Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

AS Psychology > Exam questions > Flashcards

Exam questions Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Psychology 101 flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards AP® Psychology flashcards
1
Q

From the study by Dement and Kleitman identify one reason for using EEG to measure brain activity

A

which stage of sleep the participants are in REm/nREM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Two ethical guidelines are debriefing and informed consent. Suggest how ethical. issues raised in the Piliavin et al. study (subway Samaritans) relate to these two ethical guidelines (4)

A

Debriefing:
Participants did not know they were part of the study, did not have the aims explained or time for questions — psychological harm

Informed consent:
No one knew this was going to happened as consent did not happen —> exposed to a situation which may have cause psychological harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe one assumption of the social approach (2)

A

Behavior cognition and emotion can be influenced by groups or social contexts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Outline one other real-world application based on the finding from the Milgram’s study

A

65% went to the end 450V under authority figure. — People follow orders from authority figures. When crime happens find authority figure to stop the crime from happening.

Helped us find understand why WW2 may have happened (destructive obedience)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strengths of Dement and Kleitmen (8)

A

Standardized - doorbell (every participant experienced the same thing)
High reliability - EEG quantitative data, is not affected by experimenters subjective view: both quantitative data and qualitative data is collected
Demand characters minimized: did not tell participants about EEG patterns
Operationalised : meaning of dreams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weakness of Dement & Kleitmen (ethics) (6)

A

Low generalizability: small sample
Ethics: participant WD deception misled about REM and nREM
Low ecological validity: sleeping in a lab / no caffeine / alchohol

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Eye movements (8)

A
  1. Vertical : throwing basketball - looking down to see one
  2. Horizontal : watching people throw tomatoes at each other
  3. Little movement: driving / looking at something at a distance
  4. Mixed: giving a speech
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Dream recall when woke up in REM %

A

79.6%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Time guessing Dement and Kleitmen (2)

A

88% - 5 mins 78 - 15 mins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hasset et al. Sample (3)

A

82 Rhesus monkeys
21 male
61 female

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

type of sampling Hasset et al

A

Opportunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Type of experiment Hasset et al

A

Field experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Measures designed Hasset et al

A

independent measures design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How many toys Hasset et al (2)

A

6 ‘male’ toys - wheeled toys
7 ‘female’ toys - plushies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Results of Hasset et al (2)

A

males prefer male toys
female don’t really have preference - played with female toys more than males

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Strengths of Hasset et al + ethics (10)

A

Inter rater validity - 2 observers came to o consensus each time
Counterbalancing - placement of the toys changed each time
Behavioral categories clearly defined: sitting, dragging, sniffing etc.
standardized: trials/ time
Ethics:
Ethically taken care of
watched on cameras - no disturbance? controlled demand characteristics
Unethical to grow children away from society - did the experiment on monkeys

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How long did the trials last for? Hasset et al (2)

A

7 trials , 25 mins each

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Weakness of Hasset et al (2)

A

Methodological differences: hey did a study on children beforehand - study was conducted differently: different toys / children did individually while monkeys did in groups
—> hard to make it comparable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Conclusion of Hasset et al (2)

A

Females are more variable in their toy preferences
support biological explanation for toy preferences—> in absence of socialization as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Nature vs Nurture in Holzel et al (1)

A

the study showed that nurture through MBSR can affect structures and processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Sampling in Holzel et al (6)

A

opportunity sampling
University of massachusetts’s who already signed up for the MBSR course
16 experimental
17 control
aged 25 -55

22
Q

Measures designed Holzel et al

A

Independent measures design

23
Q

Procedure Holzel et al (4)

A

Completed questionnaire before & after the intervention
MRI scans before & after the intervention
Body scan, mindful yoga, meditation
Homework 45 min video

24
Q

Results of Holzel et al (4)

A

Grey matter density in the brain - hippocampus : positive change in the experimental group no change for control group
No significant correlation between time spent on body scans, yoga , mediation
Increased mindfulness scores

25
Q

Strengths of Holzel et al & ethics (7)

A

longitudinal study
—> high external validity
Standardization
—> fixed number of excersies - fixed duration —> highly replicable - high reliability
Ethics:
right to withdraw - 2 participants withdrew
made sure all were safe to do MRI scans

26
Q

Weakness of Holzel et al (4)

A

Low generalizability
—> already enrolled to MBSR
Lack of correlation with the homework
—> low internal validity

27
Q

Results of Andrade (2)

