Exam 3 (Chapters 8-10) Flashcards

(104 cards)

1
Q

Define Conformity

A

a change in one’s behavior due to the real or imagined influence of
other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Examples or Conformity

A

-You’re in the hall, waiting to get into your classroom when you hear the fire
alarm ring. You look around at the other people in the hall. They all start hurrying to the exits, so you do the same.
-You plan to study for your upcoming quiz tonight, but your friends text you to
grab dinner and hang out. You don’t want them to be annoyed at you if decline them again, so you decide to join them.
-You’re taking a quiz when you’re stumped on one question. You could cheat
and peak at your notes, but then you think about how disappointed your parents would be if they knew you cheated, so choose not to.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two types of influence?

A

-Informational social influence
-Normative social influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Informational Social Influence

A

-relying on other people as a source of information to guide our behavior

(We conform because we believe that others’ interpretation of an ambiguous
situation is more correct than our own and can help us choose an appropriate course of action)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Example of Informational Social Influence

A

If there is a potential hurricane, we talk to family/friends/others to see
what they plan to do, who is evacuating or not, how they were preparing, etc.
and follow their lead. We also pay attention to the news, meteorologists, and
other experts because we assume they know what they are talking about.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What occurred during Sherif’s experiment?

A

-Had participants estimate how far a dot of light had moved
-Participants were then placed in a group together and had to state outloud their estimates
-Results:
-Over several trials of voicing their estimates, their estimates converged to a
common estimate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the conclusion on Sherif’s experiment?

A

People used each other as a source of information bc they thought others would know more than them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define Private acceptance

A

conforming to other people’s behavior out of a genuine belief that what they are doing or saying is right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When will people conform?

A
  1. When the situation is ambiguous
  2. When the situation is a crisis
  3. When there are experts present
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What happens when the situation is ambiguous?

A

When you don’t know what’s going on, it’s natural to look to others for some
guidance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

example of when a situation is ambiguous

A

Take the hurricane example again. We don’t know how dangerous it
will be, where exactly it will make landfall, whether or not we’ll lose
power, etc. Because of all these uncertainties, we tend to seek
information from others to help us decide how to act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What bout when their is an expert present?

A

The more expertise or knowledge a person has, the more valuable we
see them as a source of information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Example of when their is an expert present?

A

When there is a risk of a hurricane, many of us watch/read the news
and listen to meteorologists and emergency response teams. Because
we see them as experts, we assume they know what they are talking
about, and we’re more likely to follow their guidance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define social norms

A

the implicit or explicit rules a group has for the acceptable behaviors,
values, and beliefs of its members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define Normative social Influence

A

-going along with what other people so in order to be liked and
accepted by them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is an example of Normative social influence?

A

You don’t want to go to a party, but you do it anyway because you don’t want your friends to be mad at you.
( We publicly conform with the group’s beliefs and behaviors but do not always privately accept them)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Normative social influence results in ______

A

Public Compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Define Public Complance

A

-conforming to other people’s behavior publicly without necessarily
believing in what they are doing or saying (You don’t necessarily agree with the behavior but you do it anyway)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What occurred in Asch’s line-judgement?

A

-Put the participant into a
group of 8 (1 participant; 7
confederates)
-Presented the group with a
line and asked them to match
that line to one of three
choices
-There was clearly a correct
answer
- All confederates gave the wrong answer and then the participant would
have to give his choice last

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What were the results on Asch’s line-judgement?

A

◦Many people conformed
even though the group’s answer was clearly wrong
◦76% of the participants
conformed on at least one trial
◦On average, people
conformed on about 1/3 of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Why did poeple conform during Asch’s line study?

A

people conformed because of normative social influence
◦The fear of being the lone dissenter was so strong that people conformed, at
least some of the time ◦People knew they were giving the wrong answer but did it anyway to not go
against the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What happened in Asch’s line variation study?

A

-In this study, confederates gave the wrong answer, same as in the
original study
-However, in this variation, Asch had the participant write his answer on
the piece of paper instead of saying it out loud
◦The participant did not have to worry about what the other group members thought of him because they would never find out what his answers were
Results:
◦Conformity dropped considerably
◦Ps conformed only 1.5 times of the 12 trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Social Impact Theory

A

conforming to social influence depends on the group’s:
◦Importance
◦Immediacy
◦Number of member

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Social Impact Theory (strength/importance)

