Fieldwork Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was the aim of the investigation of the river tillingbourne?

A

To investigate how the river tillingbourne changes downstream

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was our hypothesis with the physical enquiry?

A

Velocity, channel width and channel depth will all increase downstream

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was our sampling method in the physical geography enquiry?

A

Systematic across the river channels
5 sample points per transect
Stratified site to sample characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is our primary data with the river tillingbourne?

A

Velocity
Width + depth
Field sketch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why did we choose the location we did with the river tillingbourne?

A

Could examine human activity impacts
Close to school - easy to return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were our locations at the river tillingbourne?

A

Tributary of river Wey, source leith hill
Crossways farm
Abinger hammer
Gomshall (secondary data only)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was our secondary data with the river tillingbourne?

A

Land use survey
Os map
FSC data
Environment agency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was our theory with the river tillingbourne?

A

Bradshaws model
Changes in river characteristics from source to mouth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was our theory with the river tillingbourne?

A

Bradshaws model
Changes in river characteristics from source to mouth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was our risk assessment with the river tillingbourne?

A

Weather
Slipping
Weils disease
Drowning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How are we going to present our river data?

A

Cross section for width and depth
Bar graph for velocity
Annotated photo
Scatter graph for mean width/distance from source

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was our conclusion and evaluation for the river tillingbourne?

A

Bradshaws model is not perfect due to human influence at abinger hammer and crossways
We should increase sample points
Anomalous points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is our title for our human fieldwork?

A

How does quality of life vary in Reigate?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was our theory for human fieldwork?

A

Quality of life
Cycle of poverty
Index of multiple deprivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is our risk assemsent for Reigate?

A

Traffic
Strangers
Getting lost weather

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was our location of our familiar fieldwork?

A

Reigate, Surrey
South East of England
25 miles from London

17
Q

What was our sampling of Reigate?

A

Stratified
Systematic
Random

18
Q

What was our primary data for Reigate?

A

Environmental quality survey (EQS)
Car survey
Photographs
Place check
Epitome words
Soundscapes

19
Q

What was our secondary data for Reigate?

A

Census data
Index of multiple deprivation
House price data
Newspapers

20
Q

What was our data presentation for Reigate?

A

Multiple bar graph (EQS)
Annotated photographs
ArcGIS - proportional symbols

21
Q

Why did we choose Reigate?

A

Local to school
Can easily return to repeat measurements
Low ris
A range of urban land uses within a small area
Population size

22
Q

How did we sample a street?

A

Systematic

23
Q

What was our conclusion for Reigate?

A

Quality of life improves from south to north (environment and socio-economic)
Quality of life relatively improves with height

24
Q

How reliable is our conclusion for Reigate?

A

Methods support conclusions to some extent - we had good spatial coverage
Results could be supported by secondary data
Should be done at separate times of year
Opinion based scale is relatively small
Certain streets were not reperesented

25
Q

How could we improve our data analysis with Reigate?

A

Should be supported with the census and index of multiple deprivation
Return at a different time of day and year