Fed. Jurisdiction Flashcards
Subject matter jurisdiction is:
Power over the CASE.
Personal jurisdiction is:
Power over the PARTIES.
What are the two main types of suits that can be heard in federal court?
- Diversity of citizenship cases (complete diversity + more than $75k in controversy; or
- Federal questions
Complete diversity rule:
No diversity if ANY P is a citizen of the same state of ANY D.
Determining citizenship of a natural person: (2 factors)
- Presence in state, AND
- Intent to make it her permanent home.
May only be domiciled in one state at a time.
When is test for diversity applied?
When case is FILED.
Determining citizenship of corporation: (2 factors)
- Citizen of state where it was incorporated; AND
- Where the principal place of business is located.
(Corps can be citizens of two states at the same time.)
HYPO: XYZ Corp (inc. in MA w/ PPB in CA) sues D (CA). Is there diversity?
NO. Because both P and D are CA citizens.
Determining a corporation’s principle place of business (PPB):
Where managers:
- Direct,
- Coordinate, and
- Control corporate activities
(Usually the HQ)
Determining citizenship of unincorporated associations: (Partnerships, LLCs, etc.)
Use citizenship of ALL the members.
Determining citizenship for decedents, minors, and incompetents:
Use THEIR citizenship, not that of their agents.
Amount in controversy rule?
Must EXCEED $75k - not counting interest ON the claim or the costs of litigation.
Aggregation:
Adding two or more claims to meet the amount in controversy requirement.
HYPO: P sues D for $40k breach of K and $50k for another unrelated claim. The amount is $90k. Why is this permissive?
It’s the aggregate of the claims b/t one P and one D.
There is no limit to the number of claims that can be aggregated by one P against one D. The claims do not have to be related.
HYPO: P sues JOINT tortfeasors X, Y, and Z for $76k. Okay?
Yes. For JOINT CLAIMS uses TOTAL value of the claims - any one of the three could be liable for the whole amount.
Federal Questions case:
COMPLAINT must show a RIGHT or an INTEREST founded substantially on FEDERAL LAW. (Claim ‘arises under’ federal law.)
Equitable relief hypo: P sues D to tear down part of his house that blocks P’s view. What two tests?
Either:
- P view: Does the blocked view decrease the value of P’s property by more than $75k?
- D view: Would it cost D more thank $75k to comply with injunction?
Federal ct exclusions (not often tested)
Divorce, alimony, child custody, probate
What is a federal question case?
COMPLAINT must show a RIGHT OR INTEREST founded substantially on a federal law.
The claim “arises under” federal law.
What must be tested on EVERY SINGLE CLAIM?
Whether it meets either diversity or FQ.
Supplemental jurisdiction. What is it for?
Can be used to get additional CLAIMS into federal court that do not meet diversity or FQ.
Supplemental jurisdiction test: Claim must share:
COMMON NUCLEUS OF OPERATIVE FACT with claim that invoked federal subject matter jurisdiction.
Test is ALWAYS met by claims that arise from the same transaction or occurrence as the underlying claim.
Limitation of supplemental jurisdiction?
P cannot use supplemental jurisdiction to overcome a lack of diversity, but CAN be used to overcome the lack of amount in controversy.
Limitation also never applies in cases taken under the FQ rule.
Non-FQ, Non-diversity claims CAN BE heard on federal ct if it meets supplemental jurisdiction test, UNLESS the claim is: (3 factors)
- Asserted by P,
- against a citizen of the same state as the P.
- In a diversity of citizenship case (not FQ), and