Family Law Flashcards
Mohd Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum
- To the legal position flowing from Mohd Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, factum of divorce is not relevant and every Muslim woman was entitled to maintain a Section 125 CrPC petition
Mohd Abdul Samad v. The State of Telangana & Anr
Question raised- whether a divorced Muslim woman is entitled to file a petition for maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.
Karnataka Board of Wakf v. Govt. of India., (2004) 10 SCC 779
The Court recalled that the plea of adverse possession is a blend of fact and law.
The person who claims adverse possession must show the following:
“(a) on what date he came into possession; (b) what was the nature of his possession;
c) whether the factum of possession was known to the other party;
d) how long his possession has continued; and
e) his possession was open and undisturbed.”
Hemaji Waghaji Jat v. Bhikhabhai Khengarbhai Harijan., (2009
- The Court also stressed the importance of a limitation period while bringing an action to recover property in adverse possession.
- Referring to Saroop Singh v. Banto, it was stated that as per Article 65 of the Limitation Act, the starting point of limitation does not commence from the date when the right of ownership arises to the plaintiff but commences from the date the defendant’s possession becomes adverse
Need for limitation laws
- The necessity for enacting periods of limitation is to ensure that actions are commenced within a particular period, firstly to assure the availability of evidence documentary as well as oral to enable the defendant to contest the claim against him;
- secondly to give effect to the principle that law does not assist a person who is inactive and sleeps over his rights by allowing them when challenged or disputed to remain dormant without asseting them in a court of law.
- The principle which forms the basis of this rule is expressed in the maximum vigilantibus, non dermientibus, jura subveniunt (the laws give help to those who are watchful and not to those who sleep)
VASANTHA (DEAD) THR. LR v. RAJALAKSHMI @ RAJAM (DEAD) 2024
- Recently, the Supreme Court reiterated the well-established position of law that under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act of 1963, a suit for declaration of title without seeking recovery of possession is not maintainable when the plaintiff is not in possession
- This provision talks about the discretion of the Court for the declaration of status or right.
- However, it is imperative to note that its proviso states: “Provided that no Court shall make any such declaration where the plaintiff, being able to seek further relief than a mere declaration of title, omits to do so.
- Thus, the proviso restricts the application of such discretion, which is not to be exercised when the complainant seeks only a declaration of title while further relief can be sought.
- In Ram Saran v. Ganga Devi [(1973) 2 SCC 60], the Court had held that the suit seeking for declaration of title of ownership but where possession is not sought, is hit by the proviso of Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and, thus, not maintainable
DJS 2019 Hindu Law Ques. 30m.
What is the status of a Hindu’s 2nd marriage when the first is perfectly legal? Also the status of two daughters born out of both the marriages. What will the status if a decree of nullity is brought about for the first marriage. Also, what is the status of both the daughters after decree of nullity is obtained?
S. 5(i) of HMA explained
- Section 5(i) states that neither party should have a spouse living at the time of marriage.
- In case, there is a violation of this condition, the marriage is void in terms of Section 11 of HMA, 1955
Short note on Mahr. 2019 DJS
- Mahr, also known as Maher or Mehrieh, is a fundamental concept in Islamic marriage contracts.
- It refers to the obligatory payment or gift from the groom to the bride, which is specified and agreed upon during the marriage contract negotiations.
- Mahr serves multiple purposes within Islamic tradition:Symbolic Gesture: Mahr symbolizes the groom’s commitment to provide for his wife and demonstrates his responsibility towards her.Financial Security: It provides financial security to the bride, serving as a form of insurance or safeguard in case of divorce or widowhood.Respect and Honor: Offering Mahr is considered a gesture of respect and honor towards the bride and her family.Legal Requirement: Mahr is a mandatory component of an Islamic marriage contract, and its amount is agreed upon by both parties before the marriage is solemnized.
