Exam 4: Final Exam Flashcards
Personality
An individual’s characteristic style of behaving, thinking, and feeling.
Studied through description, explanation, and quantitative measurement
Prior events
Events in the past that shaped personality
Anticipated events
Events that motivate a person to reveal personality characteristics
Self-report measurement
A method in which people provide subjective info about their own thoughts, feelings, or behaviors, typically via questionnaire or interview
- Ten-Item Personality Inventory
- MMPI-2-RF
Validity scales
Alleviate response style biases such as:
- attitude toward test taking
- tendency to distort answers
MMPI-2-RF
A well-researched clinical questionnaire to assess personality and psychological problems.
Self-descriptive statements answered by true/false/can’t say
Projective techniques
Designed to reveal inner aspects of individuals’ personalities by analysis of their responses to a standard series of ambiguous stimuli; generally seen as unreliable and don’t reveal valid info or predictions
Rorschach Inkblot Test
Individual interpretations of the meaning of a set of unstructured inkblots are analyzed to identify inner feelings and interpret personality structure
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
Respondents reveal underlying motives, concerns, and the way they see the social world through stories about ambiguous pictures of people
Automated behavior identification
Allows for removal of human influence.
For example: the EAR (electronically activated recorder) sampled hundreds of participants and found that women and men are equally talkative
Social media analysis
For example: 700 million words and phrases posted on FaceBook by 75,000 people were compared to results of personality tests of the same people; revealed certain trends
Examples of utilizing technology to measure personality?
- Automated behavior identification
- Natural Language Processing
- Social media analysis
Psychological constructs and problems measured through the MMPI-2-RF
- clinical
- somatic
- internalizing
- externalizing
- interpersonal
The Trait Approach
Categorizes differences among individuals through description, not explanation
Trait
A relatively stable disposition to behave in a particular and consistent way; limited by the infinite adjectives that can be used to describe traits
How can traits be used to explain behavior?
- The trait is a preexisting disposition that causes behavior; these are found through inventories
- The trait is a motivation that guides behavior; these are found through projective tests
Core traits
Adjectives that describe personality; can be organized in a hierarchical pattern through factor analysis
Factor analysis
Sorts trait terms or self-descriptions into a small number of underlying dimensions; researchers argue about how many core factors exist
Big Five (five-factor analysis)
- openness to experience
- conscientiousness
- extraversion
- agreeableness
- neuroticism
Openness to experience
imaginative vs. down to earth
variety vs. routine
independent vs. conforming
Conscientiousness
organized vs. disorganized
careful vs. careless
self-disciplined vs. weak-willed
Extraversion
social vs. retiring
fun-loving vs. sober
affectionate vs. reserved
Agreeableness
softhearted vs. ruthless
trusting vs. suspicious
helpful vs. uncooperative
Neuroticism
worried vs. calm
insecure vs. secure
self-pitying vs. self-satisfied
What can cause changes in personality?
- brain damage
- brain pathologies
- pharmaceutical treatment
- mind-altering drugs
How do genetics contribute to behavior?
- heritability of personality is about 40%
- heritability of Big Five range from 31% to 41%
- conservatism vs. liberalism linked to chromosomes associated with mental flexibility
How does gender impact personality?
