Families- T4- Changing Family Patterns Flashcards
what do the marriage trends show?
1972- highest number of marriages since WW2
Average number of marriages have gone into decline
2004- 273,000
2005- 244,710
Why is marriage in decline?
Morgan 2003 notes marriage is under threat for a number of reasons:
- people marrying later
-changing attitude to marriage
- cohabitation, declining stigma to alternatives
- secularisation
- increase in single person households
- declining fertility and birth rates
- changes in the position of women
- Rising divorce rates
Changing social attitudes
- Wilkinson- women’s attitudes have radically changed due to priorities, education, feminism of the economy-> gender quake
Secularisation
Cohabitation
Individualism
- more opportunities Smith (2001)- marriage is unrealistic about monogamy
- at different stages of life people have different requirements and this may be needed from a new partner
However this does not reflect a decline in a commitment- civil partnerships have released
What is marriage like in different ethnicities?
Berthoud 2000
- % of Bangladeshi and paki-stani women getting married by age 25 -> 75%
-% of white women getting married by 25 -> just over 50%
British African Americans have the lowest rate of marriage- only 39% are married by ages 60 compared to 60% of white adults
Evaluation of marriage
Delaying not rejecting
- 1971= brides at 22, grooms at 25
- 2003= brides at 23, grooms at 31
Social attitudes
-People still as important
- children is best in marriage
- benefits of ‘freedom’ don’t outweigh marriage benefits
Remarriages
- show commitment to the institution of marriage
Married men and women is still the main type of partnership in the UK
- 7/10 families headed by married couples (2005)
What are cohabitation figures like?
The majority of cohabiting people are aged between 25 and 29
in 1950s number of couples cohabiting before first marriages was less than 2% but by 1996 risen to 77%
ONS-> fastest growing family type in the UK
69,000- same sex couples cohabiting
1/5th are serial cohabits
Reasons for cohabitation
in 1998 the British Household Panel (BHP) asked people why they choose to cohabit:
1- Majority: prelude marriage as supposed to replace it. a stepping stone to marriage
2- over half: saw it as a trial marriage- testing the relationship before making it legally binding
3- around 40% saw it as advantageous over marriage
4- some mentioned the absence of legal ties- more freedom to end the relationship
- decline in stigma attached to sex outside of marriage
- young are more likely to accept- Beijing 1985, equal relationships
- changing position of women- less need for financial security
-secularisation
What does the New Right think of cohabitation
Source of concern
Less stable than marriage: Morgan 2003=
- less happy
- more likely to suffer abuse
- stressed and depressed
Child from cohabiting couples suffer: Murphy 2007=
- poor school results
- leave education earlier
- higher risk of serious illness
What is living apart together
they are increasingly discussed as an alternative to marriage
these couples do not live together but maintain a sexual relationship and other than lack of co-resident act as partners
Duncan and Phillips 2009- difficult to define this lifestyle- how does it differ from dating
Smart 2011- opinions are divided as to whether this is a modern solution keeping some independence, matter of choice OR it arises out of necessity conditions of work
What are the types of marital breakdown?
Can take 3 forms:
Divorce
- legal ending of marriage
- divorce reform act 1969!!! -> ‘irretrievable breakdown’
- 1984-> divorce after one year
Separation
- couples agree with live apart after a breakdown of marriage
- More likely when divorce is harder to obtain
Empty shell marriages
- husbands and wife stay together in name only, no love or romance
- may persist due to children, but are likely to end in separation or divorce
Recent trends in divorce law
2004 Civil Partnership Act- legal dissolution of a civil partnership on same groups of marriage
2007- equality assumed in all divorces 50/50 split of all assets including salaries and pensions
2014- same sex marriages became law, same ground for divorce apply to both types of marriage
Why have divorce rates increased?
- Divorce laws
- Functionalists- higher divorce rates
- Feminists- women’s expectations
- Less Stigma and shame
- Close knit families also in decline
- Modernity and individualisation
BUT
- this does not mean to say people’s attitudes are casual to divorce -> it is still an emotional and traumatic event for a family
- it also has a severe impact on children
- Divorce Laws
Theyre easier
- however this may reflect our social attitudes to divorce (social expectations of marriage have changed)
- Functionalists
higher divorce rates indicate value of marraige and higher standards (fletcher)
- no longer prepared to put up with empty shell marriages
- may need multiple partners to achieve this
- romantic love- Mr/Mrs Right
- Feminists -> women’s expectations
- Thorne and Collard= women expect more out of marriage, if husbands fail to live up to it they may have to look elsewhere
- Sigle-Rushton= mothers who have a dual burden more likely to divorce
- Bernard= growing dissatisfaction with patriarchal marriage
- Hart= divorce may be a response to frustration of working wives a they feel they have the burden/ responsibility of housework and childcare or due to tension from women as breadwinner
Improved education and career opportunities-> women no longer need to be financially dependent on their husbands - welfare benefits
- Less stigma and shame
- socially acceptable ‘normalised’ - secularisation