Short note on Talaq -ul- biddat. 2019 DJS
- Talaq ul biddat, also known as “triple talaq” or “instant divorce,” is a controversial Islamic practice whereby a husband can unilaterally and instantly divorce his wife by pronouncing the word “talaq” (divorce) three times in a single sitting.
- This practice has been widely criticized due to its potential for abuse and the lack of consideration for the well-being of the wife.
- In August 2017, the Supreme Court of India, in a landmark judgment, declared the practice of triple talaq unconstitutional, illegal, and void.
- The court held that triple talaq violated the fundamental rights of Muslim women guaranteed under the Indian Constitution, including the right to equality and non-discrimination.
- Following the Supreme Court’s ruling, the Indian government introduced the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, which criminalizes the practice of triple talaq.
- Under this law, pronouncing triple talaq is a cognizable offense punishable by imprisonment for up to three years.
Short note on Wasiyat. 2019 DJS.
- Intro of will
- Specific Intro for muslim law
Short note on Hiba. 2019 DJS.
- In Islamic law, gifts are known as ‘Hiba’.
- It is an unconditional transfer of ownership in an existing property, made immediately without any consideration.
- A Muslim is allowed to give away his entire property during his lifetime by gift, but only one-third of the total property can be bequeathed by will.
- A gift, being a transfer of property is governed by the ‘Transfer of Property Act, 1882’ but chapter VII of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 regulating the gifts does not apply to the ‘Muslim Gifts’.
Short note on Wakf. 2019 DJS
Formalities/ ceremonies of a valid ‘nikah’. 2019 DJS.
Short note on ‘Muttawalli’. 2019 DJS.
- In Muslim law, a mutawalli is a person entrusted with the administration and management of a waqf (charitable endowment).
- They are responsible for managing the assets and ensuring that the proceeds are used for the purposes specified in the waqf deed.
- As for landmark Supreme Court cases related to mutawalli and waqf management, one notable case is the “Maulvi Hussain Haji Abdul Ali vs. State of Gujarat” case in 1962.
- In this case, the Supreme Court of India clarified the legal principles governing the administration of waqf properties and the powers and duties of mutawallis.
The case provided important guidance on the responsibilities of mutawallis and the protection of waqf assets.
Discuss in brief maintenance ‘Pedente Lite’ and permanent maintenance and their objects under the HMA, 1955. 2019 DJS.
Maintenance ‘Pedente Lite’ under HMA.
- The fundamental objective of providing interim maintenance under Section 24 of HMA, 1955 is that either spouse, who does not have an independent source of income
and is unable to maintain himself or herself, is granted interim maintenance so as to not only be able to sustain himself or herself but also be able to pursue the litigation effectively
undertaken under HMA, 1955.
Object of maintenance ‘pedente lite’ under HMA.
Permanent maintenance under HMA.
1.
Discuss rights of a Hindu Female to take a son in adoption under HAMA. 2019 DJS
Can a female take two sons in adoption under HAMA? DJS 2019.
What is the effect of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) act, 2005 on the rights of Hindu women? DJS 2019.
Two basic beliefs of Muslims
- Two basic beliefs of Muslims are the existence and oneness of God,
- and the belief in the truth of Prophet Mohammed’s mission.
- Muslims also believe that the Quran is the only revealed book of Allah,
- and that there is a day of judgment (Qayamat), followed by life after death (Akhirat )
Hijirat
“Hijirat’, in fact, denotes the advent of a new Muslim era, as from here, from being a preacher, the Prophet also became the ruler of the state, which grew to be the empire of Arabia in ten years”
Shia-Sunni divide and ‘Muharram’.
- After Prophet Mohammad, one group favoured the nomination of Ali as the rightful successor, while the other advocated for a leader chosen by an election.
- The former group, which supported the nomination of Ali, was called the Shias and those who favoured an election were called the Sunnis.
- In fact, the Sunnis held the elections, and Abu Bakr, the father-in-law of the Prophet, was elected as the first Caliph (Khalifa).
- The Shias maintained all along, that the Caliphate was hereditary and was rightfully vested in Ali, and the direct male line of the Prophet by divine will. Therefore, they regard the first three Caliphs as usurpers.
