factors which influence pol stability Flashcards
Personal style, rely on close group of people, mutual benefit-Indonesia
Suharto had cronies such as cukongs Liem Sioe Liang and Bob Hasan which provided capital and connections.
Personal style, rely on close group of people, mutual benefit-Philippines
Marcos’ cronies were given monopolies for political support. Robert Bendicto controlled the sugar industry and Antonio Floriendo controlled the bananas industry.
political style to reduce opposition- Indonesia
Suharto was distrustful of others and had a personal style of frequently rotating those around him to ensure no one gathered sufficient influence or leadership to challenge him. He also fostered relationships with individuals rather than groups, playing one off against the another through ‘one-on one’ consultations or better known as ‘Kiss’- ‘to the palace one by one’
political style to reduce opposition- Philippines
Marcos was ruthless and brutal when dealing with political enemies or opposition. He passed General Order No.2 which compelled the the military to arrest and detain a list of people including leading politicians and leaders of suspected subversive organisations. He also assassinated long-time political rival Benigno Aquino in 1983 and had confiscated all his economic assets.
leaders manipulate elections, constitutional processes- Philippines
The elite domination of constitutional processes and elections characterized Philippine politics. Elections never promoted popular participation or a clear mandate for a legitimate leadership. Marcos’ New Society Movement mobilized electoral support through vote buying and intimidation.
leaders manipulate elections, constitutional processes- Indonesia
While elections were held regularly and constitutional processes of Presidential nomination in the MPR ( People’s Consultative Assembly) were adhered too, Suharto was the only Presidential candidate throughout the New Order and elections heavily manipulated by ABRI and Golkar. Despite regular elections, political contestation was out of bounds since the opposition parties were amalgamated in 1972. Constant manipulation of constitutional processes led to domination of the regime for 30 years.
leaders skill- Thailand
Prem was a master strategist who was able to perceive shifting currents and changes in the balance of power even as the international and do,estic developments strengthened and weakened other groups. He could establidsh political stability as he was able to constantly reshuffle his cabinet and power bases to ensure accommodation among the diff groups (Young Turks, businesses, etc)
leaders skill- Singapore
Goh Chok Tong arrested the slide in PAP’s share of votes in the 1990s by introducing a more consultative style of politics to prevent PAP to being seen as increasingly distant from the public. He also initiated the broadening of political discourse bounded by OB markers. The opening up of politics under him was timely in helping the government reconnect with the grassroots.
Culture- Indonesia
Javanese culture was non-confrontational. Central to the New Order’s political culture were the Islamic concepts of musyawarah ( deliberation) and mufakat (consensus). These concepts undergirded the reluctance to acknowledge lines of division and conflict openly. As a result, even when military leaders were replaced by Suharto or when differences arose these diffetences were usually swept under the carpet. These led to the muted nature of opposition in Indonesian political culture up to the late 1980s.
Culture-Philippines
Culture of ‘utang na loob’ which essentially meant indebtedness. This resulted in the Phillipines having an accommodative patronage system which saw Marcos ‘buying’ loyalty from his cronies.
mil defiance led to collapse of regimes- Indonesia
The military refused to follow orders of Suharto. During the 1998 protest which eventually led to Suharto’s fall and the end of the New Order, when the students marched from Parliament to the Presidential Palace on 18 May, they were flanked by military officers from the Air Force, Navy and Marines, to protect them from government forces.
mil defiance led to collapse of regimes- Philippines
In the Philippines, during the 1986 EDSA/ People Power Revolution, the military refused to follow Marcos’ orders but instead supported the protestors. The RAM also attempted to stage a coup, but failed.
mil-bureaucratic domination-Indonesia
By the late 1970s, half the Indonesian Cabinet and over two-thirds of the regional governorships were military appointees. In the economy, Suharto awarded loyal military officers with lucrative monopolies, forestry concessions and access to oil. Ibnu Sutowo, a close military associate, headed the state oil company Pertamina in 1968. The system of patronage networks and system of rewards served to negate any motivation to challenge or rock the regime, hence ensuring the stability of Suharto’s rule.
mil-bureaucratic domination-Philippines
Marcos increased the role of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and gave them roles in judicial functions, economic development and management of public utilities. At the same time, Marco cultivated a base of support within the military. For example, his supporter Fabian C. Ver was promoted from Captain in 1965 to Brigadier General 1970, and was tasked with leading the National Intelligence Security Agency.
pol leaders ensure mil no political challenge- Indonesia
Suharto acted to reduce overdependence on the army by merging the army with other parts of the armed forces through regular reorganizations of the military structure and personnel as well as a cut in the army’s share of the mil budget. Suharto also fostered inter-service rivalry and rotated personnel constantly. He also acted to quickly replace personnel who opposed him. For example, Suharto appointed one of his closest aides Benny Murdani as ABRI commander. When Murdani led ABRI disagreements against Suharto, he was replaced in 1988 after only a five-year stint.