Gender differences increase over time, suggesting cultural influence
- boys show more external emotion and anger; men then become physically aggressive, assertive, and confident
- girls show more internal emotion, sadness, and anxiety; women become more verbal, nurturing, and insecure
Social Role Theory
Personality differences between women and men arise from cultural standards and expectations
Bem Sex Role Inventory
Participants rate themselves on items that are either “masculine” or “feminine” without seeing gender association; revealed that psychological androgyny has positive associations including less depression
Neurophysiological associations of extraversion vs. introversion
extraversion: reticular formation not as easily stimulated, so they seek more mental stimulation
introversion: cortex more easily stimulated and overwhelmed
Behavioral activation system (BAS)
“Go” system; activates approach behavior in response to anticipation of reward, more reactive in extraverts
Behavioral inhibition system (BIS)
“Stop” system; inhibits behavior in response to stimuli signaling punishment, more reactive in introverts
Psychodynamic approach
Regards personality as formed by needs, strivings, and desires largely operating outside of awareness; motives can produce emotional disorders
Defense mechanisms
Unconscious coping mechanisms that reduce anxiety generated by threats from unacceptable impulses
Rationalization
Supplying a reasonable-sounding explanation for unacceptable feelings and behaviors to conceal one’s underlying motives or feelings
Repression
Removing painful experiences, sources of anxiety, and unacceptable impulses from the conscious mind
Denial
Refusing to acknowledge the source of anxiety
Reaction formation
Unconsciously replacing threatening inner wishes and fantasies with an exaggerated version of their opposite
Projection
Attributing one’s own threatening feelings, motives, or impulses to another person or group
Regression
Ego deals with internal conflict and perceived threat by reverting to immature behavior or earlier stage of development
Displacement
Shifting unacceptable wishes or drives to a neutral or less threatening alternative
Identification
Helps deal with feelings of threat and anxiety by enabling us to unconsciously take on the characteristics of another person who seems more powerful or able to cope
Sublimation
Channeling unacceptable sexual or aggressive drives into socially acceptable and culturally enhancing activities
Humanistic-Existential Approach
Combines humanistic psychology and existential psychology; says that humans make healthy choices that create their personalities
Humanistic psychology
Emphasizes positive, optimistic view of human nature, goodness, and potential for growth
Existential psychology
Emphasizes the individual as a responsible agent, free to create their life while negotiating the issue of meaning and the reality of death
Self-actualization tendency
The human motive toward realizing our inner potential through the pursuit of knowledge, expression of creativity, desire to give to society, etc.
Flow experience
Caused by engagement in tasks that match our abilities and don’t challenge us too excessively. This reflects our realization of potential and height of personality development
Existential approach
A school of thought that regards personality as governed by an individual’s ongoing choices and decisions in the context of the realities of life and death.
Argues that we should deal with issues directly instead of using defenses and accept the pain of existence
Angst
The anxiety of full being
- why am I here?
- what is the meaning of life?
Social-cognitive approach
Views personality in terms of how a person thinks about the situations encountered in daily life and behaves in response to them; emphasizes perception of environment
Person-situation controversy
The question of whether behavior is caused more by personality or by situational factors, in contrast to the basic idea that personality characteristics cause people to behave in the same way across situations and over time
Outcome expectancies
Goals and expectations that lead to a characteristic style of behavior fuel a person’s assumptions about the likely consequences of a future behavior
Locus of control
A person’s tendency to perceive the control of rewards as internal to the self or external in the environment; measures how much control we believe we have
Personal constructs
Dimensions people use in making sense of their experiences. Therefore, we see the social world from different perspectives that lead us to behave in different ways based on how we perceive those behaviors
Self-recognition
We can recognize ourselves in the mirror by 18 months, which enables reflexive thinking and leads to self-concept and self-esteem
Self-concept
What we think about ourselves; our explicit knowledge of our own behaviors, traits, and other personal characteristics; developed from social experiences and impacts behavior throughout life
“I” vs. “Me”
“I” is a perspective of all personal experiences such as thoughts, acts, etc.
“Me” is the self that is known as an object in the world and can be described by physical characteristics, activities, personality traits, social roles, etc.
Autobiographical memory
Knowledge of self, organized into self-narrative and self-schema, which don’t always align
Self-narrative
A story we tell about ourselves
Self-schema
Sets of traits we use to define ourselves
Sense of self
Largely constructed through relationships with others and feedback
Self-verification
Tendency to seek evidence to confirm the self-concept
Self-esteem
The extent to which an individual likes, values, and accepts the self; arises from comparison with others, and being valued and accepted by others
- Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
Self-serving bias
People’s tendency to take credit for their successes but downplay responsibility for their failures
Narcissism
A grandiose view of the self, combined with a tendency to seek admiration from and exploit others
Implicit egotism
Argues that people are generally unaware of their preference for things similar to themselves
Self-compassion
Correlated with self-esteem; predicts reactions when confronted with failure and hardship, and is protective in the face of social rejection
Three forms of self-compassion
isolation vs. common humanity
self-judgment vs. self-kindness
over-identification vs. mindfulness
Social psychology
The study of the causes and consequences of sociality, including the effects of social variables on individual behavior, attitudes, perceptions, and motives
Social role
Social-defined pattern of behavior
Rules
Behavioral guidelines
Social norms
Expectation a group has for its members
Social cognition
Process by which people select, interpret, and categorize the behaviors of others
Social perception
Process by which people come to understand and categorize the behaviors of others
Attribution theory
Describes the ways the social perceiver uses information to generate causal explanations
Covariation model
Claims we rely on consistency, distinctiveness, and consensus when making attributions
Situational attribution
Low consistency, high consensus, high distinctiveness
Dispositional attribution
High consistency, low consensus, low distinctiveness
Consistency
Does the person perform this action regularly?