- The Sunnis however, claimed that ascendancy to the throne depended upon the sanctity of the faithful, as decided by their votes, expressed through an election.
- “The rift between the Shias and the Sunnis became very wide and rather irreparable, and this incident is remembered with solemn grief by the Shias, as ‘Muharram’.”
Sources of Muslim Law
- The primary sources of Muslim law are the Quran, the Sunnat (traditions of the Prophet), the Ijma and the Qiyas.
- Other sources of relevance are the legislations, judicial decisions and customs.
3.
Quran as a source of Muslim Law
- The Quran is not a book of law, but it is concerned with the conduct of life.
- It distinguishes truth from falsehood and right from wrong. It is divided into ‘Sura’ or Chapters,
- It also contains provisions for safeguarding the interests of minors and the disabled, for raising the general status of women and for settling questions of inheritance and succession, on equitable grounds.
- Women were granted inheritance rights and were considered independent individuals, capable of holding property and disposing it of as full owners.
- “As it is divine in character, it cannot be altered, amended or modified by any human agency, or even by an institution. 5
‘Sunnat’ as a source of Muslim Law’
- The Sunnat, as also the traditions of the Prophet, are the primary source of Muslim law, second in point of time and authority, to the Quran.
- ‘Sunna’ means the model behaviour of the Prophet, and the narration of what the Prophet **said, did or allowed tacitly, is called ‘Hadis’ or traditions. **
- As the Prophet was the religious and later, the political leader as well, people came to him with their questions and problems and looked up to him to get his opinion.
- The Prophet sometimes, gave his own opinion, and sometimes, he gave it after consultations with his companions, but his verdicts were inspired by divine authority.
- All that he enjoined by words, were collectively, called the ‘Sunnat-ul-qaul’.
- He himself was a role model, and whatever he did, became an example for others to follow. This was called ‘Sunnat-ul-fail’, i.e., ‘what he did himself”
Ijma as a source of Muslim Law.
- The third source of law, both in point of time and in importance, is the Ijma.
- This term denotes the consensus of opinion of the companions of the Prophet, or even of highly qualified legal scholars.
- Law is primarily used for the betterment of the society, and hence, as the society can never be static, law also has to respond to the changing needs of the society.
- New problems and new questions emerge and throw new challenges before the judicial authorities, and therefore, the Ijma assumes an importance of its own.
- The binding authority of validity of the Ijma is traced to a verse in Quran ‘the way is by counsel in their affairs.”
- “Where the Quran and Hadis were silent on an individual problem, the legal scholars of great learning, called ‘Mujtahids’, were enjoined to deduce a valid conclusion from the Quran and the Sunnat.
- This was differentiated from a free opinion or advice and was called ‘Ijtihad”
Qiyas as a source of Muslim Law
- Qiyas means reasoning by analogy or analogical deductions from the above three sources of law, with the exercise of reason.
- It applies in cases where although one particular factual situation is not covered by the language used in the primary sources, it is nevertheless covered by applying the rule of reason.
- It does not lay down a proposition of law and is more in the nature of an application of law, as it is contained or obtained from the above three sources.
- The Qiyas is not universally recognised as a source of law. Shias do not accept it”
“Customs as source of Muslim law “
- The Pre-islamic customs and traditions, which were not expressly repealed by the Quran and Hadis, and were also not contradictory to it, along with the Quran, Hadis and Ijma, collectively form the source of Muslim Law.
- In order to bring about a uniformity these customs were abrogated, in all personal matters, they were made subject to Muslim law, and the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat Application) Act, 1937, was passed.
Division between Sheas and Sunnis
- Muslims are divided into two sects—Sunnis and Shias. This division was political in origin, as it centered around the question of who the successor of Prophet should be and the method of his appointment.
