Experiment 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Aim

A

To investigate whether personally meaningful information is able to break through the inattentional barrier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sample

A

12 undergraduate students or research workers from Oxford university

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Independent variable

A

Whether an instruction within a rejected passage was proceeded by the participants name

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dependent variable

A

Whether participants were more likely to hear an instruction in a message they’re not paying attention to if it is preceded by their name.
This was operationalised by whether they reported hearing it or did the instruction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Procedure

A
  • two passages of light fiction heard, one in one ear, the other in the other ear
  • both passages contained an instruction at the start, and another within them
    -both passages read at monotone by male voice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Results

A

Each experienced same ten passages in same order making it repeated measures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Affective instructions

A

Instruction presented 39
Instruction heard 20

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Non affective instruction

A

Instruction presented 36
Instruction heard 4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conclusions

A

Participants far more likely to hear instructions that were affective
They were more likely to follow the instruction and switch ears when they heard the instruction ,I’d way through

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly