FAR SEC 3 Flashcards
When the outcome of the contract is not reasonably measurable but the costs incurred in satisfying the performance obligation are expected to be recovered, how should revenue be recognized?
When the outcome of the contract is not reasonably measurable but the costs incurred in satisfying the performance obligation are expected to be recovered, revenue must be recognized only to the extent of the costs incurred. Revenue recognized is based on a zero profit margin until the entity can reasonably measure the outcome of the performance obligation.
Should earnings per share (EPS) be reported on the face of the income statement for cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle?
No.
Should earnings-per-share data be reported on the face of the income statement for income from continuing operations?
EPS data for income from continuing operations and net income must be reported on the face of the income statement. EPS data for a discontinued operation may be disclosed on the face of the income statement or in a note.
Should earnings-per-share data be reported on the face of the income statement for income from discontinued operations?
EPS data for a discontinued operation may be disclosed on the face of the income statement or in a note.
A company’s convertible debt securities are both a potential common stock and potentially dilutive in determining earnings per share. What would be the effect of these securities on the calculation of basic earnings per share (BEPS) and dilutive earnings per share (DEPS)?
Securities classified as potential common stock should be included in the computation of the number of common shares outstanding for DEPS if the effect of the inclusion is dilutive. Dilutive potential common stock decreases DEPS. BEPS is not affected by potential common stock.
Basic Earnings per Share (BEPS)
Basic EPS = (Net income - preferred dividends) ÷ weighted average of common shares outstanding during the period.
OR
BEPS = (Income Available to Common Shareholders)/(Weighted-average Number of Common Shares Outstanding)
Basic earnings per share does not factor in the dilutive effects of convertible securities.
Formula for Diluted Earnings per Share
The Formula for Diluted Earnings per Share
DEPS= (BEPS numerator + Effect of dilutive PCS)/(BEPS denominator + Effect of dilutive PCS)
What are the 4 criteria for considering that a contract exists from an accounting standpoint under ASC 606 Contracts with Customers?
A contract is accounted for under the revenue recognition standard if all the following criteria are met: (1) The contract was approved by both parties, (2) the contract has commercial substance, (3) each party’s rights regarding (a) goods or services to be transferred and (b) the payment terms can be identified, and (4) it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration to which it is entitled according to the contract.
When are share options antidilutive?
If the average price of the share options over the period is “out of the money”, the share options are antidilutive. Antidilutive shares cannot be added to the BEPS denominator as the Effect of PCS in the denominator for calculating DEPS.
The correction of an error in the financial statements of a prior period should be reported, net of applicable income taxes, in the current
Retained earnings statement as an adjustment of the opening balance.
Which of the following describes the appropriate reporting treatment for a change in accounting estimate?
All changes in accounting estimates are made prospectively. No changes are made in prior financial statements, and the beginning balances are not adjusted. The effects of all changes in accounting estimate are accounted for in the period of the change and future periods if the change affects both.
Under the guidance for recognition of revenue from contracts with customers (ASC 606), a contract modification is accounted for as a separate contract if the additional promised goods are _________(1) and the price for these additional goods is __________ (2).
A contract modification exists when the parties approve a change in the scope or price of a contract. A contract modification is accounted for as a separate contract if (1) it results in the addition to the contract of promised goods or services that are distinct and (2) the price for these additional goods or services is their standalone selling price.
Preferability Criterion - When to Change Accounting Principle?
If financial information is to be comparable and consistent, entities must not make voluntary changes in accounting principles unless they can be justified as preferable.
The three types of accounting changes are
A change in accounting principle,
A change in accounting estimate, and
A change in the reporting entity.
What are the three situations that fit the definition of a change in accounting principle?
A change in accounting principle occurs when an entity (1) adopts a generally accepted principle different from the one previously used, (2) changes the method of applying a generally accepted principle, or (3) changes to a generally accepted principle when the principle previously used is no longer generally accepted.
Is the initial adoption of an accounting principle the same as a change in principle?
No. A change in principle does not include the initial adoption of a principle because of an event or transaction occurring for the first time.
What is the temporal scope of changes in accounting principle?
Direct effects (including on income tax) are applied retrospectively, whereas indirect effects are recognized and reported in the period of change.
Retrospective application is required for all direct effects and the related income tax effects of a change in principle. An example of a direct effect is an adjustment of an inventory balance to implement a change in the method of measurement.
Retrospective application must not include indirect effects. These are changes in current or future cash flows from a change in principle applied retrospectively. An example of an indirect effect is a required profit-sharing payment based on a reported amount that was directly affected (e.g., revenue).
What are direct effects (from a change in accounting principle)?
Retrospective application is required for all direct effects and the related income tax effects of a change in principle.
An example of a direct effect is an adjustment of an inventory balance to implement a change in the method of measurement.
What are indirect effects (from a change in accounting principle)?
Retrospective application must not include indirect effects. These are changes in current or future cash flows from a change in principle applied retrospectively.
An example of an indirect effect is a required profit-sharing payment based on a reported amount that was directly affected (e.g., revenue).
Indirect effects are recognized and reported in the period of change.
How does retrospective application work for a change in accounting principle?
Retrospective application requires the carrying amounts of (1) assets, (2) liabilities, and (3) retained earnings (or other components of equity or net assets) at the beginning of the first period reported to be adjusted for the cumulative effect (CE) of the new principle on the prior periods.
All periods presented must be individually adjusted for the period-specific effects (PSE) of the new principle.
It may be impracticable to determine the CE of a new principle on any prior period.
The new principle then must be applied as if the change had been made prospectively at the earliest date practicable.
Impracticability Exceptions. It may be practicable to determine the CE of applying the new principle to all prior periods but not the PSE. In these circumstances, CE adjustments must be made to the beginning balances for the first period to which the new principle can be applied.
For retrospective application of a change in accounting principle, which balance sheet items are adjusted at the beginning of the first period reported for the cumulative effect (CE) of the change?
Retrospective application requires the carrying amounts of (1) assets, (2) liabilities, and (3) retained earnings (or other components of equity or net assets) at the beginning of the first period reported to be adjusted for the cumulative effect (CE) of the new principle on the prior periods.
For retrospective application of a change of accounting principle, what are the Impracticability Exceptions?
Normal Case is full Retrospective Application (Not Exception): Retrospective application requires the carrying amounts of (1) assets, (2) liabilities, and (3) retained earnings (or other components of equity or net assets) at the beginning of the first period reported to be adjusted for the cumulative effect (CE) of the new principle on the prior periods. All periods presented must be individually adjusted for the period-specific effects (PSE) of the new principle.
Exception (1): It may be impracticable to determine the CE of a new principle on any prior period. The new principle then must be applied as if the change had been made prospectively at the earliest date practicable.
Exception (2): It may be practicable to determine the CE of applying the new principle to all prior periods but not the PSE. In these circumstances, CE adjustments must be made to the beginning balances for the first period to which the new principle can be applied (meaning the first period when PSE can be stated???).
What is prospective adjustment?
Its effects must be accounted for only in (1) the period of change and (2) any future periods affected (prospectively). The prospective application must be applied from the beginning of the accounting period in which the accounting estimate was changed.
What is a Change in Accounting Estimate?
A change in accounting estimate results from new information. It is a reassessment of the future status, benefits, and obligations of assets and liabilities. Its effects must be accounted for only in (1) the period of change and (2) any future periods affected (prospectively).