Exam 3- Week 5 Flashcards
Sociocultural (or sociohistorical) theory
The interpersonal process of developing skills
Development- changes over time in how children participate in culture
Focus on formal (schools, rituals, traditions) and informal (authentic activities) ways that culture is transmitted to children
3 aspects of this theory
- Culture mediated higher psychological functioning through sings and tools
- Sensation (startle response)
- Cultural tools and symbols (label from language; use to understand sensation)
- Mediated direct experience of world, and the way we understand them
- Knowledge
- Social and cultural experience guide and support how we learn about and use these signs and tools
- Give us labels for items
- Can be subtle or explicit (schooling)
- Tell us what is important in the situation (“don’t play with your food”)
- Process unfolds over human development (takes a long time)
Lev S. Vygotsky
During communist revolution (Marxist)
- goals of labor need to match personal goals, to connect
Marxist type theory of development
- cultural transmission
- grand cultural theory
Fossilized intelligence
What they can do now
Methods of cultural transmission
Zones of proximal development (Vygotsky)
Guided participation (Rogoff)
Intent community participation
Zones of proximal development (Vygotsky)
More sophisticated as more outward
Example: counting
- Interrupt; continue
- Count on (continue from where stopped), can be basic addition
- Count up (start over)
- Leading
Different lesson for each to continue development
Target instruction properly and accurately to zone; sensitivity to learning
Distance between what a child can do on own and what they can do with the help of an experience partent (scaffold, removed once gain confidence)
-> move to higher levels of achievement
Origin of intelligence is social
Guided participation (Rogoff)
Informal
Learning alongside cultural members while participating in everyday activities
Intent community participation
Tools, symbols, and practices of culture
Child survival and infancy
Child mortality
- lower rates: vaccination and mother feeding
Males: young adult, risk taking
Women: young adult, child birth
Child rearing goals
Conditioned by needs of people in culture
Three level higherarchy of parent child rearing goals
- Concerned with child’s survival and health
- Preparing child to maintain themselves economically in maturity
- Focus on child’s potential to maximize other cultural values (1 & 2 must be secure)- western culture focus here
- Education
- Socioeconomic status
- Happiness
Child attachment/ Attachment theory
Emotional (a need) bond between caregiver and child; critical to survival
Attachment thoery
- Secure base of exploration and sense of trust (if cry, mom will come)
- Intensified if biological relationship
- Trust based on Freudian view
Monotropic view of attachment
One location; favoring biological mother
Rooted in Freudian ideas and ethology
- Ability to trust absolutely essential to healthy development
- Custodial care- food, shelter, water
- With only this, didn’t do well psychologically -> self stimulating behavior (self rocking)
Harlow’s research (contact conform)
- Wire mom monkey: prefered confort to nourishment
Crying babies cry less if attended to right away, which is the opposite of what learning theory would predict
- If needs you, and tells you, you will be there (trust), so only cry when need you
Mary Ainsworth
Studied individual differences
Strange situation procedure (mother leaves baby with stranger -> reunion)
- 60% secure
- Seek contact during reunion, then go on to play
- 30% insecure aviodant
- Look at mother, but don’t go to during reunion (daycare)
- OR just will NOT look at mom
- 5-10% insecure ambivilant-resistant
- Seek contact, when mom tries to respond, baby kicks, etc.
- 5% disorganized
- Worse version of avoidant/ ambivilan-resistant
Cultural perspective (Keller)
Attachment theory
- Based on western views
- Such families are in less than 5% of the world’s population
- Evolutionary adaptation views
- Focus on variability in early caregiving and how it favors patterns with the best outcomes for survival of individual and group
- Variation in western societies
- Germany
- Higher rates of avoidant behavior (daycare)
- Japan
- Same rate of security, but no avoidant, just resistance (very close contact of mom and baby: why would mom leave at al?! Confusion)
- Israel
- Similar to Japan
- Germany
Variation in infant care (Morielli, 1992)
Cultural variation in infant’s sleeping (lower SIDS when sleep with a partner)
Mayan vs. US household
- Practices
- Relation to developmental goals for children
- Theoretical criticism
- Western ideologies underlie attachment
- Importance of autonomy
- Self separate from others (self expression)
- Lead to certain caregiving practices
- Single caregiver- biological mother
- Role:
- Encourage independence
- Direct and control child’s behavior (and build into system)
- Alternative cultural views
- Multiple caregiving arrangements
- Cooperative breeding arrangement
- Frees up mother’s time (take care of others) it takes her place if she is lost
- Extended kin system important here (survival based)
- Efe, Zaire, etc.
- Stanger anxiety, universal? NO
- Western: baby faces mother a lot of the time
- Unknown in societies where strangers are welcome and treated in a friendly way
- Attachment: a cultural perspective
- Early emotional bond is important
- Helps us develop sense of self
- In western cultures, self is a separate individual
- In non-western cultures, self is a member of a social group
- Different responsibilities
- How to study attachment with culture at the center
- Shift from a dyadic to a more networked approach/ view
- See enthnotheories of caring for babies as a community responsibility
- Redefines development from child- and self-centered to community centered (as socially centered, not child chentered)
- Trust becomes an element of the community at large, not jst of the dyadic parent-child relationship
- Western ideologies underlie attachment
- Theoretical criticism
What is a family (Georgas)
The most immediate experience of culture; a social group
Structure
- Members
- Types of families
- 2 gen.
- 3 gen.
- Stem- includes birthright child (main branch)
- Joint- all children (even married, and their children)
- Fully extended- aunts, uncles, cousins, nephews, etc.
- Types of families
- Roles
- Lineage
- Authority
Function (to help next generation grow up and function)
- To help young members meet physical, emotional, and social needs
- Sustained relationship
Kinship relationships
- Lineage- how resources of family are continued
- Lineal- parents to children
- Collateral- relationships with aunts and uncles (ex. mother’s brother as disciplinarian)
- Affinal- in laws (mother in-laws)
- Residence (patrilocal, matrilocal, neolocal)
- Marital patterns
- Endogamy (within social group) and exogamy
- Rules or arranged marriages to keep endogamy not really necessary today
- Inheritance
- Land rights
Origin of family types
- Ecology and subsistence
- Argicultural families have many kids
- Historical, political and legan aspects
- Rules (birthright, adoption, etc.)
- Community patterns and practices
- Religion is centrally involved