F. PLEADINGS Flashcards
Pleadings
Pleadings are the written statements of the respective claims and defenses of the parties, submitted to the court for appropriate judgment [Sec. 1, Rule 6]
Kinds of Pleadings
- Complaint: a pleading alleging the plaintiff or claimant’s cause/s of action
- Answer: a pleading where the defending party sets forth his defenses
Note: Counterclaims, cross-claims, third-party complaints, and complaints-in-intervention are kinds of complaints. [Sec. 2, Rule 6]
Kinds of Defenses
- Negative Defense: a specific denial of the material fact or facts alleged in the pleading of the claimaint essential to his cause of action`
Note: A general denial is considered as an admission. [1 Riano 293, 2016 Bantam Ed.]
- Affirmative Defense: an allegation of a new matter which, while hypothetically admitting the material allegations in the pleading of the claimant, would nevertheless prevent or bar recovery by him/her.
The affirmative defenses include fraud, statute of limitations, release, payment, illegality, statute of frauds, estoppel, former recovery, discharge in bankruptcy, and any other matter by way of confession and avoidance.
Affirmative defenses may also include grounds for the dismissal of a complaint, specifically:
- That the court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter
- That there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause (lis pendens), or
- That the action is barred by a prior judgment. [Sec. 5 (b), Rule 6]
Note: The foregoing three (3) grounds need not be included in the answer due to the use of the word “may”. Also note that these grounds for dismissal (in addition to statute of limitations) may still be raised at any time since they are not waivable. [Sec. 1, Rule 9 in relation to Sec. 12 (a), Rule 15]
Three kinds of Specific Denials
- Absolute Denial: made when the defendant specifies each material allegation which he does not admit and, whenever practicable, sets forth the substance of the matters upon which he relies to support his denial. [PBCOM v. Go, G.R. No. 175514 (2011)]
- Partial Denial: made when the defendant does not make a total denial of the material allegations, but denies only a part of the averment. Here, he specifies which part of the truth he admits and likewise denies. [1 Riano 269, 2016 Bantam Ed.]
- Denial through disavowal of Knowledge: - made when the defendant alleges he “is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the material averments in the complaint”. [Warner Barnes v. Reyes, 103 Phil. 662 (1958)]
Negative Pregnant
A denial, pregnant with the admission of the substantial facts in the pleading responded to which are not squarely denied. It is in effect an admission of the averment it is directed to. [Philamgen v. Sweet Lines, G.R. No. 87434 (1993)]
Counterclaim
Any claim which a defending party may have against an opposing party [Sec. 6, Rule 6]
Compulsory vs. Permissive Counterclaim
[COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM]
- A compulsory counterclaim, which a party has at the time the answer is filed, shall be contained in the answer [Sec. 8, Rule 11] because a compulsory counterclaim not raised in the same action shall be barred, unless otherwise allowed by these rules. [Sec. 7, Rule 6]
- Failure to answer a compulsory counterclaim is not a cause for a default declaration.
[PERMISSIVE COUNTERCLAIM]
- Not subject to the rule on compulsory counterclaims. Hence, it may be set up as an independent action and will not be barred if not contained in an answer to the complaint.
- Must be answered by the party against whom it is interposed, otherwise he may be declared in default as to the counterclaim.
NOTE: Omitted Compulsory Counterclaim - If a counterclaim already existed at the time of the filing of the answer and the defendant fails to raise it, it shall generally be barred. [Sec. 7, Rule 6]
However, an exception to this would be a counterclaim by amendment before judgment, when the counterclaim was not set up due to oversight, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. [Sec. 10, Rule 11]
Requisites for Compulsory Counterclaim
Requisites
- It arises out of, or is connected with the transaction or occurrence constituting the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim,
- It does not require for its adjudication the presence of third parties of whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction, and
- It must be within the jurisdiction of the court both as to the amount and the nature, except that in an original action before the RTC, the counter-claim may be considered compulsory regardless of the amount. [Sec. 7, Rule 6]
Test of compulsoriness
A positive answer on all four the following tests would indicate that the counterclaim is compulsory
a. Are the issues of fact and law raised by the claim and counterclaim largely the same?
b. Would res judicata bar a subsequent suit on defendant’s claims, absent the compulsory counterclaim rule?
c. Will substantially the same evidence support or refute the plaintiff’s claim as well as the counterclaim?
d. Is there any logical relation between the claim and counterclaim?
[GSIS v. Heirs of Caballero, G.R. No. 158090 (2010)]
Effect on counterclaim when complaint is dismissed
The dismissal of the complaint shall be without prejudice to the prosecution in the same or separate action of a counterclaim pleaded in the answer in the following cases
- Dismissal under Sec. 2, Rule 17 – where the plaintiff files a motion to dismiss the case, after the defendant had filed a responsive pleading
- Dismissal under Sec. 3, Rule 17 – where the complaint is dismissed due to the fault of the plaintiff
Section 2. Dismissal upon motion of plaintiff.
xxx
If a counterclaim has been pleaded by a defendant prior to the service upon him or her of the plaintiff’s motion for dismissal, the dismissal shall be limited to the complaint. The dismissal shall be without prejudice to the right of the defendant to prosecute his or her counterclaim in a separate action unless within fifteen (15) calendar days from notice of the motion he or she manifests his or her preference to have his or her counterclaim resolved in the same action. Unless otherwise specified in the order, a dismissal under this paragraph shall be without prejudice.
