explanations for forgetting: retrieval failure Flashcards
Encoding Specificity Principle
Tulving (1983) - reviewed research into retrieval failure & summarised a pattern called the’ Encoding Specificity Principle
- if a cue is to help us recall information it has to be present at encoding & at retrieval
Why do we forget according to the theory?
due to a lack of cues
- linked to meaningfully to the information to be remembered
- not linked meaningfully to the information to be remembered
How do we encode information when we learn it?
- encode context (external cues )
- mental state we are in ( internal cues)
Context dependant forgetting
Can occur when the environment during recall is different from the environment you were in when you were learning ( eg = room you are in)
Context dependant forgetting: Godden & Baddeley (1975) - aim
investigate the effect of environment on recall
Context dependant forgetting: Godden & Baddeley (1975) - procedure
- 18 divers from a diving club were asked to learn lists of 36 unrelated words in 4 different conditions
- learn & recall on the beach = 13.5
- learn on the beach & recall under water = 8.6
- learn under water & recall on the beach = 8.5
- learn & recall under water = 11.4
Context dependant forgetting: Godden & Baddeley (1975) - conclusions
- when divers recalled and learnt in the same environment the recall overall was better
- the recall was lower when they learnt and recalled in different environments
Evaluation of Godden & Baddeley (1975) - high ecological validity (strength)
- not a lab study
- no artificial stimuli, controlled environment etc.
Evaluation of Godden & Baddeley (1975) - lack of control variable (weakness)
- on a beach/underwater which means there are a lot more variables that can’t be controlled
- may affect the results of the study
State-dependant forgetting
occurs when your mood or physiological state during recall is different from the mood you were when learning
State-dependant forgetting : Goodwin et al (1969) - procedure
- 48 volunteer male medical students participated and randomly assigned to 4 groups
- GROUP 1 = sober on both days
- GROUP 2 = intoxicated on both days
- GROUP 3 = intoxicated on day 1 and sober day 2
GROUP 4 = sober on day 1 and intoxicated on day 2 - they then had to perform 4 tests : avoidance task , verbal rote-learning task , word-association test & picture recognition
State-dependant forgetting : Goodwin et al (1969) - results
- more errors made on day 2 in the AS and SA condition than AA or SS conditions (40% lower)
State-dependant forgetting : Goodwin et al (1969) - conclusions
SS & AA recall & learning had the best recall
Evaluation of Goodwin et al (1969) : ecological validity (strength)
- not a lab study so no artificial stimuli
- an everyday situation so it can be generalised to everyday life easily
Evaluation of Goodwin et al (1969) : control of variables (weakness)
- more natural environment so less control over variables
- more difficult to establish cause & effect