- Later on, jurisprudential differences also surfaced”
Maxim for need of limitation law
Maximum vigilantibus non dormientibus, Jura subvenient
Sunni Schools of Law
The Sunnis are further divided into four sub-schools, and the Shias are divided into three sub- schools. Both of them have their own books and authorities”.
Sunni Schools -
1. Hanafi School
2. Maliki School.
3. Shafei School
4. Hanbali School.
Hanafi School
- The Hanafi school was founded by Abu Hanifa, the great Imam, in his native city Kufa, in 8th century AD, and is also called the Kufa school.
- This system of law is called Hanafi law and was favoured by the Abbasid Caliphs.
- In India, a sizeable population of Sunni Muslims is that of Hanafis and often, Sunni law is referred to as Hanafi law.”
- “The well-known legal textbook of this school is Hedaya, while other important works are Durr-ul-Mukhtar, Radd-ul-Mukhtar and Al-Mukhtasar.
- In addition to it, in the 17th century, the Fatwa-I-Alamgiri, compiled at the command of the Mughal emperor, Aurangzeb, also includes the Hanafi doctrines”.
Maliki School
- Maliki school was founded in 8th century AD, at Medina in Saudi Arabia, by Malik ibn Anas.
- He expounded the traditions and perfected the doctrine of judicial practice of Medina.
- He followed the traditions of only the Prophet and in case of any conflicts in these traditions, relied on the Ijma of the Mujtahids of Medina.
- The doctrines of the Maliki school are contained in the Kitab-ul- Muwatta.
- Followers of the Maliki school are found in Spain, Morocco and North and East Africa.”
Shafei School
- Shafei school was founded by Muhammad ibn Idris ash Shafei, in the early 9th century.
- A pupil of Malik ibn Anas, he was the founder of the doctrine of Qiyas and established Ijma as a source of law.
- The important books of this school are the Minhaj-al-Talibin and the commentaries on it, viz., Nihajat-al-Muhtaj and Tuhfat-al-Muhtaj.
- In India, Sunni Muslims of the Southern region, adhere to the Shafei school”
Hanbali School.
- Founded in the 9th century by Ahmad ibn Hanbal at Baghdad, Iraq, this school relied on the traditions and perfected the doctrine of ‘usul’.
- Ahmad ibn Hanbal, who was a pupil of Imam Shafei, is said to have collected over 80,000 Hadis in ‘Musnad al Imam Hanbal’.
- The followers of this school are found in Central Arabia and in a few places in Syria and Central Asia.
- The authoritative books of this school are the Taat-ur-Rasul and the Kitab-ul-Alal.
“Shias are divided into three schools?
“Shias are divided into three schools:
”
1.Zaidya school
2. Ismailya school
3. Ithna Asharis
Zaidya School
- The followers of the Zaidya school recognise Zaid as their fifth Imam”
- They follow the principles of elective and not nominated Imamate, but the Imam must come from the family of the Prophet.
- Zaidy Imams are the rulers of northern Yemen in south Arabia.
- India does not have followers of this school.”
Ismailya School
S. 197 CrPC Intro.
- Section 197 Cr.P.C. has been enacted for affording some protection to “public servants” including Judges and Magistrates.
- In the case of Judges and Magistrates, they have to function without any fear or favour, affection or ill will.
- As long as they act bona fide, they need protection for fearlessly administering justice and any person dissatisfied with their verdicts cannot straightaway prosecute them for the judgment which may not be either palatable or to their liking.
- Similarly, a “public servant” may have several enemies many of whom will be those disgruntled elements who were not able to get official favours from the “public servants”
- Such disgruntled elements may be waiting for an opportunity to launch frivolous or vexatious prosecutions against such unobliging “public servants”.
- That explains the protection under Section 197 Cr.P.C. afforded to “public servants” who are amenable to Government control.
- Case Laws to follow - Bhagwan Prasad Shrivastava v NP Mishra.
- PIL v UOI.
- Chaudhary Parveen Sultan v State of WB (2009).
Afzalur Rahman v. King Emperor, AIR 1943
The object of prosecution sanction under S. 197 CrPC is to save ‘public servants’ from firvolous and vexatious prosecution.
