Federal Civil Procedure Flashcards
Pullman abstention
Resolution of a state law court would eliminate need to decide federal constitutional issue
Burford abstention
Avoid interference with complex state regulatory scheme or matter of great importance to state
Younger abstention
Avoid enjoining criminal activity or akin proceedings
Colorado River abstention
Abstain to encourage unitary adjudication of issues
well-pleaded complaint rule
FQ JX on face of complaint, not anticipated defenses
exceptions to diversity jurisdiction
- probate and domestic relations
- interpleader (only 2 claimants need be adverse)
- CAFA
- Multiparty, Multiforum Trial Jurisdiction Act
Jurisdiction under Multiparty, Multiforum Trial Jurisdiction Act
Only one plaintiff need be diverse from one defendant if 75 victims from single accident at discrete location AND
- Defendant resides in a state different from where substantial part of accident occurred,
- two Ds in different states; OR
- accident took place in different states
When must a court abstain under MMTJA?
- Substantial majority of all plaintiffs are citizens of same state as primary defendants
- Claims are primarily state law of that state
Amount in controversy for diversity?
- exceeds 75k
2. good faith standard
When can plaintiffs aggregate claims for the amount in controversy requirement?
- if the plaintiffs are enforcing a single title or right in undivided interest
- If class actions (CAFA) or if representative plaintiff has enough and others come in through supp jx
When is a counterclaim compulsory?
Same transaction or occurrence
Does assignment of claims affect diversity?
Yes; assignee is now the determinative factor
Do substituted parties affect diversity?
Substitution due to death or incompetence does not affect diversity, but does when replacing the wrong party
Supplemental JX in diverse cases
- common nucleus of operative fact
2. Plaintiff cannot bring supplemental claim against non-defendants
When can a court decline supplemental jx?
- Novel or complex state law
- supplemental claims substantially predominate over claims within original federal JX
- OJX claims dismissed
- Exceptional circumstances
Specifc persons or claims for removal?
- Suits against US or officers
- Suits against federal employees for motor vehicle injuries
- any action where a party asserts a claim based off patents, plant variety protection, or copyrights
- international banking
Statutory prohibitions on removal?
- Federal Employers’ Liability Act and Jones Act (RRs)
- Carriers where amount does not exceed 10k
- Workers’ comp
- Violence Against Women Act
When must a notice of removal be filed?
30 days after service
What must a notice of removal contain?
- Rule 11 signature
- Filed in the district court and division where the state action is pending
- accompanied by process, pleadings, and orders sought to be removed
When must defendants consent to removal?
- When properly joined and served
2. If FQ, only if claim is asserted against them.
When must a party demand a jury after removal?
If not already demanded, 14 days after filing (D) or notice (P)
When can a party move to remand a removed action?
If SMJX, at any time.
If removal defect, within 30 days.
When are attorneys’ fees available for removal?
When removal was objectively unreasonable.
When is a remand order reviewable on appeal?
- Civil rights cases
2. class actions, if appealed not more than 10 days after remand order
When does the bulge provision apply?
- Third party defendants joined under Rule 14
2. Required parties under Rule 19
When can a court exercise jurisdiction over a non-US resident who has no contacts with any particular state?
- Claims based on federal law
- No state court can exercise pjx over D
- D has minimum contacts with US as a whole
Personal jurisdiction standard
- Minimum contacts
- Purposeful availment
- Fair play and substantial justice
When can a subsidiary create pjx over a parent?
Alter ego or agent
What are the pjx factors for fair play and substantial justice?
- Forum state interest
- Burden on D
- Interest of judicial system
- Shared interest of states in common social policies
Where is venue generally proper?
Any of:
- Where any defendant resides
- Where substantial part of events/property
- if none, then wherever a D is subject to pjx
Non-US residents can be sued in any judicial district
Where is venue proper against a federal official?
- D resides or substantial events
2. P resides, if no real property involved
Where is venue proper under the Federal Tort Claims Act?
Where the P resides or the place of the event
Where is venue proper against a foreign state?
Where substantial part of events occurred, or substantial property, or DDC
Where is venue proper under the Multiparty, Multiform Trial Jurisdiction Act?
where any D resides or where substantial part of accident took place
When is a 1404 transfer proper?
- Convenience of parties
- Interests of justice
If it’s improper (1404(b)), forum law does not transfer
When is a forum selection clause unenforceable?
Presumed valid. Can be set aside if:
- Unreasonable and unjust
- Invalid
forum non conveniens
Factor test:
- Availability of alternative forum
- Applicable law
- Location of parties, Ws, and evidence
Erie test
- Conflict between state and federal law?
- Valid federal statute or rule?
- If not, is state rule is outcome determinative?
- If so, are there countervailing federal interests requiring federal common law?
Are statute of limitations substantive or procedural?
Substantive
Is the burden of proof substantive or procedural?
Substantive
Who may effect service?
Anyone who is at least 18 years old.