Consensus
Do most people perform this action?
Distinctiveness
Does the person perform similar actions?
Correspondence bias
Tendency to make a dispositional attribution when a person’s behavior was caused by the situation
Actor-observer effect
Tendency to make situational attributions for our own behaviors while making dispositional attributions for the identical behaviors of others
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Prediction modifies interactions so as to produce what is expected
Behavioral confirmation
People behave in ways that elicit specific expected reactions and then use those reactions to confirm their beliefs
Aggression
Intentional behavior whose purpose is to harm another person where the victim wants to avoid harm
Frustration-aggression hypothesis
Animals aggress when their goals are frustrated/obstructed
Proactive aggression
Aggression that is planned and purposeful
Reactive aggression
Aggression that occurs spontaneously in response to a negative affective state
How do different genders aggress differently?
- due to aggression fueled by testosterone, men are responsible for the large majority of violent crime
- women commit more relational and indirect aggression
Cooperation
Behavior by two or more individuals that can lead to mutual benefit, but can be risky
Explain the Prisoner’s Dilemma
You and Tucker are being questioned for a crime in two separate rooms. If you both refuse to sign the document, then you both serve 1 year. If you refuse to sign but Tucker does sign, then he goes free and you serve 3 years. However, if you sign and Tucker doesn’t, then you go free and Tucker serves 3 years. But if you sign and Tucker signs, then you both serve 2 years. How do you know what to do?
Group
A collection of people who have something in common that distinguishes them from others
Prejudice
An evaluation of another person based solely on their group membership
In-group favoritism
Being positively prejudiced toward members of your own group
What four factors are present in group decision-making?
- not fully capitalizing on individual expertise
- common-knowledge effect
- group polarization
- groupthink
Common-knowledge effect
The tendency for group discussions to focus on info that all members share
Group polarization
The tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than any member would have made alone
Groupthink
The tendency for groups to filter out undesirable input and reach consensus in order to facilitate interpersonal harmony
Deindividuation
When immersion in a group causes people to become less concerned with their personal values, which leads to groups acting poorly when together and doing things they would never do alone
Diffusion of responsibility
The tendency of individuals to feel diminished responsibility for their actions when they are surrounded by others who are acting in the same way
Social loafing
Tendency of people to expend less effort when they are in a group than when alone
Bystander intervention effect
When the act of helping strangers in an emergency situation is greatly diminished by diffusion of responsibility when others are nearby
Prosocial behavior
The tendency to help others
Altruism
Intentional behavior that benefits another at a potential cost to oneself and with no reward
Inclusive fitness
The process by which evolution selects individuals who cooperate with their relatives for the benefits of passing genes rather than individual survival
Reciprocal altruism
Behavior that benefits another with the expectation that those benefits will be returned in the future
Attraction
A feeling of preference caused by situational, physical, and psychological factors; facilitated by proximity
The “Love Bridge” experiment
Physiological arousal can be misinterpreted as attraction
Mere exposure effect
Tendency for linking of a stimulus to increase with the frequency of exposure to that stimulus
How does gender impact mate selectivity?
- women are more selective about sex because of the potential cost
- all genders are choosier and more cautious when approached, but less picky when approaching
Homophily
The tendency for people to like others who are similar to themselves
Love
Strong affection for another person due to kinship, personal ties, sexual attraction, admiration, common interests, etc.
Sternberg’s Three Components of Love
Intimacy, commitment, and passion
Empty love
Love with just commitment
Companionate love
Love with commitment and intimacy; an experience involving affection, trust, and concern for a partner’s well-being
Friendship love/liking
Love with just intimacy
Romantic love
Love with intimacy and passion
Infatuated love
Love with just passion; an experience involving feelings of euphoria, intimacy, and intense sexual attraction
Fatuous love
Love with passion and commitment
Consummate love
Love with commitment, intimacy, and passion; the most complete and fulfilling type of love