Bhagwan Prasad Shrivastava v NP Mishra. 1970
- The object and purpose underlying this Section is to afford protection to public servants against “frivolous”, “vexatious” or “false” prosecution for offences alleged to have been committed by them while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of their official duty.
- The larger interest of efficiency of State administration demands that public servants should be free to perform their official duty fearlessly and undeterred by apprehension of their possible prosecution at the instance of private parties to whom annoyance or injury may have been caused by their legitimate acts done in the discharge of their official duty.
Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India 2005
- However, if the authority vested in a public servant is misused for doing things which are not otherwise permitted under the law, such acts cannot claim the protection of Section 197 Cr.P.C.
- and have to be considered dehors the duties which a public servant is required to perform.
- Hence, in respect of prosecution for such excesses or misuse of authority, no protection can be demanded by the public servant concerned. (Vide Chaudhury Parveen Sultana v. State of W. B. (2009)
The effect of absence of a “prosecution sanction” or an invalid “prosecution sanction”
A trial without a valid sanction where one is necessary is a ‘trial without jurisdiction’ rendering the proceedings void ab initio. (R. Chari v State of UP).
The inevitable requirements for sanction to prosecute an accused who is a judge, magistrate or a Public Servant.
- It is not enough that the judge, magistrate or ‘public servant’ concerned is holding such post.
- It should be further shown that they are not removable from their office except by or with the sanction of the appropriate government and that the alleged offence was committed by them while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of their official duties during the time when they were employed in connection with the affairs of the appropriate government.
3.
The necessity, if any, for prosecution sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. in the case of a public servant who has ceased to hold office or has retired from service
In the case of a public servant who has either ceased to hold office or has retired from service also, sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. to prosecute him for an offence which attracts the said Section, is a must. This is because of the employment of the words “who was at the time of commission of the alleged offence, employed”
Nirendra Natha Sarkar v State of Assam.
If, as per the Rules or Regulations governing the Government servant, a lower officer of the Government has been invested with the power to appoint or dismiss such Government servant, then it cannot be said that such Government Servant is removable by or with the sanction of the Government so as to necessitate a prosecution sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C
The meaning of the words “acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty” occurring in Section 197(1) Cr.P.C.
- The Section is not restricted only to cases of anything purported to be done in good faith, for a person who ostensibly acts in execution of his duty still purports so to act, although he may have a dishonest intention.
- Nor is it confined to cases where the act which constitutes the offence, is the official duty of the public servant concerned.
- Such an interpretation would involve a contradiction in terms, because an offence can never be part of an official duty.
- The offence should have been committed when an act is done in the execution of duty or when an act purports to be done in execution of duty.
- The test appears to be not that the offence is capable of being committed only by a public servant and not by anyone else, but that it is committed by a public servant in an act done or purporting to be done in the execution of duty.
- The essential requirement is a reasonable nexus between the alleged act and official duty and it does not matter if the act exceeds what is strictly necessary for discharge of the duty. (Vide – Abdul Wahab Ansri v.State of Bihar [2000]
Pukhraj v State of Rajasthan (1973)
- An ostensible act in purported exercise of official duty but done in bad faith is also covered by S. 197 CrPC.
- The true legal position is explained by Alagiri Swami J and H.R. Khanna J. in Pukhraj v State of RJ (1973) as follows -
- The section is not restricted only to cases of anything purported to be done in good faith, for a person who ostensibly acts in execution of his duty still purports so to act, although he may have a dishonest intention.
- Nor is it confined to cases where the act, which constitutes the offence, is the official duty of the official concerned.
- Such an interpretation would involve a contradiction in terms, because an offence can never be an official duty.
- The offence should have been committed when an act is done in the execution of duty or when an act purports to be done in execution of duty.
- The test appears to be not that the offence is capable of being committed only by a public servant and not by anyone else, but that it is committed by a public servant in an act done or purporting to be done in the execution of duty.
