experiments, self-reports, case studies, aims and hypothesis Flashcards

1
Q

What is the independent variable? (IV)

A

the variable that psychologists manipulate or change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the dependent variable? (DV)

A

the variable that psychologists measure. It’s always hoped that the IV is directly affecting the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two IV conditions?

A

experimental condition and control condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the control condition?

A

it is an IV condition, which is exposed to all of the experiment but not what is being changed or tested. It is used as a comparison group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the experimental condition?

A

an IV condition, which is exposed to all of the experiment and the one variable being tested

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the three kinds of experiments?

A

laboratory, field, and natural

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the two strengths of laboratory experiments?

A

They have high levels of standardisation so they can be replicated to test for reliability.
They have high levels of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the three weaknesses of laboratory experiments?

A

since they take place in an artificial setting, they may lack ecological validity.
in many experiments, participants take part in tasks that are nothing like real-life, so it can lack mundane realism.
participants know they are in an experiment so they may respond to demand characteristics as something about the set-up indicates the aim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is a field experiment?

A

they take place in participants’ own natural environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the two strengths of a field experiment?

A

they have high ecological validity.

Behaviour is more likely to be natural and valid as the participant does not know they are in an experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the two weaknesses of a field experiment?

A

situational variables can be difficult to control, sometimes it is difficult to know if it is IV affecting the DV - it could be an uncontrolled variable causing the DV to change.
as participants do not know they are taking part in a study, there are issues with breaking ethical guidelines.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are the two strengths of a natural experiment?

A

The study has high ecological validity
Since the participants are usually unaware that they are
in a study, their behaviour is more likely to be natural

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the two weaknesses of a natural experiment?

A

It can be difficult to know whether the IV has caused an effect on the DV due to lack of controls. Therefore, it is difficult to establish a cause-effect relationship.
it can be difficult to replicate the study for reliability, as it is naturally occurring.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

explain the validity of laboratory experiments

A

They have high internal validity because of the controls in place. However, the external validity is low as it may be difficult to apply the findings to a real-life situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explain the validity of field experiments

A

they have lower internal validity as researchers can control some variables but not all. there is stronger external validity due to the “field” setting of the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

explain the validity of natural experiments

A

they have low internal validity as there is no control of extraneous variables. There is high external validity as the experiment’s take place in the participants’ natural environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

explain the reliability of laboratory experiments

A

there are high levels of reliability as controls and standardised procedures allow for full replication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

explain the reliability of field experiments

A

medium levels of reliability as some elements of the study are controlled with some standardised procedures; however full replication may be difficult.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

explain the reliability of natural experiments

A

low levels of reliability as there are hardly any controls or standardisation, which makes replication difficult.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

explain the ethics of laboratory experiments

A

it is usually easy to gain informed consent. deception can be dealt with if participants are given a full debrief. participants know they are in a study so they can withdraw at any time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

explain the ethics of field experiments

A

it is not always possible to gain informed consent. Participants may not know they are part of a study which can make debriefing difficult or impossible. (also the participants do not know they are in a study so their right to withdraw is invalidated.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

explain the ethics of natural experiments

A

there are several ethical issues. informed consent can be difficult to obtain. Participants may not know they are part of a study which can make debriefing difficult or impossible. (also the participants do not know they are in a study so their right to withdraw is invalidated.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what are the four kinds of questionnaires?

A

likert scales
rating scales
open-ended questions
closed questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what is a likert scale?

