Family and Couples Therapy Flashcards
General characteristics of family and couples therapy
Problems are seen as lying in the interaction of individuals/families, rather than in the individuals
Often manifests as one person having a problem ‘the patient’
Therapists have to avoid making the same assumption that it is about the individual
Commonly delivered by a team (one observing and guiding the therapist in the room)
How distinct are the different approaches to family and couples therapy?
The models sometimes overlap (particularly structural and strategic)
Work of Haley started as strategic work and moved to being structural
Therapists who devise the therapies are people and can end up rowing about trivial things (the systemic group broke in two - there are a lot of therapies out there and some of them look very similar)
Where can family and couples therapy be applied?
Families
Couples
Therapeutic settings
Workplaces
Most common in family therapy where the child is the ‘patient’ and in marriage counselling
Strategic approaches
Derived from Bateson’s (1956) concepts of how family systems become problematic (particular focus on circularity)
Based on the assumption that family problems emerge when the family tries to solve issues, but the solutions are faulty - communication becomes contradictory (words and expression do not agree)
So the family solutions become factors that maintain or worsen difficulties
Role of therapist in strategic approaches
Strategic therapists do not join the family - more external and prescriptive
Adopts a position of being active and directive
Plan is to break up the pathological interaction patterns (symptom removal as the family will develop more adaptively once the symptoms are alleviated
Not cosmetic surface-level changes
Aim for more fundamental, rule-level changes
Strategies in strategic approaches
Commenting on how people in the system deal with each other so that patterns become overt (you all talk at once but do not listen)
Disrupting interactive sequences that can lead to conflict (one person talks at a time instead of all talking across each other)
Reorganise the system to function differently (the family must eat one meal a day together)
Breaking repetitive negative cycles (stop going out for a drink when frustrated with your partner)
Structural approaches
Based on the assumption that family problems emerge when boundaries between members and their roles are not clear or appropriate
What do you tend to see when boundaries between members of a family are not clear
Hierarchical problems (grandparents overrule parents; children expected to take on adult roles)
Cross-generational alliances (mother and grandmother act as parents, excluding the father)
Pathological patterns in structural approaches
Enmeshment
Disengagement
Enmeshment
Boundaries between family members are unclear/diffuse
Disengagement
Boundaries are too rigid
What are structural approaches based on?
Most developed from Minuchin’s (1978) work on psychosomatic families
- Family issues driving and maintaining the development of problems with a physical element (e.g. asthma, anorexia nervosa)
Pathology lies within the family, not the individual (family structure tends to react against any effort by the ‘patient’ to become less ill
Aims of structural approaches
To create change by ‘getting into’ the family system and interrupting patterns
‘Joining’ the family in therapy
Treatment aims of structural therapy
Achieve a pattern of clear, appropriately flexibly boundaries between the parental subsystem, the child subsystem, and the world
Helping families reorganise so that
- Parents are in charge
- Boundaries are clear and flexible
- There are healthy patterns of interaction
Allows for growth in the individual and development in relationships (children’s roles change as they mature)
Therapy techniques in structural approaches
Getting the family to enact their intentions, rather than just describing them, to highlight the way those interactions cause problems
Breaking up patterns of interaction by siding with one family member and developing their power within the family
Increasing stress within the family to unbalance the system
Manipulating mood states by acting out family mood displays
Labelling, exaggerating or prescribing symptoms (showing the family what they are doing)
Aims to allow slow changes, rather than sudden leaps (slower compared to strategic therapy)