’t handle functional loading (weak)
Lamellar Bone
- Primary Load-bearing tissue
- Main component of mature cortical and trabecular bone
- Highly organized
- orientation of collagen fibrils: 1 direction
- differ from one layer to another
- orientation of collagen fibrils: 1 direction
- Dense Mineralized matrix
Bundle Bone
- Lines Socket
- directly connected to tooth structure (Sharpey’s fibers)
- first to degrade after extraction
- Next to PDL of physiologically drifting teeth
Bone Density Classification:
- Description
- Tactile Analog
- Typical Anatomical Location
- affects initial stability of implant → osseointegration
- D1 (most dense)
- Dense cortical bone
- marrow spaces barely visible
- anterior mandible
- very difficult to drill
- Dense cortical bone
- D2
- Thick porous cortical bone
- coarse trabecular bone
- anterior & posterior Mandible
- anterior Maxilla
- Thick porous cortical bone
- D3
- Thin porous cortical bone
- fine trabecular bone
- Anterior & posterior maxilla
- Posterior Mandible
- Thin porous cortical bone
- D4 (least dense)
- fine trabecular bone (primarily)
- very thin cortical bone
- posterior maxilla
- Big marrow spaces
- poor initial stability of implant
- fine trabecular bone (primarily)
Bone Volume Classification
- Compact Cortical
- Thick cortical surrounds highly trabecular bone
- Thin cortical surrounds highly trabecular bone
- Thin Cortical bone and spongy core
Define: Osseointegration
- direct connection b/w ordered, living bone & surface of load-carrying implant
- structural & functional
Define: Fibre-osseous integration
- Presence of CT b/w implant and bone
What are the different types of bone tissue response?
- Distance osteogenesis
- Contact osteogenesis
Distance osteogenesis
- bone healing moves toward the implant
- from edge of osteotomy to the implant
- bone does not grow directly on implant
Contact Osteogenesis
- Bone-guiding cells
- migrate through clot matrix to implant surface
- Bone forms quickly on implant surface
Implant: Healing Process
-
2 Hours:
- Socket filled w/coagulum from blood
- Peripheral threads→Primary stability
-
Day 4:
- Coagulum is exchanged for mesenchymal fibroblast cells
- osteoclasts on bone surface
-
Week 1
- Provisional matrix for woven bone & osteoblasts appear
- new bone contacts implant surface
-
Week 2:
- A lot of new bone around the implant
- vascular structures appear
-
Week 4:
- Lamellar bone appears
- Central Bone is filled with primary spongiosa and vascular structures
-
Week 6:
- 1° and 2° osteons are present in new bone
- continued remodeling of lamellar bone
Osseointegration Factors
- Implant biocompatibility
- Design
- Surface
- Host Bed State
- Surgical technique
- Loading conditions
Implant Biocompatability: Osseointegration Factor
- surface oxide properties
- Titanium
- Titanium alloy
- Corrosion resistant
- Load bearing capacity
Implant Design (Macrostructure)
-
Threaded vs cylinder
-
Threaded/screwed
- 3 parameters:
- Shape
- Pitch (distance of full thread turn)
- Depth (b/w root and crest of thread)
- promote osseointegration
- more functional for stress distribution
- 3 parameters:
-
Cylindrical
- press fit root form implants
- depend on coating or surface condition for microscopic retention
-
Threaded/screwed
- Thickness
-
Platform Switching
- smaller abutment on larger collar
- helps move inflammation away from bone
-
Tissue vs bone level implant
- tissue level implant
- posterior region (non-esthetic)
- large taper at top
- tissue level implant
Implant Surface
- rough vs smooth
- rough: more bone grown
- greater bone to implant contact
- rough: more bone grown
- Type of treatments:
- turned/machined
- sand blasted
- acid etched
*
Tooth vs Implant:
-Connection, Junctional epithelium, Connective Tissue, Biological Width, Vascularity, Probing depth, Bleeding of Probing
Tooth vs Implant
-diseased implants
- Implants
- high survival rate
- superior option to replace teeth
- biological and mechanical complications
- Diseased implants
- same treatment for natural teeth
- not as successful
- same treatment for natural teeth
Implant Host tissues
- Weaker Sulcular attachment→ ⇡BW → ⇡PD
- implant PD: 4-5 mm
- Ankylosis in bone
- Circular & Parallel CT fibers
