Family Influences Flashcards

1
Q

secure attachment influences life

A
Positive peer relationships 
Emotion regulation
Social competence 
Executive functions
Empathy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

insecure attachment influences life

A

Higher risk of internalising problems

Elevated risk of externalising problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

secure attachment at age 12-18 months

A
  • superior problem-solving skills when faced with stress and challenges during the preschool years.
  • more persistent and resilient in these adverse circumstances
  • higher social competence and independence than insecure children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

influence of peers positive

A

It is found that children who enjoy good relationships with their peers are less likely to have adjustment problems later in life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

influence of peers negative

A

interacting with peers in middle childhood are more susceptible to later psychology disorders and academic problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

influence of peers general

A

the importance of peer relations should not be neglected, as they have considerable influences on the development of children’s sense of security, social sensitivity and feelings about the self (Rubin et al., 1998).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

meta-analysis on attachment for later problems

A

secure attachment predicts less externalizing problems (d=0.31) and internalizing problems (d=0.15) based on effect sizes of more than 6000 children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

connection early attachment later representations

A

Studies that demonstrate a connection between early overt attachment behaviors and later representations do not, however, investigate continuity in attachment behavior with later development models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

socialability attachment cross cultural

A

patterns of association between child-parent attachment quality and social competence appear to generalise cross-culturally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

relationship quality attachment and social competence. can be explained by

A

influence of attachment on ToM

infants have an enhanced ability to understand the mental states of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

other factors that influence child development

A

psychological well being of parents , psychological charactersitics of child, parenting style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

depression parent

A

interaction between the parent’s psychological state/depression, and the child-parent attachment relationship representation/insecure attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

depression parent

A

interaction between the parent’s psychological state/depression, and the child-parent attachment relationship representation/insecure attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

addiction parents influences

A

cognitive compentences which are independent of attachment §

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

parenting style

A

authoritative parents (as per Baumrind’s style of parenting) are more psychosocially competent than peers from authoritarian, permissive, or indifferent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

influence of context

A

Tamang Nepal Different cultural context

Temang, Nepal, caregivers displayed negligent parenting, but infants displayed secure attachment later.

Can be seen as a form of love, because parents are trying to build resilience in their children so that they can better deal with hardship, the child is able to integrate this into their internal working model

17
Q

context showing interaction between

A
  • temperament
  • parenting style
  • cultural context
  • resilience
18
Q

parenting styles cultural variation

A

Last 10 years:

Low income, african american parents : authoritarian not as negative as for other groups

So ideal parenting style does not work across all contexts

Ethic groups and SES need to be considered

What a culture believes is important in parenting –> mediates the behaviour because more normative / accepted eg smacking

19
Q

domain specific control

A

Don’t think of control as global ( as done in ideal parenting styles ) more effective to break it into compontents, maybe think of psychological control ( parents inducing guilt), behavioural control ( expectations and effective monitoring ) knowledge control ( do parents know what children do?)

20
Q

parenting style

A

Parenting style: overall emotional climate of parent child relationship

- Warmth, control
21
Q

parenting practice

A

Parenting practice

Monitoring a childs whereabouts –> same parenting practice may have different outcome acfording to parenting style

22
Q

concerns about alternative families

A

no father / mother figure –> gender identity problems
lesbian mothers –> children gay + no father figure
surrogate –> no genetic tie bad for psych adjustment

23
Q

why is it good to study reproductive donation families

A

consequences of non-biological relatedness without the negative factors experienced by adoptees and stepchildren –> thus show us about the importance of process

24
Q

Golombok 2013 longitudinal study children born through reproductive donations

method

A

30 surrogacy, 31 egg donation , 35 donor insemination, 53 natural conception

assessment age 3, 7, 10 - childs adjustment
parenting assessment age 3

25
Q

olombok 2013 longitudinal study children born through reproductive donations
results

A

reproductive donations: Strenghts and DIfficulties Questionaire normal results –> thus are not indicative of psychological disorders

surrrogacy children: hihger levels of adjustment difficulties age 7 ( age when children start to understand biological inheritance )

could be due to ( factors exclusive to surrogacy not gamete donation ) :
- surrogate mother may remain in contact which could undermine family relationships

stress of mothers have large effect if children know about their orrigin ( age 7 : 0.12 )

socio-economic status was only significant up toa ge 10

26
Q

olombok 2013 longitudinal study children born through reproductive donations problems

A

sample size not big small difference between family types could be undetected

sampling bias: most concernred about secrecy wont participate

childs difficulites underreported due to stereotype

27
Q

longitudinal study adopted children

A

significant higher problems than matched comparison group at age 7 but these reduce in adolescence
( maybe struggling earlier because earlier confrontation with identity issues )

28
Q

Divorced families Keith

A

evidence for the family conflict perspective

92 studies comparing children from divorced fams vs intact fams –> median effect size 0.14 ( but less if only using methodologically sound studies )

however, if comparing intact fam high conflict, intact fam low conflict and divorced fam

lowest scores of intact fam high conflict on psychological adjustment and self-esteem ( 0.12 standard deviation below divorce family and 0.32 below lowconflict intact

29
Q

Golombok 2014 adoptive gay parents

A

N=41 gay parents, 40 lesbian mothers, 49 heterosexual

Similarly, an investigation in the United Kingdom found no differences in the adjustment of children adopted by gay fathers, lesbian mothers, or heterosexual parents. Where differences in parenting were identified, these reflected more positive parenting by gay fathers than by lesbian mothers an

Less externalising problems for adopted children in gay families if positive parental well being ( particularly the stress index which predicted externalising problems beta =.58 , family type did not predict externalising problems , disciplinary aggression marginally predictive )

30
Q

another positive aspect of Golombok 2014

A

Overcame limitations of farr et al by having standardized interview and observational and questionnaire measures of parental well being