Cross-claim
A cross-claim is any claim by one party against a co-party arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter either of the original action or of a counterclaim therein. Such cross- claim may cover all or part of the original claim. [Sec. 8, Rule 6]
Existing Cross-claim - A cross-claim that a defending party has at the time he or she files his or her answer shall be contained therein. [Sec. 8, Rule 11]
However, an exception to this would be a cross-claim by amendment before judgment, when the counterclaim was not set up due to oversight, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. [Sec. 10, Rule 11]
Cross-claim arising after Answer - A cross-claim, which either matured or was acquired by a party after serving his answer may, with permission of the court, be presented as a cross-claim by supplemental pleading before judgment. [Sec. 9, Rule 11]
Third (fourth, etc.) party complaints
A third (fourth, etc.) party complaint is a claim that a defending party may, with leave of court, file against a person not a party to the action, called the third (fourth, etc.)-party defendant for contribution, indemnity, subrogation or any other relief, in respect of his or her opponent’s claim. [Sec. 11, Rule 6]
Complaint-in-intervention
Intervention is a remedy by which a third party, not originally impleaded in a proceeding, becomes a litigant therein to enable him to protect or preserve a right or interest which may be affected by such proceeding. [Restaurante Las Conchas v. Llego, G.R. No. 119085 (1999), citing First Philippine Holdings Corporation v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 88345 (1996)]
Reply
A reply is a pleading, the office or function of which is to deny, or allege facts in denial or avoidance of new matters alleged in, or relating to actionable documents attached to an answer. This is so, because under the Amended Rules, the plaintiff may file a reply only if the defending party attaches an actionable document to his or her answer. [Sec. 10, Rule 6]
Note: An actionable document is a written document that’s the basis of one’s cause of action or defense. [1 Riano 280, 2016 Bantam Ed.]
Note: The function of a reply is to merely deny the allegations raised in the answer with the actionable document, not to impose new causes of action which arise from the answer.
If the plaintiff wants to interpose a new claim on the basis of the actionable document attached in the answer, he should do this through an amended or supplemental complaint.
Extension of time to file a pleading
GR: A motion for extension to file any pleading is prohibited and is considered a mere scrap of paper. [Sec. 11, Rule 11]
EXC: A motion for extension of time to file an answer may be allowed if:
- For meritorious reasons,
- For a period not more than 30 calendar days, and
- A party may only avail of 1 motion for extension
Pleadings allowed in small claims cases and cases covered by the Rules on Summary Procedure
- A small claims action is commenced by filing with the court an accomplished and verified Statement of Claim (Form 1-SCC) in duplicate, accompanied by a Certification Against Forum Shopping, Splitting a Single Cause of Action, and Multiplicity of Suits (Form 1-A-SCC) [Sec. 6]
Caption
Sets forth the: 1. Name of the court 2. Title of the action (i.e. the names of the parties and respective participation) and 3. The docket number, if assigned [Sec. 1, Rule 7]
Body
Body – Sets forth the pleading’s designation, the allegations of party’s claims or defenses, the relief prayed for, and its date
Relief
The pleading shall specify the relief sought, but it may add a general prayer for such further or other relief as may be deemed just or equitable.
General Rule: It is a settled rule that a court cannot grant a relief not prayed for by a party in the pleadings, or in excess of that being sought. [Bucal v. Bucal, G.R. No. 206957 (2015)]
Exception: Because the rules allow a general prayer for such other reliefs as may be deemed just and equitable, the court may grant reliefs that are not specifically prayed for as long as they are just and equitable. [1 Riano 257, 2016 Bantam Ed.]
Date
Every pleading shall be dated. [Sec. 2, Rule 7]
Signature and address
Every pleading and other written submissions to the court must be signed by the party or counsel representing him or her. [Sec. 3, Rule 7]
The signature of counsel constitutes a certificate that he or she has read the pleading and document and that such pleading or document:
a. Is not being presented for any improper purpose to harass, delay, or increase cost of litigation
b. Has claims, defenses, and other legal contentions that are warranted by law or jurisprudence, and not merely based on frivolous arguments contrary to jurisprudence
c. Has factual contentions that have evidentiary basis or will most likely be supported by evidence after availment of modes of discovery, and
d. The denials of facts are based on evidence or based on belief of lack of information if specially so identified. [Sec. 3, Rule 7]
Effect of violation of the rule:
The court may on motion or motu proprio, after notice and hearing, impose an appropriate sanction or refer such to the proper office for disciplinary action, unless exceptional circumstances are present.
On whom sanction imposed:
The attorney, law firm, or the party that violated the rule.
Note: The law firm shall be jointly and severally liable for a violation committed by its partner, associate, or employee.
