Experimental Design Flashcards
it refers to?
how people are ALLOCATED to different conditions/ IV levels in an experiment
most common way to design an experiment= divide them into 2 groups: EG & CG- then introduce a change to EG; not the CG- the researcher must then decide HOW she’ll allocate her sample to the IV levels
What is Independent measures design aka?
BETWEEN groups
How does IMD work?
- different participants are used in EACH condition of the IV
- means that EACH condition of the experiment includes a different group of PPs
- should be done by RANDOM ALLOCATION: ensures that EACH PP has an EQUAL chance of being assigned to EITHER condition
- thus involves 2 SEPARATE groups of participants; one in EACH condition
Strengths of an IMD
avoids order effects as participate in 1 condition only- ex: fatigue & practice effects
Limitations of an IMD
- more people are needed than w/ RMD so more time consuming & $$
- Participant variables (type of EV)- differences between participants in the groups may affect results
how to control PVs in an IMD
AFTER they’ve been recruited, they should be RANDOMLY ALLOCATED to their groups
this ensures the groups are SIMILAR, on average- thus reducing PVs
What is a Repeated Measures Design aka?
- WITHIN groups
Format of a RMD
the SAME participants take part in EACH condition of the IV- means EACH condition contains the SAME group of PPs
Strengths of RMDs
- fewer people needed as they take part in ALL conditions- so saves time & $$
- as the SAME PPs are used in each condition, PVs= reduced
Cons of RMDs
- there may be order effects
- BUT this can be controlled by COUNTERBALANCING
counterbalancing
- to combat OEs the researcher counterbalances the ORDER of the conditions for the participants
- ALTERNATING the order in which PPs perform indifferent conditions of an experiment
- ABBA (EG: A, CG: B- G1 does A then B, G2 does B then A)
- although OEs occur for each participant, because they occur EQUALLY in both groups, they BALANCE each other out in the results
What is Matched Pairs Design?
- each condition uses different but SIMILAR PPs
- an effort is made to MATCH the PPs in each condition in terms of wichtig individual differences which may affect performance- ex: age, IQ, etc
- 1 member of each MP must be RANDOMLY ASSIGNED to the EG & the other to the CG
Strengths of MPDs?
- reduces PVs because the researcher has tried to pair up PPs so that EACH condition has people w/ similar abilities
- avoids OEs so counterbalancing NOT necessary
Limitations of MPDs
- if 1 PP drops out you LOSE 2 PPs’ data
- v time consuming to find closely MPs
- impossible to match people EXACTLY- bar identical twins
Control of MPDs
members of EACH pair should be RANDOMLY ASSIGNED to the conditions- however NOT a panacea