- poor CT adhesion
- No PDL
- occlusal loads transferred directly to bone
- Overload=Bone Loss
- especially Lateral Forces
- Overload=Bone Loss
- occlusal loads transferred directly to bone
- gingival Fibers:
- parallel to long axis
- do not attach
-
decreased vascularity→ Slower Healing
- Unpredictable tissue regeneration
- Less reliable BOP
- Plaque/Bacteria→Greater Inflammatory Response→ More susceptible to tissue & bone loss
Implants: Vertical Height from the Occlusal Surface to the Crest
- ⇡Crown Height= ⇡stress on alveolar crest= Lever Arm
Implant Diameter
- Wider Diameter → ⇡ surface area of bone to implant contact → ⇡ stress distribution → ⇣MD and BL cantilever
- Narrower implants in high stress areas
- Mechanical implant failure or implant fracture
Splinting Implants vs teeth
- Implants:
- Improves stress distribution
- Indication
- high occlusal load areas
- More difficult:
- oral hygiene
- make a passively fitting prosthesis
- No PDL; osseointegrated
- Teeth
- PDL
- allows vertical & horizontal movement
- PDL
- Splinting implants to teeth
- increases stress at the neck of implant
- Crestal bone loss
Factors causing marginal bone loss around implants
- Infectious process
- excessive loading conditions
- Location, shape, and size of the implant-abutment micro gap and its microbial contamination
- Biologic width geometry
- implant surface roughness
- Peri-implant inflammatory infiltrate
- Micro-movement of implant and prosthetic components
- repeating screwing & unscrewing
- Traumatic surgical technique
Platform Switching
- use smaller abutment on larger collar
- inflammation moves away from bone
- promotes Bone remodeling
- if no platform switching= 1-2 mm bone loss
Implant Success Criteria
- A & Zarb
- immobile implant
- no evidence of peri-implant radiolucency
- Mean vertical bone loss < 0.2 mm after 1 year
- no pain, discomfort, infection, neuropathy, parasthesia, violation of mandibular canal or sinus drainage\
- S & Zarb
- Implant design allows satisfactory restoration
- to dentist & patient,
- Implant design allows satisfactory restoration
Implant: Causes of Failure
- Mechanical
- screw loosening/fracture
- cement failure
- framework fracture
- Biologic
- loss of osseointegration
- sensory disturbances
- peri-implant mucositis
- Biological
- patient related (medical history)
- surgical reasons
- Microbiological reasons
- Biomechanical:
- early loading
- micro movement during healing
- overloading
Occlusal Forces on Implants
- All applied to crystal bone (no PDL)
- avg 0.1 mm lost/year to non-axial forces (lateral forces)
- How to compensate:
- Maxillary implants:
- reduce palatal contour on crown
- Mandibular Implants:
- reduce buccal contour on crown
- Maxillary implants:
- Flatter cusps are more ideal
- evenly distribute forces
When to use radiographs (PA, PAN, CBCT) during the implant process?
- Initial Exam
- PAN
- Pre-op site exam
- CBCT to observe residual alveolar ridge (RAR)
- ID anatomy
- CBCT to observe residual alveolar ridge (RAR)
- Post-op:
- PA if no problems
- CBCT if problems
- When to use CBCT:
- Bone augmentation for implant placement
- Mobile implant
- Implant retrieval
What are the different types of dental implants?
- Subperiosteal
- Transosteal
- Endosteal
Subperiosteal Implants
- 1940s
- metal framework
- on top of jawbone w/transmucosal posts
- Needs flap reflection
Transosteal Implants
- Through Jaw
- Place anterior to mental foramen
- Extraoral approach
Endosteal Implants
- alloplastic material
- inside residual ridge
- prosth foundation
- 3 forms:
- Blade
- Cylinder (Aka press fit)
- screw (Aka Threaded)
Root Form Dental Implants
- Type of endosteal implants
- use vertical column of bone (like root of tooth)
- most common design
- Implant body & abutment placed separate
Label 1-4 on picture
- Definitive Prosthesis
- Retaining screw→ connects abutment to implant body
- Abutment→ connects implant body to definitive prosthesis
- Implant Body
What are the different parts of the implant body?
- Platform
- Body
- Apex
- Inner Threading
What are the different platforms that can be used on an implant body?
- External Platform
- Morse Taper
- Internal Platform
What is this?