Can it be said that certain offences committed by public servants cannot constitute acts done in performance of official duty ?
- In State of H.P. v. M.P Gupta (2004). it was held by the Apex Court that it was no part of the official duty of a public servant to commit offences punishable under S. 467, 468 and s. 471 IPC and, therefore, there was no need for any sanction to prosecute such a public servant.
- In State of Kerala v Padmanabhan Nair (1999), it was held by the Apex Court that it was no part of the duty of a public servant while discharging official duties to enter into a ‘criminal conspiracy’ for committing criminal breach of trust and as such it cannot be said that sanction under S. 197 CrPC is a condition precedent for launching a prosecution for offences under S. 406, 409 read with S. 120B of IPC.
No prosecution sanction necessary in the case of certain erotic offences like rape etc.
“Public servants” who commit offences punishable under Sections 166 A, 166 B, 354, 354 A, 354 B, 354 C, 354 D, 370, 375, 376, 376 A, 376 C, 376 D or 509 of the Indian Penal Code are liable to be prosecuted for those offences without prosecution sanction under Section 197 (1) Cr.P.C. in the light of the Explanation to Section 197 (1) Cr.P.C. inserted by Amending Act 13 of 2013 with effect from 03-02-2013.
Kushal Versus State of Karnataka By Police Inspector Hubli, 2024.
- The Supreme Court observed that when the case of the prosecution is entirely based on the extra-judicial confession being circumstantial in nature then the accused cannot be convicted for the offence unless the chain of circumstances is completed by the prosecution.
- It may be noted that the entire case of the prosecution is based on circumstantial evidence. The principles concerning circumstantial evidence are fairly settled and are generally referred as the “Panchsheel” principles.
- Essentially, circumstantial evidence comes into picture when there is absence of direct evidence.
- For proving a case on the basis of circumstantial evidence, it must be established that the chain of circumstances is complete.
- It must also be established that the chain of circumstances is consistent with the only conclusion of guilt.
- The margin of error in a case based on circumstantial evidence is minimal.
- For, the chain of circumstantial evidence is essentially meant to enable the court in drawing an inference.
- The task of fixing criminal liability upon a person on the strength of an inference must be approached with abundant caution.”, the Judgment authored by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma observed.
- relying on the extra-judicial confession made by the accused to the PW 1 (an interested witness being a father of deceased child).
- The confessions, one made after a voluntary visit to the police station and the other made after arrest from the house, stand on materially different footings from the point of view of voluntariness. The likelihood of the latter being voluntary is fairly lesser in comparison to the former.
- Furthermore, the extent of acceptability of an extra-judicial confession depends on the trustworthiness of the witness before whom it is given and the circumstances in which it was given.
- The prosecution must establish that a confession was indeed made by the accused, that it was voluntary in nature and that the contents of the confession were true.
- The standard required for proving an extra-judicial confession to the satisfaction of the Court is on the higher side and these essential ingredients must be established beyond any reasonable doubt. The standard becomes even higher when the entire case of the prosecution necessarily rests on the extra-judicial confession
Panchsheel Principles for Circumstantial evidence.
It may be noted that the entire case of the prosecution is based on circumstantial evidence. The principles concerning circumstantial evidence are fairly settled and are generally referred as the “Panchsheel” principles.
3. Essentially, circumstantial evidence comes into picture when there is absence of direct evidence.
4. For proving a case on the basis of circumstantial evidence, it must be established that the chain of circumstances is complete.
5. It must also be established that the chain of circumstances is consistent with the only conclusion of guilt.
6. The margin of error in a case based on circumstantial evidence is minimal.
7. For, the chain of circumstantial evidence is essentially meant to enable the court in drawing an inference.
8. The task of fixing criminal liability upon a person on the strength of an inference must be approached with abundant caution.”, the Judgment authored by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma observed.
Kushal Versus State of Karnataka By Police Inspector Hubli, 2024. Extra Observation.
