Explanations for forgetting: Interference Flashcards
What is the definition of interference?
Forgetting because one memory blocks another, causing one or both memories to be distorted or forgotten
What are the 2 types of interference?
Proactive and retroactive
What is proactive intereference?
When old memories disrupt the recall of newer memories
What is retroactive interference?
When new memories disrupt the recall of old memories already stored
Why does similarity affect recall?
Proactive - previously stored information makes new simialr information more difficult to store.
Retroactive - new information overwrites similar memories due to similarity.
Effects of similarity study - McGeoch and McDonald
PROCEDURE
- They changed amount of similarity between 2 sets of materials.
- Learnt 10 words until they could remember them 100% accurately.
- Then learnt a new list: 6 groups oof participants.
What were the 6 groups in the effects of similarity study?
1) Synonyms - same meanings as originals
2) Antonyms - words with opposite meanings
3) Words unrelated to originals
4) Consonant syllables
5) 3 digit numbers
6) Participants just rested
What were the general results of the effects of similarity study?
3 digit numbers were recalled more often than the other groups
What was the conclusion of the effects of similarity study?
When the participants were asked to recall the original list of words, the most similar material produced the worst recall.
What is a strength of the interference explanation? - Real world examples (Baddeley and Hitch)
- Baddeley and Hitch (1977) - rugby players
- Were asked to remember who they played against.
- Players had played different numbers of games over the season.
- Most games played = poorest recall.
What is a limitation of this explanation? - Only a partial explanation
- Lab studies can be set up with ideal conditions for interference. e.g = similar sets of words
- These conditions are rare in real life.
- Forgetting may be better explained by other theories such as retrieval failure.
What is a limitation of the interference explanation? - Interference can be overcome using cues
Tulving and Psotka study:
- Participants had lists of words in different categories.
- Recall of first list was 70%. Got worse for each new list.
- When a cue was given, recall for later lists rose to 70%.
- Forgetting is due to a loss of accessibility not availability.