A

it uses statements that participants read, then state whether they “strongly agree”, “disagree” etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
what is a rating scale?
questions or statements where the participant gives an answer in the form of a number
26
what are the two strengths of questionnaires?
participants may be more likely to reveal truthful answers as it does not involve talking face to face. a large sample of participants can answer the questionnaire in a short time span, which increases the representativeness and generalisability of the findings
27
what are the two weaknesses of questionnaires?
participants may give socially desirable answers as they want to look good, which lowers the validity of the findings if the questionnaire has a lot of closed questions the participant may be forced into choosing as answer that does not reflect their true opinion.
28
what are the three types of interviews?
structured unstructured semi-structured
29
what are structured interviews?
structured interviews have a set order of questions and each participant are asked the questions in the set order
30
what are unstructured interviews?
they have a theme or topic that needs to be discussed, the interviewer may have an initial question to begin the interview but each subsequent question is based on the response given.
31
what are semi-structured interviews?
they contain certain questions that participants must be asked, those questions are asked in the order the interviewer chooses and the interviewer can ask other questions to clarify a participants response.
32
what is the strength of interviews?
if the interview has a lot of open questions the participants will reveal more
33
what is the weakness of interviews?
participants may be less likely to give truthful answers as they are face to face and may not want to be judged.
34
what is a case study, word for word, according to Shaugnessy and Zechmeister (1997)?
a case study is "...an intensive description and analysis of a single individual"
35
who came up with the definition of a case study, and when?
Shaugnessy and Zechmeister (1997)
36
is a case study a research method?
no, they simply use other research methods in a quest for drawing a conclusion.
37
are variables controlled or altered in case studies?
no
38
what is a case study?
case studies are simply in-depth detailed analyses of individuals or close-knit groups of people.
39
where does a laboratory experiment take place?
in a situation of environment that is artificial to participants
40
what level of control do researchers have over variables in laboratory experiments?
there is a high level of control as researchers attempt to control as many variables as possible to make sure that it is the IV affecting the DV
41
is a standardised procedure necessary in laboratory experiments, and why?
there is usually an attempt for standardised procedures, as this makes it easier to replicate the experiment for reliability
42
do laboratory experiments have ecological validity?
since they take place in an artificial setting, they may lack ecological validity.
43
do laboratory experiments have mundane realism?
in many experiments, participants take part in tasks that are nothing like real-life, so it can lack mundane realism.
44
explain the concept of demand characteristics in laboratory experiments
participants know they are in an experiment so they may respond to demand characteristics as something about the set-up indicates the aim.
45
do field experiments have ecological validity?
they have high ecological validity.
46
is the behaviour likely to be natural in a field experiment?
Behaviour is more likely to be natural and valid as the participant does not know they are in an experiment
47
explain the situational variables in a field experiment
sometimes it is difficult to know if it is IV affecting the DV - it could be an uncontrolled variable causing the DV to change.
48
are field experiments ethical?
as participants do not know they are taking part in a study, there are issues with breaking ethical guidelines.
49
where does a natural experiment take place?
they usually take place in a real-life situation (eg. workplace or a hospital)
50
what kind of IV's do researchers use in natural experiments?
a pre-existing or naturally occurring IV
51
can researchers always manipulate the IV's in a natural experiment?
there are certain instances where researchers cannot manipulate the IV
52
do natural experiments have ecological validity?
The study has high ecological validity
53
how valid is participants behaviour in a natural experiment?
Since the participants are usually unaware that they are | in a study, their behaviour is more likely to be natural
54
how much control do researchers have on variables in natural experiments?
It can be difficult to know whether the IV has caused an effect on the DV due to lack of controls. Therefore, it is difficult to establish a cause-effect relationship.
55
is it difficult to replicate a natural experiment?
it can be difficult to replicate the study for reliability, as it is naturally occurring.
56
what makes a questionnaire better than interviews in terms of reliability?
participants may be more likely to reveal truthful answers as it does not involve talking face to face.
57
how are questionnaires representative and generalised?
a large sample of participants can answer the questionnaire in a short time span, which increases the representativeness and generalisability of the findings
58
how can the answers to questionnaires be influenced to decrease validity?
participants may give socially desirable answers as they want to look good, which lowers the validity of the findings
59
why is it not a good idea to have many closed questions on questionnaires?
if the questionnaire has a lot of closed questions the participant may be forced into choosing as answer that does not reflect their true opinion.
60
in what form are interview answers given?
responses are in spoken form
61
how many main types of interviews are there?
three
62
what does correlation mean?
the relationship between two measured variables.
63
what are correlational designs?
they look for relationships between the measures collected from other research methods
64
how many categories of correlational designs are there?
three
65
name the categories of correlational design
positive correlation negative correlation no correlation
66
what does positive correlation mean?
if one variable increases, the second variable is also likely to increase
67
what does negative correlation mean?
if one measured variable increases, the other measured variable will decrease
68
what does no correlation mean?
refers to the situation where no definite trend occurs and the two measured variables do not appear to be related to each other.
69
what are the two strengths of correlations?
correlations are good for showing the relationship between two variables. correlations do not require any manipulation. so correlations can be used where experiments are either unethical or impractical.
70
what are the two weaknesses of correlations?
there are issues of causality. if a correlation is reported in a study, researchers do not know if variable A is causing a change in variable B or vice versa. there could also be a third variable causing changes in A and B that has not been measured. correlations are restricted to research where measurements are quantitative so cannot be used to investigate why behaviours are occurring.
71
what does the aim mean?
a statement or question that tells people what the purpose of the study is.
72
what is a hypothesis?
it predicts the findings of a study
73
when is a hypothesis written?
before the study
74
what are the two kinds of hypothesis?
directional or non-directional
75
what is an alternative name for a directional hypothesis?
one-tailed
76
what is an alternative name for a non-directional hypothesis?
two-tailed
77
what is a directional hypothesis?
it predicts a significant difference or correlation and also the direction of results
78
what is a non-directional hypothesis?
it predicts a difference of correlation but not the expected direction of results
79
what is an inferential statistical test?
it calculates how far the actual findings have deviated from chance
80
when is a null hypothesis necessary?
if you are going to use an inferential statistical test to examine whether you have found a significant difference or correlation
81
what is internal validity?
it refers to whether it is the IV directly affecting the DV (and not some other variable/s)
82
what is external validity?
it refers to the extent to which the findings can be applied to real-life settings and other people outside the study
83
what is the experimental design?
it refers to how they allocate participants to the varying conditions of the experiment
84
what are independent measures?
when a participant only takes part in one level of the IV
85
when must an independent measure be used?
if the IV is naturally occurring
86
how are participants allocated to a level of the IV in a true independent measures design?
randomly
87
what are the two strengths of independent measures?
reduced likely hood of demand characteristics, since participants are only in one condition and therefore less likely to guess the aim. there are no order effects.
88
what are the two weaknesses of independent measures?
participant variables could affect the DV instead of the IV. | more participants are required
89
what are repeated measures?
when a participant takes part in all of the levels of the IV
90
when should a repeated measure not be used?
if the IV is naturally occurring
91
what are the two strengths of repeated measures?
it eliminates any effect of participant variables. | fewer participants are needed
92
what are the two weaknesses of repeated measures?
there is a chance of demand characteristics, as participants may work out the aim of the study. order effects can affect the findings of the study and reduce its validity.
93
give an example of an order effect
practice effect: participants get better at a task when they complete a similar one or the task for the second time