exam 4 Flashcards

1
Q

within subjects design (paired/repeated measures)

A

the same participant gets all the treatments that everyone else got

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

advantages to within subjects design

A

-eliminates worry about individual differences because you have the same people being studied twice
-requires fewer participants
-each subjects is their own control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

which is more powerful - within subjects or between

A

within subjects design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

order effects

A

performance in one condition is influenced by participation in another condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

carry over effect

A

lingering after effects of one of the earlier treatment conditions
-specifc treatment condition produces a lasting change in the participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

progressive error

A

changes in behavior that are related to experience in the project (but not to one specific condition)
-fatigue, practice, retro memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

order effects as confounds

A

if all subjects relieve the treatment conditions in the same order, then order effects can potentially be a confounding variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

counterbalancing

A

distributes the order effects across the treatments evenly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

complete counter balancing

A

subjects are run in all possible sequences of treatments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

partial counter balancing

A

s a way of ordering the presentation of levels of the independent variable to minimize some of the effects of sequential confounding variables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

latin square

A

design that helps to control for sequencing effects in within-subjects designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

contrast effects

A

wondering if being exposed to all levels of the independent variable changed behavior in one or more conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

oppenihiemer

A

-belief in a just and orderly world
-compared dutch children and adults
-belief decreases w age and more w social inequality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

langer and rodin

A

two groups of elderly people on different floors
a. responsible group
b. no responsibility group
— found that group a was happier, more alert and lived longer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

quasi experiment

A

a design that is like an experimental design but lacks the key ingredient of random assignment to groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

quasi experiment lack

A

-random assignment (between subject)
-counter balancing (within subjects)
-IV cant be manipulated
-has some protection against validity threats

17
Q

non experimental

A

research design not having protection from the threats to internal validity provided by experimental or quasi-experimental designs.

18
Q

between subjects

A

subject grouped together by factors other than random assignment and then given different treatments

19
Q

between subjects concern

A

lack of random assignment

20
Q

differential research design

A

comparing pre existing groups defined by some participant variable
-no manipulation of IV or random assignment to groups

21
Q

postest only non equivalent control design

A

experimenter administers treatment to one pre-existing , not to the other
-problem: its measured after treatment

22
Q

pretest -postest non equivalent control group design

A

both groups are measured before the treatment as well as after
-protects against possibility that groups were different to begin with

23
Q

pre-post

A

one group is observed before and after a treatment is put into place
-no counter balancing
-might be used if a treatment is permanent or long lasting

24
Q

one group pretest postest design

A

consists of measure, treatment, measure

25
time series design
multiple measurements before and after treatment -useful if treatment takes a while to start working
26
interrupted time series design
determining effect of a naturally occuring event (cant control) in a time series -ptsd and catastrophe
27
second hand smoke of montana
smoking ban and then the ban got taken away -interrupted time series design
28
developmental research
no manipulation/ random assignment
29
developmental research
no manipulation/ random assignment
30
cross sectional design
people of different ages (cohorts) examined at the same time strength = short term weakness - cohort effects - differences may be due to different in histories
31
longitudinal
testing the same group over time strength - avoid cohorts weakness - long term, attrition and or mortality
32
rodman and berger one factor
2 levels of IV or quasi IV
33
factorial design
an experimental design containing more than one independent variable in which every level of each independent variable is combined with every other level