Factors effecting eye witness testimony Flashcards

1
Q

Misleadng info (bartlett)

A
  • memories are not an accurate snapshot of events and instead are ‘recinstructions’ of events, influenced by our schemas.
  • this means leading questions can influence how an event is recalled.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Post event discussion/contamination (definition)

A

When one witness alters the accuracy of recall by another witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Key study of misleading info (loftus and palmer)

A
  • 1974
  • 45 students, shown clip of traffic accidents
  • They were asked the critical leading question “how fast were the cars going when they ____ into each other”
  • Contacted= 31 mph and smashed= 40 mph.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Loftus and plamers follow up study.

A
  • 150 pps shown clip and were asked with the verb ‘hit’ or ‘smashed’ or a control group.
  • a week after they were asked “did you see broken glass”
  • smashed condition= 2x likley to say yes compared to hit condition.
  • shows long lasting changes of memory proving substitution of memory occurs rather than response bias.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

research on affect of post event discussion (Gabbert et al)

A
  • 2003
  • vids of crimes shot in different perspectives were shown to pairs pps. (a differnent percpective for each member of the pair)
  • When pps interviewed alone, 71% recalled info that wasnt in their percpective but was discussed as being in their with there pair.
  • shows memory conformity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Anxiety definition

A

Mental state of arousal including feelings of concern and tension accompanied by physiological changes.

  • EWT is usually used after viollent crimes where anxiety would be high, meaning loftus and palmers reaearch may lack validity as no anxiety was involved.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Anxiety, decreases recall theory

A
  • Reduces recall as criminals face due to the weapon focus effect.
  • Weapons are a cause for anxiety, meaning the witness focuses its attention on that.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Anxiety, increases recall theory

A
  • improves alertness and awareness of surroundings.

- strong emotions= better memory encoding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Yerks-Dodson law of arousal (inverted U)

A

-increase in anxiety raises alertness, but too high anxiety leads to stress and distraction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Key reasearch of the effects of anxiety (Johnson and scott)

A

-1976
-naive pps, placed outside a lab listening to convos.
condition 1= normal convo about equiptment failiure, man with greasy hands and pen
2= Hostile, breaking glass and falling furniture, man walks out with knife with blood.
From 50 photo options:
49% identified man with pen
33% identified man with knife

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

study supporting johnson and scott (Peters)

A
  • 1988
  • Nurse doing real injection (weapon) with researcher in the room
  • more people could identify researcher thsan the nurse
  • this is a field experiment version of J and S giving it greater ecological validity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evidence against J and S

A
  • Yuille and cutshall.
  • interviewed 13 witnesses to shooting 4 months after
  • All showed very accurate recall, aslo resisting misleading info.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Further evaluative points.

A
  • Real world applications of reasearch, eg. the cognitive interview.
  • All lab based studies have a lack of validity due to a lack of consequences. (e.g in the real would you would be under oath in a court room.
  • demand characteristics (in leading questions studies)
  • Ethical issues of J and S (protection from harm, informed consent).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly