Final Flashcards
Sahelanthropus tchadensis
possible hominin or ape ancestor or both mixture of traits: -small brain -small teeth, canines -heavy brow ridge -elongated skull -large orbital torus
Orrorin tugenesis
small teeth with thick enamel
femora show evidence of bipedal locomotion but not conclusive
upper limb evidence of climbing adaptation
could be prior to pan/hominin split
Ardipithecus ramidus
4.4 to 5.8 MYBP
woodland habitat
anterior position of foramen magnum = upright posture and likely bipedalism
molars intermediate between chimp and australopithecine
larger canines than australopithecines, broader than in chimps
Suspensory locomotion - common ancestral condition?
evidence:
- more horizontal ilia, cup-like pelvis
- open mobile lumbar spine
- more vertical posture, but
- short legs, short arms
Australopithecines
bipedal apes with large thick enamel teeth, reduced canines, ape-size brains, high sexual dimorphism, savannah or open woodlands, mostly vegetarian diet
Australopithecine Body
compromise of locomotor adaptations 1. broad horizontal pelvis 2. extended "free" lumbar vertebrae but! 3. rib cage of a climber-brachiator 4. long curved fingers and slightly diverged big toe of a brachiator
Australopithecine: Small Stature
australopithecines were much smaller than modern humans
would make upright locomotion preferential for a suspensory adapted body frame (like gibbons)
ratio of weight to stature increases with size
Australopithecus africanus
3.6 MYA
6 lumbar vertebrae (one more than humans, 3 more than chimps)
further evidence against knuckle-walking ancestry
also bipedally adapted pelvis and femur
Australopithecine Teeth
reduction of canines and diastema
regressive in all australopithecines
greatest in early species, most reduced in later robust species
Australopithecus anamensis
3.9 to 4.2 MYA
obligate biped
20% larger than A. africanus, sexually dimorphic
larger molars than Ardipithecus, thicker enamel
large elongated canines
Australopithecus afarensis
2.9 to 3.6 MYA
clear bipedal adaptations: knee angle, wide bowl-shaped pelvis
massive face, jaw, molars
canines still protrude beyond tooth row and slight diastema
significant sexual dimorphism
Australopithecus robustus
1 to 2 MYA
large zygomatic arch and sagittal crest
maybe from africanus?
Australopithecus aethiopicus
2.5 MYA
small brain, posterior foramen magnum, massive sagittal keel, and wide zygomatic arch
Australopithecus boisei
1.2 to 2.3 MYA massive molars with extensive wear reduced canines and incisors sagittal crest broad zygomatic arch gorilla size brain likely lived at the same time (1.2 MYA) as some Homo species
Australopithecus sediba
many intermediate features
long thumb, shorter stubby fingers
shape of the pelvis is not as wide as other australopithecines (center) and more like later Homo
Australopithecus garhi
2.5 MYA
large molars and incisors, sagittal crest
femur elongation
evidence of stone tool use:
-broken and scratched bovid and horse bones
-show regular parallel linear scratches
-Oldowan type stone chips found at site
Oldowan Tools
Gona, Ethiopia 2.4 MYA
used by A. garhi, H. habilis, H. rudolfensis, early H. erectus/ergaster
appear to have been made “as needed” at butchery sites
more evidence of scavenging than hunting
Australopithecine vs. Homo adaptations
Australopithecine - bipedal with some suspensory adaptations, grassland habitat, large molars, reduced canines, ape-size brain, high sexual dimorphism
Hominine - fully bipedal, no suspensory adaptation, diverse habitats, small jaw and molars, canines, stay small, enlarged brain, low sexual dimorphism
Homo habilis
1.8 MYA
small molars, thin enamel, reduced incisor
reduced face, rounded cranium, 550 cc brain
reduced sexual dimorphism
Oldowan tools
Homo ergaster
1.75 MYA
small molars, thin enamel, reduced incisors
reduced face, rounded cranium, and 850 cc brain
reduced sexual dimorphism
extensive Oldowan tools
Homo rudolfensis
1.8 MYA
large brain (775 cc)
rounded vaulted cranium
heavy flat face
large incisors and canines compared to molars
first species with a brain size larger than other apes
Australopithecus face; Homo brain
Homo naledi
currently classified as a transitional species because that is the most parsimonious
strange (cave) location in which it was found
some evidence to suggest a much longer persistence of australopithecines
Homo ergaster
1.75 MYA
larger brain (850 cc), rounded cranium
reduced face and zygomatic arch
reduced molars, thin enamel, small canines compared to incisors
extensive Oldowan usage
robust but otherwise modern post-cranial skeleton, but smaller brain/long robust skull
coexisted with A. boisei for a while (did they hunt boisei?)
Transition to Homo ergaster
marked by an increase in both body size and brain size over any australopithecines
all correlates of arboreal adaptations vanish
loss of sexual dimorphism
Acheulean tool technology
first appear in Africa between 1.5 and 1.2 MYA
sharp bifaced tools with complex shaped edges, made from carefully selected stone materials
some of the sharpest are made from volcanic glass
rare in Asia
The Mind of Homo Erectus
brain size (900-1200cc) is in the low modern range (1000-2000cc)
sexual dimorphism similar to modern humans
highly mobile societies
stable foraging adaptation
adaptation to diverse ecosystems
no external symbols (artwork)
Homo heidelbergensis
700,000 years ago modern brain size (1500-2000 cc) elongated cranium robust face, with large orbital torus prognathic, high forehead
Homo neanderthalensis
confined to Europe and Middle East, including Iraq and Israel
from 120,000 to 30,000 years ago
brain size above the modern average size
less prognathous robust face, orbital torus, large nose, extensive turbinates
exhibit many distinctive skeletal features shared with earlier homo species but not modern ones
extinction likely caused by low temperatures
Mousterian technology
multiple stage tool manufacture with preparation of cores to better produce shaped flakes with broad continuous edges
=complex planning and visualization of an indirect consequence
specialized points; possible hafting
Neanderthal DNA
possible to do genetic testing because not always fully fossilized (this is not true of any other ancestor)
likely interbred with eurasians
some likely had fair skin and red hair, some had brown eyes and brown hair
deliberate Neanderthal burial sites have been found; evidence shows they cared for the infirm and elderly
may have had complex cultural traditions and beliefs
Tracing Y chromosome “Adam”
long arm of the Y chromosome does not recombine in sexual reproduction
inherited intact from father to son
therefore transmitted in an all or none fashion and so can be precisely traced from individual to individual without loss
“rooted” in Africa because the greatest genetic differences between individuals are found in Africa
Low Genetic Variation
suggests a recent common origin from a small population
all modern humans show less gene diversity than small populations of nonspecific apes
even Neanderthals are closer to humans than different chimp populations are to one another
genetic evidence: all modern human populations and “races” diverged from a common African population as recently as 70,000 years ago
Body Lice
diversification suggests that migration out of Africa may have involved the first continuous use of clothing
body lice live and reproduce in clothing and only contact skin to feed, large recent clade suggests that humans began to wear clothing 72,000 years ago
Flynn Effect
mean IQ has been steadily increasing in industrialized countries (even when corrected for culture- and generation-specific content)
IQ has high heritability