Verification
General Rule: Pleadings need not be under oath or verified. [Sec. 4, Rule 7]
Exception: When otherwise specifically required by law or rule. [Sec. 4, Rule 7]
How Verified
By an affidavit under oath with the following attestations:
a. The allegations in the pleading are true and correct based on personal knowledge or authentic documents;
b. The pleading is not filed to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation; and
c. The factual allegations therein have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likewise have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for discovery.
The authorization of the affiant to act on behalf of the party, whether in the form of a secretary’s certificate or a special power of attorney, should be attached to the pleading. [Sec. 4, Rule 7]
Effect of noncompliance or defective verification
General Rule: A pleading required to be verified that contains a verification based on “information and belief”, or upon “knowledge, information and belief”, or lacks a proper verification, shall be treated as an unsigned pleading. [Sec. 4, Rule 7]
Note: An unsigned pleading produces no legal effect and is a “mere scrap of paper.”
Exception: Lack of verification is a mere formal, and not a jurisdictional, requirement. As such, a defect in the verification does not render the pleading fatally defective and the court may order its subsequent submission or correction if such serves the ends of justice. [Vda. de Formoso v. PNB, 650 SCRA 35 (2001)]
Certification Against Forum Shopping
The plaintiff or principal party shall certify under oath in the complaint or other initiatory pleading asserting a claim for relief or in a sworn certification annexed thereto and simultaneously filed therewith
- That he or she has not commenced any action or filed any claim involving the same issues in any court, tribunal or quasi-judicial agency and, to the best of his knowledge, no such other action is pending
- If there is such other pending action or claim, a complete statement of the present status thereof, and
- If he or she should learn that the same or a similar action or claim has been filed or is pending, he shall report that fact within 5 calendar days to the court wherein his aforesaid complaint or initiatory pleading has been filed. [Sec. 5, Rule 7
What pleadings require a certification against non-forum shopping (Initiatory pleadings)
- Complaint
- Permissive counterclaim
- Cross-claim
- Third (fourth, etc.) party complain
- Complaint-in-intervention
Who signs:
General Rule: Plaintiff or Principal party
Rationale: The plaintiff, not the counsel, is in the best position to know whether he or it has actually filed or caused the filing of a petition. Certification signed by counsel without proper authorization is defective, and a valid cause for dismissal [Anderson v. Ho, G.R. No. 172590 (2013)]
Exception: Authorized person, usually counsel
If, for justifiable reasons, the party-pleader is unable to sign, he must execute a Special Power of Attorney designating his counsel of record to sign on his behalf [Vda. de Formoso v. PNB, G.R. No. 154704 (2011)] In cases of a juridical entity, the certification may be executed by a properly authorized person through due authorization by a board resolution. [Cosco v. Kemper, 670 SCRA 343 (2012)]
Note: Similar to the new requirement under verification, the authorization of the affiant to act on behalf of the party, should be attached to the pleading.
Effect of noncompliant Certificate Against Forum Shopping
- Failure to comply with the requirements - Not curable by mere amendment of the complaint or other initiatory pleading
Cause for dismissal of the case, without prejudice, unless otherwise provided, upon motion and after hearing
- False certification/Non-compliance with any of the undertakings therein - Constitutes indirect contempt of court, without prejudice to administrative and criminal actions
- When there is willful and deliberate forum shopping - Ground for summary dismissal, with prejudice, direct contempt of court, cause for administrative sanctions
Contents of a Pleading
Every pleading stating a party’s claims or defenses shall, in addition to those mandated by Section 2, Rule 7, state the following:
a. Names of witnesses who will be presented to prove a party’s claim or defense;
b. Summary of the witnesses’ intended testimonies, provided that the judicial affidavits of said witnesses shall be attached to the pleading and form an integral part thereof, and
General Rule:
Only witnesses whose judicial affidavits areattached to the pleading shall be presented by the parties during trial.
Exception:
If a party presents meritorious reasons as basis for the admission of additional witnesses
c. Documentary and object evidence in support of the allegations contained in the pleading. [Sec. 6, Rule 7]
Allegations in a pleading
Every pleading shall contain in a methodical and logical form:
- a plain, concise and direct statement of the ultimate facts,
- the evidence on which the party pleading relies for his or her claim or defense, as the case may be
- If the cause of action or defense is based on law, the pertinent provisions of the law and its applicability. [Sec. 1, Rule 8]
Alternative causes of action
A party may set forth two or more claims or defenses alternatively in one cause of action. Such happens when a party is not certain which cause of action would squarely fit the set of facts alleged in the complaint. [1 Riano 278, 2016 Bantam Ed.]
Also. a pleading which alleges alternative causes of action is not made insufficient by the insufficiency of one or more of the alternative statements as long as one of them is sufficient. [Sec. 2, Rule 8]
What must be alleged in a pleading?
- Capacity to sue or be sued
- General averments
- Averments with particularity
Capacity to sue or be sued
The following must be averred, to wit:
a. Facts showing the capacity of a person to sue or be sued,
b. The authority of a party, to sue and be sued in a representative capacity, or
c. The legal existence of an organized association of persons that is made a party.
Moreover, a party desiring to raise an issue as to the legal existence of any party to sue or be sued in a representative capacity must do so via specific denial. [Sec. 4, Rule 8]