External Platform (implant body)
What is this?
Internal Platform
What is this?
More Taper (Platform)
What is this?
Blade Implants (type of endosteal implant)
What is this?
Cylinder or Press Fit Implant
(Endosteal implant)
What is this?
Blade Implant
(type of endosteal implant)
What is this?
Screw/Threaded Implants
(type of endosteal implant)
Implant: Indications vs Contraindications
- Indications:
- can’t wear a removable or complete denture
- need for long-span fixed prosthesis w/questionable prognosis
- unfavorable number & location of tooth abutments
- Single tooth loss that requires prep of minimal or non-restored teeth for fixed prosthesis
- Contraindications:
- Acute or terminal Illness
- Uncontrolled metabolic disease (a1c>7.5)
- Radiation therapy
- Bisphosphonates or bone sparing agents (prolia)
- Unrealistic patient expectations
- Operator lack experience
- lack of vertical space
- can’t restore w/prosthesis
The increase need and use of implant treatment result from what factors?
- older population living longer
- tooth loss due to age
- Fixed prosthesis failure
- anatomical consequences of edentulism
- poor performance of removable prosthesis
- psychy of tooth loss
- needs & desires of baby boomers
- Implant supported prostheses:
- predictable
- long term
- increased public awareness
- advantages of implant supported restorations
Single Tooth Replacement: Implant vs FPD
- FPD:
- avg life span= 10 years (50% survival)
- caries=most common cause of failure
- Abutment teeth
- 15% require endo
- Failure rate:
- 8-12% at 10 years
- 30% at 15 years
- Implant: (advantages)
- High success rate (>97% at 10 years)
- Adjacent teeth Decreased risk of:
- caries
- endo problems
- abutment tooth loss
- cold or contact sensitivity
- Improved:
- edentulous bone maintenance
- esthetics of adjacent teeth
- easier to clean proximal surfaces of adjacent teeth
- Psychological advantage
Anatomical Consequences of Edentulism
- Close relationship b/w tooth and alveolar process continues throughout life
- Wolffs Law
- bone remodels due to forces applied
- Modified bone function→ change in internal architecture and external configuration
- Tooth is lost→ No stimulation of bone→ ⇣ Trabeculae & bone density in the area
- Lose Bone Volume: Width→Height
- Wolffs Law
- Complete or Partial Denture (removable)
- does not stimulate or maintain bone
- accelerates bone loss
- greater rate in poor fitting denture
Consequences of Bone loss in Fully Edentulous Patients
- Forward movement of prosthesis due to anatomical inclination
- angulation of mandible w/moderate to advanced bone loss
- Thin mucosa, w/sensitivity to abrasion
- Lose
- basal bone
- anterior ridge & nasal spine:
- causes increased denture movement & sore spots
- Parasthesia from mandibular neuromuscular canal
- More active role of tongue in mastication
- esthetic appearance of lower ⅓ of face
- Increased risk of mandibular body fracture
Soft Tissue consequences of edentulism
- Lose attached, keratinized gingiva as bone is lost
- Unattached mucosa for denture support→ sore spots
- Tissue thickness decreases w/age
- systemic diseases causes more sore spots for dentures
- Tongue:
- Increases in size→ decreases denture stability
- more active role in mastication→”. “
- Decreased neuromuscular control of jaw in elderly
Esthetic Consequences of Edentulism
- Decreased
- facial height
- horizontal labial angle of lip
- Increased:
- Columella philtrum angle
- maxillary lip length
- Loss of:
- labiodental angle
- muscle tone in facial expresión m.