A

how important the group is to you
◦The stronger the group (or the more important the group is to you) the
more likely you’ll conform to normative pressures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Example of a strong social impact theory
It makes sense that you’d probably feel more pressure to conform if it’s your family or close friends (very strong) than a classmate that you don’t know very well (not strong)
26
Define Idiosyncrasy credits
the tolerance a person earns, over time, by conforming to group norms; if enough idiosyncrasy credits are earned, the person can, on occasion, deviate from the group without retribution
27
example of idiosyncrasy
You don’t really like going to the movies. However, your best friends love it, so you usually go with them when they ask you to a movie. Let’s say they want to watch a movie this weekend, and you really don’t want to. So you decline to go and ask if y’all can do something else. Because they know you’re not into movies but go anyway for them, they’re not mad at you this time for going against them.
28
Social Impact theory (Immediacy)
◦How close the group is physically during the attempt to influence you ◦The more physically close the group, the more likely you’ll conform
29
Example of immediacy in social impact theory\
◦How close the group is physically during the attempt to influence you ◦The more physically close the group  the more likely you’ll conform
30
Social Impact theory (number)
How many people are in the group ◦The more people in the group  the more likely you’ll conform ◦BUT only up to a certain point ◦Optimal group sizes for conformity is between 3 -5 ◦After 5 people, adding anymore to the group will not increase the likelihood of conformity ◦It does not take a large group to make you conform
31
When else will people conform?
-When there are no allies in the group -When the group’s culture is collectivistic
32
Define injunctive norms
-people’s perceptions of what behaviors are approved or disapproved of by others -What are people supposed to do
33
Example of injunctive norms
people are supposed to slow down at a yellow light; people are supposed to recycle
34
Define descriptive norms
-people’s perceptions of how people actually behave in given situation, regardless of whether the behavior is approved or disapproved of by others ◦What people actually do
35
Example of descriptive norms
most speed up when they see a yellow light; people throw away a lot of recyclable items
36
Reno, Cialdini, & Kallgren (1993) study
Three conditions ◦Descriptive norm condition ◦ Confederate walked by the P and dropped an empty fast-food restaurant bag on the ground ◦ By littering, the confederate was subtly communicating that “this is what people do in this situation” ◦Injunctive norm condition ◦ Confederate picked up a littered bag from the ground before passing the P ◦ By picking up someone else’s litter, the confederate was subtly communicating that “littering is wrong” ◦Control condition ◦ Confederate walked by the P and didn’t do anything In addition, they conducted this study in one of two environments ◦The parking lot was heavily littered ◦ Communicated that “littering is what most people do here” ◦The area was clean and unlittered ◦ Communicated “littering is not what people do here”
37
Reno, Cialdini, & Kallgren (1993) study - Results
Control condition ◦Almost 40% of the participants threw the flyer on the ground, regardless if the area was littered or clean Descriptive norm condition ◦Littering was reduced more in the clean area (11% of participants littered) than in the littered area (30% littered) Injunctive norm condition ◦Lowest amount of littering compared to all other conditions ◦About 7% littered in the clean and 4% in the littered area
38
Define obedience
a change in one’s behavior due to the direct influence of an authority figure
39
Example of obedience
Listening to your parents, following a teacher’s instructions, completing the work your boss tells you to do
40
Consequences of obedience
◦People will obey an authority figure to hurt or even kill other human beings ◦Ex: My Lai massacre, Holocaust, genocide
41
Milgram’s (1963) study:
A participant and confederate were told that the study was investigating the effects of punishment on learning accomplice to the researcher. ◦Participant is always the “teacher” ◦Confederate always the “learner” ◦Remember, a confederate is someone who is “in” on the study. They’re an ◦Milgram, as the experimenter, is perceived as the authority figure
42
Milgram’s (1963) study: Results
Most of Milgram’s participants succumbed to the pressure of the authority figure (the experimenter) The average maximum shock administered was 360-volts 62.5% of the participants went all the way to 450-volts ( fully compliant) 80% of the participants continued giving shocks after the learner complained of his heart condition, which he had mentioned at the beginning of the experiment
43
Why did participants obey?
The role of normative social influence ◦If someone really wants us to do something, it can be difficult to say no, especially when it’s an authority figure ◦You don’t want the person of authority to be disappointed, hurt, or even angry ◦So when an authority figure is so insistent that we obey, saying no can be very difficult Variation of Milgram’s study ◦Two confederates working with P ◦ One confederate read the list of word pairs ◦ The other confederate told the learner if he was right or wrong ◦ P was in charge of shocking the learner ◦Results ◦ Only 10% of the participants were fully compliant
44
Define group
two or more people who interact and are interdependent in the sense that their needs and goals cause them to influence each other
45
Examples of groups
