explanations for forgetting: retrieval failure Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Encoding Specificity Principle

A

Tulving (1983) - reviewed research into retrieval failure & summarised a pattern called the’ Encoding Specificity Principle

  • if a cue is to help us recall information it has to be present at encoding & at retrieval
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why do we forget according to the theory?

A

due to a lack of cues
- linked to meaningfully to the information to be remembered
- not linked meaningfully to the information to be remembered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do we encode information when we learn it?

A
  • encode context (external cues )
  • mental state we are in ( internal cues)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Context dependant forgetting

A

Can occur when the environment during recall is different from the environment you were in when you were learning ( eg = room you are in)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Context dependant forgetting: Godden & Baddeley (1975) - aim

A

investigate the effect of environment on recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Context dependant forgetting: Godden & Baddeley (1975) - procedure

A
  • 18 divers from a diving club were asked to learn lists of 36 unrelated words in 4 different conditions
    1. learn & recall on the beach = 13.5
    2. learn on the beach & recall under water = 8.6
    3. learn under water & recall on the beach = 8.5
    4. learn & recall under water = 11.4
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Context dependant forgetting: Godden & Baddeley (1975) - conclusions

A
  • when divers recalled and learnt in the same environment the recall overall was better
  • the recall was lower when they learnt and recalled in different environments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluation of Godden & Baddeley (1975) - high ecological validity (strength)

A
  • not a lab study
  • no artificial stimuli, controlled environment etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluation of Godden & Baddeley (1975) - lack of control variable (weakness)

A
  • on a beach/underwater which means there are a lot more variables that can’t be controlled
  • may affect the results of the study
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

State-dependant forgetting

A

occurs when your mood or physiological state during recall is different from the mood you were when learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

State-dependant forgetting : Goodwin et al (1969) - procedure

A
  • 48 volunteer male medical students participated and randomly assigned to 4 groups
  • GROUP 1 = sober on both days
  • GROUP 2 = intoxicated on both days
  • GROUP 3 = intoxicated on day 1 and sober day 2
    GROUP 4 = sober on day 1 and intoxicated on day 2
  • they then had to perform 4 tests : avoidance task , verbal rote-learning task , word-association test & picture recognition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

State-dependant forgetting : Goodwin et al (1969) - results

A
  • more errors made on day 2 in the AS and SA condition than AA or SS conditions (40% lower)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

State-dependant forgetting : Goodwin et al (1969) - conclusions

A

SS & AA recall & learning had the best recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluation of Goodwin et al (1969) : ecological validity (strength)

A
  • not a lab study so no artificial stimuli
  • an everyday situation so it can be generalised to everyday life easily
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation of Goodwin et al (1969) : control of variables (weakness)

A
  • more natural environment so less control over variables
  • more difficult to establish cause & effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation of retrieval failure: real-world application (strength)

A
  • although context cues don’t have a huge effect on forgetting it is still worth using & paying attention to
  • For example, they may not help you pass an exam ) but they may help you remember why you went upstairs to get something.
17
Q

Evaluation of retrieval failure: supporting evidence (strength)

A
  • Godden & Baddeley = divers study
  • Goodwin et al = drunk/sober medical students
  • all support the validity of the explanations of forgetting (retrieval failure) & both have high ecological validity
  • Eysenck (2010) says retrieval failure is the main reason we forget
18
Q

Evaluation of retrieval failure: questioning context effects (weakness)

A
  • Baddeley says that context effects aren’t very strong especially in real-life
  • different contexts have to be very different for it to work such as land or water but changing rooms isn’t enough
  • explanations don’t explain forgetting in the LTM
19
Q

Evaluation of retrieval failure: recall vs recognition (weakness)

A
  • context effect may only be related to the kind of memory being used
  • Godden & Baddeley looked at recall not recognition & when they did they found no context dependant effect & performance was the same in all 4
  • the presence or absence of cues only affects memory when you test it in a certain way
20
Q

Evaluation of retrieval failure: problems with the encoding specificity principle (weakness)

A
  • some say this can’t actually really be tested
  • because we can’t actually test if the cue was there at encoding
  • meaning we can’t establish if the cues have been encoded