A

Control group recall - 7.1
Experimental group recall - 7.8

28
Q

Individual and Situational explanation of Andrade (2)

A

Individual - participants may have used a similar strategy before or have a personality turpentine that requires stimulation when processing information
SItuational - process of cooling could have caused the improvement in recall

29
Q

Strengths of Andrade (8)

A

Standardized procedure
—> easy to replicate —> reliability
—> likely to daydream as they could be bored and tired of the day —> thinking about going home
Operlationalised: doodling sheets —> reduced individual differences
Generalizability
—> 18 - 55 years
High ecological validity
—> real life —> classroom
Quantitative data — amount memorized

30
Q

Weaknesses of Andrade’s study (5)

A

Ceiling effect
—> test was easy should put more names
Participants were part of psychology panel —> may have suspected something —> demand characteristics
—> reduced validity
no measure of day dreaming

31
Q

Ethics in Andrade (3)

A
  1. debriefing well done
  2. Asking them to recall may have caused psychological harm
  3. deception
32
Q

Sample in Andrade (6)

A

Psychology Panel of a university
18 - 55
20 participants
10 in experimental
10 in control
asked to try after unrelated study for 5 mins

33
Q

Procedure in Andrade (6)

A

asked to stay after unrelated study for 5 mins
given A4 paper (controlled - lined , experiment - shapes to color in)
listened to 2.5 min recording 227 wpm
8 party attenders , 3 people , 1 cat , 8 places
after 1 minute (debriefed during this time - asked anyone suspected)
asked for names / places —> counterbalanced

34
Q

Baron - Cohen et al aim (2)

A

investigating theory of mind
—> ability to attribute ones mental states or another person, which is how we make sense of or predict another person’s behavior —> in other words —> ‘empathy’

35
Q

Strengths of Baron-Cohen (4)

A

High internal validity —> changes made to the eyes test —> 4 options, equal female and male pairs , glossary
Standardized - image same size, black and white , 1 correct answers —> 8 judges who decided on the emotions

36
Q

Weakness of Baron-Cohen (3) & ethics

A

Low ecological validity - not applicable to everyday life- we don’t look at just eyes
Low generalizability- ASD only 15
Ethics:
If they could not guess the emotion they may feel embarrassment —> psychological harm

37
Q

Sample of Baron-Cohen (3)

A

Opportunity — for 3 of the groups (adult - library users , students - cambridge university)
Random selected IQ
ASD - magazine volunteer sampling (15)

38
Q

Results of Baron-Cohen (3)

A

ASD group did significantly worse
normal adults inverse correlation to ones who have ASD
Women got higher scores than males - not that significant though

39
Q

Procedure of Baron-Cohen (2)

A

individually in room - everyone take AQ test
“then take the reading the mind in the eyes “ test

40
Q

Hypothesis of Pozzulo (4)

A
  1. Good as adults for cartoon (identification)
  2. worse than adults for cartoon target absent (rejection)
  3. worse than adults for human target
  4. worse than adults for human target absent (rejection)
41
Q

Experiment - Pozzulo

A

Lab

42
Q

Procedure of Pozzulo (5)

A

Human : 2 videos - 6 seconds
Cartoon : 2 videos - 6 seconds (dora & diego)
tested individually
filler questions asked before the line up
black silhouette box if target was absent

43
Q

Sampling of Pozzulo

A

59 children
4-7
Private schools - eastern ontario
53 adults
17-30
Psychology participant pool - eastern ontario
Both: opportunity sampling

44
Q

Measures design Pozzulo

A

independent

45
Q

Results of Pozzulo

A

All hypothesis proved correct

46
Q

Conclusion Pozzulo (2)

A

Errors in the target - absent lineup result from social factors not cognitive factors
—> for children

47
Q

Ethics Pozzulo (2)

A

Deception
children knew they had the right to withdraw
no psychological or physical harm was done

48
Q

Strengths Pozzulo (4)

A

High standardization along with controls
—> experiment with children and adults as identical as possible
quantitative data
—> objective

49
Q

Weakness of Pozzulo (4)

A

low ecological validity / mundane realism
—> no crime was actually done — emotional experience of genuine police line up’
Order effect
—> all the same order —> lead to demand characteristics

50
Q

Procedure of Bandura (3)

A

Child annoyed
taken to another room
if aggressive group - after a while they hit the Bobo doll —> verbal aggression “pow “
—> 10 minutes

51
Q

Results of Fagen

A

AS Psychology (15 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions