capacity , duration & coding Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Short-term memory

A

limited capacity store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Long-term memory

A

permanent memory store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Capacity

A

Amount of information that can be held in a memory store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Duration

A

Length of time information can be held in memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Coding

A

Format which information is stored in the various memory stores such as semantic, acoustic and visual.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Capacity of STM: Jacobs (1887)

A
  • used the digit span technique in his lab experiment
  • found that the average span for digits was 9.3 & 7.3 for letters
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Capacity of STM: Miller (1956)

A
  • reviewed psychological research which concluded that the span of immediate memory is on average 7 items
  • did this by observing everyday practices (things that come in 7’s - 7 days of the week)
  • developed 7 + or -2
  • noticed that people can recall 5 words as well as 5 letters (done by chunking)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Chunking

A

grouping sets of digits or letters into chunks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluation of capacity STM: validity of the research (weakness)

A
  • Jacobs study is very old and may have lacked control which meant ppts may have not performed as well as they could have ( confounding variable = noise)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluation of capacity STM: validity of the research (strength)

A

However, it has been replicated and further studies have confirmed the results which support it’s validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluation of capacity STM: overestimation of the capacity (weakness)

A
  • Miller may have overestimated the capacity of the STM
  • Cowan (2011) reviewed research and found the capacity was about 4 chunks
  • Suggests that the lower end of Miller’s estimate is more appropriate to use
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Capacity of STM

A

5-9 items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Duration of STM: Peterson & Peterson (1959)

A
  • used 24 students to study duration of STM
  • ppts were given a consonant syllable & 3 digit number
  • asked to recall the consonant syllable after a retention interval of 3,6,9,12,15,18
  • they had to count back from the 3 digit number
  • after 3 seconds ppts were 90% correct , after 9 ppts were 20% correct & after 18 seconds 2% correct
  • suggests duration is short and less than 18 seconds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Duration of LTM: Bahrick et al (1975)

A
  • tested 400 aged 17-74 on the memory of classmates consisted a recognition test of 50 photos
  • in a free recall test ppts were asked to list names they could remember from their graduating class
  • ppts tested with 15 years of graduation were 90% accurate in identifying faces & 60% accurate on free recall
  • after 48 years it declined to about 70% for photo recognition & 30% on the free recall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation of duration STM: artificial studies (weakness)

A
  • stimulus material was artificial as the consonant syllable doesn’t reflect real-life memory tasks
  • lacks external validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation of duration LTM: external validity (strengths)

A
  • high external validity as real-life memories were studied
  • confounding variables can’t be controlled
  • ppts may have looked at the yearbook
17
Q

Duration of STM

A

18-30 seconds

18
Q

Duration of LTM

A

forever or infinite

19
Q

Semantic memory

A

meaning of a word

20
Q

Visual memory

A

what the words look like

21
Q

Acoustic memory

A

what the word sounds like

22
Q

Coding of STM & LTM: Baddeley (1996)

A
  • gave different lists of words to 4 groups of ppts to remember
  • GROUP 1 & 2: acoustically similar & dissimilar words ( test STM)
  • GROUP 3 & 4: semantically similar & dissimilar words (test LTM)
  • ppts tended to do worse on acoustically similar words (STM)
  • ppts tended to do worse on semantically similar words (STM)
23
Q

Evaluation of coding STM & LTM: artificial stimuli (weakness)

A
  • used artificial stimuli rather than memory tasks
  • difficult to generalise findings to real-life
  • findings have limited application
24
Q

Evaluation of coding STM & LTM: separate memory stores (strength)

A
  • research identifies a clear difference between 2 memory stores
  • that is an important step in research & led to the development of a multi-store model of memory
25
Q

Coding of STM

A

acoustic

26
Q

Coding of LTM

A

semantic