Eye Witness Testimonys Flashcards
What does EWT refer to
Evidence provide by those recalling an event who were present when the event took pace
What did Bartlett state about the influence of schema
- memory is not like a camera
- memory is reconstructed based on previous experience and expectations
- our existing experiences and expectations form schemas
- schemas override what we actually see
- schemas are individual but also reflect cultural expectations and stereotypes all of which can cause distortions in recall
What can distortions in recall affect in EWT
Cause a miscarriage of justice
2 factors that effect EWT
- misleading information
- anxiety
What is the effect of misleading info on EWT
Refers to info that suggests a particular response which is actually not accurate
2 types of misleading info
- leading questions
- post event discussion
What is a leading question
Questions that increase the likelihood that an individual schemas will influence them to give an inaccurate answer
What is post event discussion
- Inaccurate information can be added to a witnesses memory of an event through something they hear mentioned after an event - post event information
- occurs because of co witnesses discussing what they saw
Who researched the effect of misleading information
Loftus and palmer
Loftus and palmer experiment 1 - effect of leading questions
procedure
- 45 university students were shown 7 video clips of car crashes
- divided it to 5 groups with 9 ptps
- write down their account of what they could recall after each accident
- they where asked the key question how fast were the cars going when they … with each other
- blank was filled with either hit smashed collided bumped or contacted
- ptps estimation of the speed was recorded
Finding
- contacted = 31.8 mph
- hit = 34.0 mph
- bumped = 38.mph
- collided = 39.3 mph
- smashed = 40.8 mph
Conclusion
- demonstrates that the verb used in the question can have an effect on the estimated speed
- supports assumption that leading questions can have an effect on the accuracy of EWT
Loftus and palmer - experiment 2 - research into the effect of post event info
Procedure
- 150 students ptps viewed a video of a car crash
- questions on what they saw
- 50 ptps asked a key question (same as experiment 1 ) with word smashed
- 50 ptps asked key question with with word hit
- 50 ptps not asked key question
- 1 week later they where questioned about their memory pf the even and was asked if they saw any Brocken glass - there wasn’t any
Findings
Answer Smashed Hit Control
Yes 16 7 6
No 34 43 44
Conclusion
- misleading info in the form of post event info can affect the accuracy of recall of EWT
Gabbert et al - research into post event discussion on accurcay of eye witness testimony
Procedure
- ptps watched a video of girl stealing money from a wallet
- ptps tested individually (controlled) or in pairs (co-witness groups)
- ptps in co witness group were told that they had watched the same video but had seen different perspectives of the same crime and only one person witnessed the girl stealing
- co witness groups discussed crime together
- all ptps completed a questionnaire
- tested uni students and older adults
Findings
- 71% of the witnesses in co witness groups recalled info they had not actually seen
-60% said girl was guilty, despite not seeing her commit the crime
- little difference between groups studied
Conclusion
- post event discussion can have a powerful effect on the accuracy on eye witness testimony
What is post event discussion
Discuss what they have seen with other witnesses
Distort their own memory of an event
Post event info
Witnesses receive info about the crime
Which can distort their own memory of crime eg through media and police
Strengths of research into the effect of misleading questions
Importance of research
- Contributed to better understanding of how misleading information affects EWT
- developed better questioning techniques for police when dealing with witnesses