Exclusion and limitation clauses Flashcards
What are exclusion clauses
Exclusion clauses exclude or limit liability for breach of the contract
In general, the courts allow the parties to agree any terms they like under freedom of contract, however, as one party may be much stronger than the other the court have found ways to limit the effectiveness of exclusion clauses
How will courts decide whether an exclusion course is part of a contract
- Whether the agreement is signed
- Whether any notice with the term in it is incorporated in the contract
- Whether the term is incorporated as a result of previous dealings with the parties
Thornton v Shoe lane parking
Exclusion course not part of the contract so could not be effective
L’Estrange v Graucob 1934
- whether the agreement is signed
exclusion clause was part of the contract as it was in written form that she signed so she accepted it
Later on, the Consumer Act 2015 stated that you cannot exclude liability for implied terms
Curtis v Chemical Cleaning
- whether the agreement was signed
the effect of an oral statement - if you do not understand something in a contract and you ask, whatever they reply with becomes the exclusion clause
whether any notice with the term in it is incorporated in the contract
If the contract isn’t signed the exclusion clause must be brought to the attention of the offeree at the time the contract is made
Olley v Marlborough
- Whether any notice with the term in it is incorporated in the contract
they were not made aware of that exclusion clause when they made the agreement at the reception
Hollier v Rambler Motors
- Whether the term is incorporated as a result of previous dealings with the parties
exclusion clauses can be implied in a contract through previous dealings but only if they are frequent
The Contra Proferentem rule
Where there is doubt about the meaning of a term in a contract, the words will be construed against the person who put them in the contract (courts will interpret it against the person who wrote it)
Transocean Drilling UK ltd v Province Resources plc
exclusion clause is not clear, but because of the agreement being sophisticated, it stood (the rule is used when the term is both one-sided and ambiguous)
McCutcheon v David MacBrayne
not part of the contract as too vague if the exclusion clause is always part of the contract