two or more people who interact and are interdependent in the sense that their needs and goals cause them to influence each other
46
Why do people join groups?
To help us accomplish things that would be difficult to do on our own ◦Ex: think about your job – it would be impossible to do everything on your own To fulfill a need of belongingness ◦Have an innate need to belong to groups (feel like we’re part of something To help us define who we are ◦Use other people as important sources of information ◦Groups can impact how we see the world ◦Groups become an important part of our identity ◦Groups help us establish social norms
47
Define Group Cohesiveness
-qualities of a group that bind members together and promote liking between them ◦The more cohesive a group is, the more its members are likely to stay in the group, take part in group activities, and try to recruit new like-minded members
48
Group similarity
◦Members tend to be alike in age, sex, beliefs, and opinions ◦This happens because people are attracted to others who are similar to them
49
Define social norms
acceptable behaviors and beliefs that groups members are supposed to follow
50
Define social roles
shared expectations in a group about how particular people are supposed to behave
51
Define Social Facilitation
when people are in the presence of others and their individual performance can be evaluated, they tend to do better on simple tasks and worse on complex tasks
52
Simple vs complex tasks
◦Simple task – something you can easily do ◦Usually something well-learn and maybe even automatic (second nature) ◦Ex: writing your name; riding a bike ◦Complex task – more difficult ◦Usually requires more cognitive energy and might involve something newer or something you don’t have a lot of experience doing ◦Ex: solving a difficult math problem
53
Define Social Loafing
when people are in the presence of others and their individual performance cannot be evaluated, they tend to do worse on simple or unimportant tasks but better on complex tasks
54
Define Deindividuation
-the loosening of normal constraints on behavior when people can’t be identified (such as when they are in a crowd) ◦Getting lost in the crowd can lead to people engaging in impulsive, deviant, and sometimes violent acts ◦“Mob mentality” – riots, fights, destruction of property, looting
55
Why does deindividuation occur?
Makes people feel less accountable ◦Anonymity makes it difficult to tell one person from another ◦Reduces the likelihood that any individual will be singled out and blamed ◦Since you feel like you won’t be held accountable for your actions, you’re more likely to do something you normally wouldn’t Increases obedience to group norms ◦It’s possible to have group norms that can sometimes conflict with other group norms or even societal norms in general ◦When faced with conflicting norms, people will usually follow the one that is most immediate (closest to you at that time) ◦If your group is engaging in deviant behavior (current group norm), it’s easy to get swept up in that group norm and follow it
56
What was the Stanford Prison Study
Zimbardo wanted to look at the power of social roles Social roles ◦Prisoner ◦Guard (Ps were randomly assigned to be a prisoner or a guard) ◦Prison warden (Zimbardo) The two groups were outfitted with different uniforms ◦Prisoners: dressed in loose-fitting smocks with identification numbers on it, rubber sandals (flip flops), and stocking cap (beanie), and the locked chain attached to one ankle ◦Guards: dressed in khaki shirts and pants, a whistle, a police nightstick, and big reflective sunglasses that covered half their face
57
What happened during the Stanford Prison study?
The participants assumed their roles of guards and prisoners very quickly and to such an extent that continuing the study would have been unethical and immoral ◦Many of the guards became incredibly abusive and cruel ◦Thought of creative ways of verbally harass and humiliate the prisoners ◦The prisoners became passive, helpless, and withdrawn ◦Some became so anxious and depressed that they had to be released from the study earlier than the others
58
Define Process Loss?
any aspect of group interaction that inhibits good problem solving
59
Define Groupthink
a kind of decision process in which maintaining group cohesiveness and solidarity is more important than considering the facts in a realistic manner
60
Avoiding groupthink
-remain partial -seek outside opinion -create subgroups -seek anonymous opinions
61
Define Group Polarization
the tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclinations of its members
62
Example group polarization
individuals think that chess players shouldn’t make a risky move unless there’s at least a 30% chance of success, but when they discuss it with group members, it drops to just 10% - shows that they moved in a more extreme direction when in a group
63
Define Contingency Theory of Leadership
the idea that the effectiveness of a leadership depends both on (1) how task-oriented or relationship-oriented the leader is and (2) the amount of control the leader has over the group
64
Define TASK-ORIENTED LEADER
more concerned with getting the job done than with group members’ feelings and relationships
65
RELATIONSHIP-ORIENTED LEADER
more concerned with group members’ feelings and relationships
66
High-control
leader has excellent relationships with group members, his/her position as leader is clearly perceived as powerful, and the work needing to be done by the group is structured and well-defined
67
Low-Control
the leader has poor relationships with group members, and the work needing to be done is not clearly well-defined
68
CAUSES OF ATTRACTION
Propinquity Similarity Reciprocal liking Physical attractiveness
69
Define the PROPINQUITY EFFECT
