False Memory Flashcards
What is False Memory?
Remembering something wrong or remembering something that never happened
Car Accident (Loftus, 1979)
View car accident slides with either a stop sign or a yield sign and asked which they saw
Consistent condition: 75% accurate
Inconsistent condition: 41% accurate
Vocab effects too (no broken glass in the slides):
Hit: 14% said they saw broken glass
Smashed: 32% said they saw broken glass
Physiological Response to False Memory (Baioui et al, 2012)
Used picture version of the DRM task
Found stronger physiological effects for true memories
IMPLIES: some unconscious awareness that the lure is false
Neural Mechanisms of False Memory (Cabeza et al, 2001)
Used fMRI
Hippocampus activity was greater for old words than new words BUT the same for old words and false items in the parahippocampul gyrus
IMPLIES: hippocampus involved in semantic memory, MTL involved in sensory memory
Rejection of Lures (Atkins & Reuter-Lorenz, 2011)
fMRI study of the DRM task
Found DLPFC activation was associated with the correct rejection of lures
Catholic and Jews (Pezdek, Finger & Hodge, 1997)
Asked Catholics and Jews about religious events Catholic p's: -7 false recall for Catholic event -1 false recall of Jewish event Jewish p's: -3 false recall of Jewish event -0 false recall of Catholic event IMPLIES: false memory needs some familiarity with the context of the memory
Eyewitness Testimony (Loftus, 1979)
Jurors were more likely to believe eyewitness testimony if it was delivered with high confidence
IMPLIES: eyewitness testimony should be obtained using mock witnesses
‘Gist’ (Brainerd & Reyna, 2005)
Gist and item-specific recollection exist parallel
Associative networks: seeing a particular words activates related words
Eyewitness Testimony (Sporer et al, 1995)
Weak correlation between confidence and eyewitness accuracy
Repeatedly telling a false memory creates misleading confidence through repeated recall
DRM paradigm (Roediger & McDermott, 1995)
Experiment 1:
examine a list of words all linked by a ‘critical lure’ e.g. chair
40% recalled seeing lure words (chair)
58% used the highest confidence rating of having seen chair - false memory not due to guessing
Experiment 2: R/K paradigm
If p’s recalled the lure word in the first experiment then they were more likely to say they ‘remembered’ the experience of seeing it: not just familiarity