experiments Flashcards

1
Q

important studies

A

milgram, bandura

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

laboratory experiments

A

controlled environment to test hypotheses

experimental group - where the independent variable is changed

control group - no change to independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

practical strengths of lab experiments

A

cost / time - can be done quite quickly if facilities are readily available and at little cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

practical limitations of lab experiments

A

control of variables - society is complex - cant control all variables

snapshot - no historical dimension

small sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ethical strength of lab studies

A

beneficial for society - provide outcomes useful to society

debriefing - negate some issues of lack of informed consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ethical limitation of lab experiments

A

informed consent - some people may not understand the nature of the experiment

harm - can cause distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

theoretical strengths of lab experiments

A

reliability - can be repeated and statistical analysis checked

detachment

objectivity

cause and effect

positivism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

theoretical limitations of lab experiments

A

validity - part of experiment - hawthorne effect

ecological validity

representativeness - small scale

interpretivism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

positivist perspective on lab experiments

A

favour lab experiments - causal laws to be established
- manipulation of independent variable and measuring effect on dependent variable

objective - valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

interpretivist perspective on lab experiments

A

do not produce valid, accurate data - artificial environment and do not encourage natural behaviour

cannot reveal how interactions occur between people and only produce a snap shot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

feminist perspective on lab experiments

A

create an unequal power relationship between dominant research and compliant participant

often male scientist - ignore female experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

field experiments

A

take place in subject’s natural environment

Rosenthal and Jacobson - pygmalion in classroom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

practical strengths of field experiments

A

access - study groups who would not grant access in controlled setting- Rosenhan - students admitted to psychiatric hospitals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

practical limitations of field experiments

A

access - small number of participants due to opportunistic sampling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ethical strengths of field experiments

A

useful for society - field experiments tell sociologists about how individuals behave

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ethical limitations of field experiments

A

informed consent - often deceived about the true nature of the research or unaware part of experiment - covert study

17
Q

theoretical strengths of field experiments

A

validity - research takes place in wider society so people should behave more natural manner

validity - true nature of research is often kept covert - less impact of expectancy effect and hawthorne effect

18
Q

theoretical limitation of field experiments

A

validity - if know part of experiment - hawthorne effect

control of variables - harder to control variables in the field

reliability - difficult to accurately replicate

19
Q

positivist perspectives of field experiments

A

lack in validity - harder to control extraneous variables that may affect participant behaviour separately from independent variable

reduces objectivity of field experiments and minimises accuracy of patterns of causation

20
Q

interpretivists perspectives on field experiments

A

favour over lab experiments

involve observations and analysis of more natural behaviour

argue the structured nature of field experiments and resulting quantitative data limits validity

does say why for behaviour - triangulation

21
Q

the comparative method

A

cause and effect relationships

groups identified by sociologist for being similar is all aspects bar one variable we are interested in then compare groups

22
Q

practical strengths of comparative method

A

fewer responses needed - reducing need for expenses and training

23
Q

practical limitation of comparative method

A

control over variables - harder to accurately control all relevant variables so limited validity and research may not be relevant

24
Q

ethical strength of comparative method

A

ethical issues - should avoid issues of causing harm and gaining informed consent

25
Q

ethical limitations of comparative method

A

sensitive issues - involves analysing data and establishing causal laws through the inductive meethod

  • cold and clinical way of researching sensitive topics eg suicide - Durkheim
26
Q

theoretical strengths of comparative method

A

artificiality - less artificial than studying groups in laboratory so should have higher ecological validity

historical - can be used to study past events and groups

27
Q

theoretical limitations of comparative method

A

a thought experiment - groups selected may differ by more than one variable

validity - data you collect may not be accurate

28
Q

positivist perspective on comparative method

A

if conducted using quantitative data - good way of establishing causal laws

involves induction - sociologists analyses evidence in objective way and creates hypothesis

29
Q

interpretivist perspective on comparative method

A

does not favour comparative method due to the reliance on quantitative data that can easily be distorted to lack validity