- Thinning of:
- vermillion border of lips
- Deepening of:
- nasolabial groove
- vertical lines in lip and face
- Ptosis of:
- buccinator muscle attachment→jowls at side of face
- mentalis muscle attachment
- Chin rotates forward→ Prognathic appearance
Decreased performance of complete denture
- Decreased:
- Bite Force: 200-50 psi
- 15 years= 6 psi
- Masticator efficiency
- Life span
- healthy food intake
- limited food selection
- Bite Force: 200-50 psi
- More drugs to tx GI disorders
Decreased performance of removable partial dentures
- Low survival rate
- 4 years=60%
- 10 years=35%
- Abutment Teeth:
- repaire rate:
- 5 years= 60%
- 10 years= 80%
- Tooth Loss within 10 years= 44%
- Increased:
- mobility
- plaque
- BOP
- caries
- repaire rate:
- Increased Bone loss
Advantages of implant supported prostheses:
- Maintain:
- Bone
- Facial Esthetics (Muscle tone)
- Improve:
- esthetics (teeth positioned for appearance vs decreasing denture movement)
- Phonetics
- Occlusion
- oral proprioception (Occlusal awareness)
- masticatory performance
- stability & retention of removable prosthesis
- psych health
- Increase:
- prosthesis success
- survival time of prosthesis
- Decrease:
- size of prosthesis (eliminate palate, flanges)
- Restore &. maintain occlusal vertical dimension
- No altering adjacent teeth
- More permanent replacement
- Provide fixed vs removable prosthesis
Occlusal Force Distribution: Natural Teeth
Axial vs Lateral Forces
- Axial Forces
- Parallel to long axis
- forces distributed along entire root surface
- Lateral Forces (off axis)
- not parallel to long axis
- forces distributed to localized area
- (not entire root surface)
- Center of Rotation:
- ½ to ⅓ root length apical to alveolar crest
- Depends on alveolar bone height
- High cusps have higher torque than low cusps
Occlusal Force Distribution: Implants
- Any direction or magnitude (axial or lateral)
- forces/stress distributed at the crest of alveolar bone
- Crestal Stress→Bone remodeling
- avg annual bone loss= 0.1 mm
- Crestal bone around implants= Fulcrum point
- Crestal Stress→Bone remodeling
- Axial Force
- compressive forces on crestal bone
- if force is within physiologic limits→ no bone loss
- Non-Axial Force (lateral)
- Shear forces to bone→Bone Loss
- forces/stress distributed at the crest of alveolar bone
- Cusps:
- High cusps have higher torque than low cusps (Same as teeth)
- Large cusp angles→ ⇡ contact surface area→ Shear Forces
- A more Ideal Flat Cusp → concentrated forces over implant body → Reduce Shear Forces
- Occlusal Table
- Ideal Crown Contour= Diameter of implant body
- reduced cusp height
- Large Occlusal table→ Shear forces
- Adjustments:
- Maxillary Implant Contour
- Palatal contour reduction
- Mandibular
- Buccal Contour reduction
- Maxillary Implant Contour
- Ideal Crown Contour= Diameter of implant body
Occlusal Force Distribution: Factors affecting stress on implants
- Occlusal Contact Location
- Vertical height from the occlusal surface to the crest
- implant diameter
- Splinting of implant restorations
Implants: Occlusal Contact Location
- Over bulked/contoured implant crown create a cantilever
- overload force→ crestal bone loss or component failure
- buccolingual or mesiodistal dimension
Periodontal Sulcus vs Peri-implant sulcus
- Peri-implant sulcus
- weaker sulcular attachment→ ⇡Biological Width→ ⇡ PD (sulcular depths)
- Normal Physiologic PD > 4-5mm around implants
- weaker sulcular attachment→ ⇡Biological Width→ ⇡ PD (sulcular depths)
Periodontal Attachment vs Peri-implant attachment
- Teeth:
- gingival fibers:
- perpendicular to tooth long axis
- attach to tooth surface
- gingival fibers:
- Implants:
- Gingival fibers:
- parallel to implants long axis
- do not attach to implant surface
- Poor CT adhesion
- (vs natural teeth)
- Gingival fibers:
Implants: Inflammatory Response
- Bacteria/Plaque
- Greater inflammatory response
- more susceptible to tissue & bone loss
- Greater inflammatory response
Implants: Inflammatory Response
- Implants:
- Greater attachment breakdown with bacterial challenge
- Implant seal breaksdown→ ⇡Tissue loss (vs teeth)
- Greater inflammatory response to bacteria
- more susceptible to tissue & bone loss when challenged by plaque
- Greater attachment breakdown with bacterial challenge
Implants: Tissue Healing Response
- Slower healing due to decreased vascularity
- Unpredictable tissue regeneration
Tooth root vs Implant Body
- PDL= suspension system
- transfers occlusal loads to bone
- micro movements to dissipate overloads
- Implants:
- NO PDL
- occlusal loads transferred directly to bone
- Overload=Bone Loss
- Lateral Forces
- More technical complications
- screw loosening
- fracture
- Overload=Bone Loss