- It is also noteworthy that the purpose of criminal trial is not only to ensure that an innocent person is not punished, but it is also to ensure that the guilty does not escape unpunished.
- A judge owes this duty to the society and effective performance of this duty plays a crucial role in securing the faith of the common public in rule of law.
- Every case, wherein a guilty person goes unpunished due to any lacuna on the part of the investigating agency, prosecution or otherwise, shakes the conscience of the society at large and diminishes the value of the rule of law.
Amount of mahr
The amount of Mahr can vary widely based on cultural, economic, and personal factors. It can be anything of value agreed upon by the bride and groom, whether it be money, property, jewelry, or any other tangible asset. However, it is essential that the Mahr be reasonable and affordable for the groom to fulfill his obligation.
Overall, Mahr is not just a financial transaction but carries significant symbolic and cultural importance within Islamic marriages, emphasizing mutual respect, commitment, and financial protection for the bride.
Interim maintenance under CrPC
- the object of the provision for interim maintenance in the Cr.P.C., 1973 was to address the destitution and vagrancy
which becomes a precursor to the commission of offence. - It was intended to ensure that no one is driven to penury compelling them to commit crime for their survival.
- With this object, it was intended that at least some money must be given for sustenance and subsistence of the wife and the children.
Interim monetary relief under DVA
- The most unique feature of the DV Act, 2005 is that while the remedies were essentially civil in nature, but considering the
delays in civil adjudication, the procedures prescribed were of Cr.P.C., 1973. - Under the DV Act, 2005, the provision for
interim monetary relief was incorporated to provide the wife with immediate succour. - The monetary relief as provided under Section 20 of the DV Act, 2005 is far more expansive than the right of interim maintenance recognised under Section
125 of Cr.P.C., 1973. - The relief is not limited to maintenance
but also included expenses incurred and losses suffered by the aggrieved person and any child of the aggrieved person as a result of domestic violence inter alia loss of earnings, medical expenses, the loss caused due to the destruction, damage or removal of any property from the control of the aggrieved person, in addition to the maintenance for the aggrieved person as well as her children
Difference between maintenance provisions of HAMA and HMA
- In the case of Rajnesh vs. Neha, (2021) 2 SCC 324, the Supreme Court, while considering the aforementioned provisions and Acts, observed that the distinction between maintenance under HAMA, 1956 and HMA, 1955 is that the right under Section 18 of the HAMA is also available during the subsistence of a marriage, without any matrimonial proceeding pending
between the parties. - However, once the divorce is granted, the wife can seek permanent alimony only under Section 25 of HMA, 1955.
- Additionally, the relief of permanent alimony under Section 25 of HMA, 1955 is available to both spouses irrespective of their gender, however, only the wife can seek
maintenance from her husband under Section 18 of HAMA, 1956. - The Supreme Court in the case of Chand Dhawan vs. Jawaharlal Dhawan (1993) 3 SCC 406 discussed the interplay between the provisions of maintenance in HMA, 1955 and HAMA, 1956, It is only when the marital status is affected or disrupted by the Court under HMA, 1955 that the claim for permanent alimony can be made under Section 25 of HMA, 1955 and if there is no disruption of the status, then the wife has to necessarily claim maintenance under HAMA,
1956.
Rajnesh (supra)
To avoid conflicting orders and overcome this issue of overlapping jurisdiction, the Apex Court in Rajnesh (supra) laid down certain guidelines which are reproduced herein below: -
1. Where successive claims for maintenance are made by a party under different statutes, the court would consider an adjustment or set-off, of the amount awarded in the previous proceeding(s), while determining whether any further amount is to be awarded in the subsequent proceeding.
2. It is made mandatory for the applicant to disclose the previous proceeding and the orders passed therein, in the subsequent proceeding.
3. If the order passed in the previous proceeding(s) requires any modification or variation, it would be required to be done in the same proceeding
4. Hence, once an Order has been made by
one Court, the subsequent modification/variation of the said Order shall also
be pursued before the same Court.