the more we see and interact with people, the more likely they are to become our friends
70
Define Mere Exposure
the more exposure we have to a stimulus, the more likely we are to like it
71
Define Similarity
a match between you and another person
72
Define reciprocal liking
People who like each other get to know each other better and become more familiar with each other
73
Define Attractiveness
Attractive people seem more familiar to us, and we like them more
74
Define Companionate love
DEF: the intimacy and affection we have for someone that are not accompanied by passion or physiological arousal
75
Example of Companionate Love
close friendships, family relationships
76
Define Passionate Love
an intense longing we feel for a person, accompanied by physiological arousal
77
Example of passionate love
Romantic relationships
78
Define Ster berg’s Theory of love
the idea that different kinds of love consist of varying degrees of three components (intimacy, passion, commitment)
79
Intimacy
Feelings of being close to and bonded with a partner
80
Passion
-The arousal you experience toward your partner -Includes sexual attraction
81
Commitment
-Short-term: that you love your partner -Long-term: to maintain that love and stay with your partner
82
SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY (SHORT-TERM)
the idea that people’s feelings about a relationship depend on (a) their perceptions of the rewards and costs of the relationship (b) the kind of relationship they deserve, and (c) their chances for having a better relationship with someone else
83
Rewards
Anything positive that you get out of being in that relationship
84
Example of rewards
validation, companionship, support, entertainment, gaining access to money, status, activities, and other interesting people
85
Costs
Anything negative that you have to deal with in that relationship
86
Examples of cost
putting up with annoying habits and characteristics of the other person, stress (from fights or disagreements)
87
Define comparison level
people’s expectations about the level of rewards and costs they are likely to receive in a particular relationship
88
Comparison levels
 High comparison level (high expectations)  Expect a lot of rewards and few costs  If a relationship doesn’t match this comparison level, you will be unhappy and unsatisfied  Low comparison level (low expectations)  Expect a lot of costs and few rewards  You would be happy in an okay relationship because you expect relationships to be difficult and
89
long-term relationships, you have to consider a person’s level of investment in the relationship
anything you put in to a relationship that you will lose if you leave the relationship
90
investments
Tangible things – financial resources and possessions (i.e., house) Intangible things – emotional energy and time spent building the relationshi
91
INVESTMENT THEORY (LONG-TERM SOCIAL EXCHANGE)
the theory that people’s commitment to a relationship depends not only on their satisfaction with the relationship but also on how much they have invested in the relationship that would be lost by ending it
92
Define Equity Theory
the idea that people are happiest with relationships in which the rewards and costs experienced and the contributions made by both parties are roughly equal
93
Equitable relationships
Partners are pretty much equal in the rewards/costs they experience and the amount of time/effort they are putting into the relationship Doesn’t matter if rewards are higher or costs are higher – just needs to be similar Most stable relationships
94
Inequitable relationships
Under-benefitted  One partner gets few rewards, incurs more costs, and has to devote more time/energy to the relationship  Least satisfying relationship Over-benefitted  The other partner gets lots of rewards, incurs few costs, and devotes little time/energy to the relationship  Less satisfying relationship, but not as bad as under-benefitted
95
EXCHANGE RELATIONSHIPS
relationships governed by the need for equity (i.e., for an equal ratio of rewards and costs)
96
COMMUNAL RELATIONSHIPS
relationships in which people’s primary concern is being responsive to the other person’s needs
97
Destructive behaviors – harm the relationship
Actively harming the relationship (e.g., abusing the partner, threatening to break up, actually leaving) Passively allowing the relationship to deteriorate (e.g., refusing to deal with problems, ignoring the problem, spending less time together, putting no energy into the relationship)
98
Constructive behaviors – help the relationship
Actively trying to improve the relationship (e.g., discussing problems, trying to change, going to a therapist)
99
Define fatal attractions
the very qualities that were so initially so attractive became the very reason as to why the relationship ended
100
Examples of Fatal Attraction
Ex: at first – “she’s so exciting and predictable;” and then – “I can never count on her” Ex: a woman attracted to an older man because he’s mature but then breaks up with him because he’s so much older and they have nothing in common
101
Breakees
-Were miserable Reported high levels of loneliness, depression, unhappiness, and anger Almost all reported experiencing physical disorders (i.e., headaches, stomachaches, eating and sleeping irregularities) in the weeks after the breakup as well
102
Breakers
Were the least upset Reported the lowest levels of pain and stress 39% reported the fewest physical symptoms However, breakers did report feeling guilty and unhappy
103
Mutuals
Were not as upset and hurt as breakees but were not as unaffected as breakers 60% of mutuals reported physical symptoms
104
REMAINING FRIENDS AFTER A BREAK-UP
Couples with higher rates of satisfaction and investment during the course of the relationship are more likely to remain friends after a break-up