Exam 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Brown and Mcneil

A

Better at remembering associated information than producing the actual word

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mangels

A

Patients with damage to the pre-frontal cortex had deficits in free and cued recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Content addressable memory

A

Ability to locate and access a complete memory using only a subset of the target’s attributes as a cue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Target memory trace

A

The particular memory we’re seeking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Activation level

A

the accessibility of the item

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Spreading activation

A

The automatic transmission of “energy” from one memory to related items

“Cat” may activate “milk”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Feature

A

Components that assemble memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Pattern completion

A

A feature that represents a memory spreads activation until that memory is retrieved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cue maintenance

A

Process of sustaining cues in working memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

interference resolution processes

A

Help resole interference from competing memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Post-retrieval monitoring

A

Is what we remembered what I wanted to remember?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cortical reinstatement

A

Activate hippocampal traces and binds features to memory outputs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Fernandez and Moscovitch

A

Words will interfere with encoding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Divided attention

A

Negatively affects retrieval success, especially sementic tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Encoding specificity principle

A

Retrieval cues are most effective when they are strongly related to the target

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Tulving and Osler

A

Cue words significantly increase target recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Anderson and Pritchert

A

Memory is influenced by the perspective taken at encoding and recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Explicit memory tests

A

Free recall, cued recall, recognition tests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Implicit memory tests

A

Repetition priming, cryptomnesia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Question cues

A

retrieval cues specific to the conditions under encoding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Environmental context-dependent memory

A

reinstaes the original encoding environment and facilitiates retrieval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Godden and Baddeley

A

Divers were tested, showed that memory retrieval is best in the learning environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Smith and Vela

A

Incidental context effects reduced if individual focuses inward rather than to the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Bouton and Moody

A

Renewal effect - return of fear in a new environment (after exposure therapy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
State dependency
Recall partially depends on the match between the learner's internal environment at encoding/retrieval
26
Mood-congruent memory
Recall easier when the emotional tone matches the current mood
27
Mood-dependent memory
Recall is dependent on the match in mood between encoding and retrieval
28
Eich, Macaulay, and Ryan
Free recall vastly improved when mood states matched
29
Marian and Neisser
Bilinguals have two language modes in which memories are stored
30
Reconstructive memory
Active and inferential process of retrieval whereby gaps in memory are filled in based on prior experience, logic, and goals
31
Dooling and Christiaansen
Memory may be reconstructed based on schemas | Helen keller cue resulted in reconstruction
32
Recognition memory
The ability to correctly decide whether one has previously encountered a stimulus in a particular context
33
Signal detection theory
A model for explaining recognition memory. Hits, correct rejections, false alarms, misses
34
Word frequency effect
Low frequency words are better recognized
35
Tulving
Remember/Know procedure where participants decide whether they recognize an item
36
Process dissociation procedure
A technique for parceling out the contributions of recollection and familiarity within a recognition task
37
Inclusion condition
Correct recognition = recollection +familiarity
38
Exlusion condition
Familiarity = false alarms in exlusion condition
39
Source monitoring
Examining the contextual origins of a memory
40
Misattribution error
misattribute their recollection from one source of another
41
Hyperthysmestic syndrome
uncontrollable remembering
42
Forgetting curve
Ebbinghaus, relationship betwen time and retention
43
Meeter, Murre, janssen
Recall for events shows a steep initial drop followed by a slower forgetting rate
44
Bahrick, Bahrick, and Wittlinger
Recall of personal material follows the forgetting curve
45
Bahrick
Permastore: memories become impervious to further forgetting
46
Availability
Whether or not an item is in the memory store
47
Accessibility
Whether the memory can be retrieved
48
trace decay
Gradual decay of memories resulting from the passage of time
49
Interference
When a cue becomes associated with other memories
50
Competition assumption
A cue activates all of its associates to some degree
51
Cue-overload principle
The tendency for recal to decrease with the number of to-be-remembered items paired with the same cue
52
Baddeley and Hitch
Forgetting was due to interference rather than trace decay | Rugby players and who they've played against
53
Part-set cuing impairment
target recall impaired by the provision of retrieval cues drawn from the same set of items
54
Slamecka
Providing competitor items reduced recall of the target item
55
Collaborative inhibition
tendency for groups to remember less material together than individually
56
Retrieval induced forgetting
tendency for the retrieval of some items to impair the recall of other related items
57
Associative blocking
When a cue fails to elicit a target because it elicits a stronger competitor
58
Strength-dependence
Interference should increase with the strength of the cue-competitor associated
59
Cue-dependence
Forgetting is related to the dominance of the cue-item association
60
Associative unlearning (melton and Irwin)
The bond linking a stimulus to a memory trace is punished after being retrieved inappropriately
61
Cue-dependence
the damage is done to the association between the cue and item
62
Inhibition
A reduction in the activity level of a contextually inappropriate response
63
Psychogenic Amnesia
Profound forgetting that is psychological in origin for major periods of one's life
64
Item-method directed forgetting (Basden and Basden)
Differences in encoding from either remembering or forgetting instructions
65
Encoding suppression process
Inhibit the prefrontal cortex on hippocampal processes
66
Gieselman, Bjork, Fishman
Forgetting appears on implicit tests (list-method directed forgetting)
67
Joslyn and Oakes
Forgetting instructions resulted in poorer memory | Diary
68
retrieval inhibition hypothesis
forget instructions reduces the activation of memories
69
Context shift hypothesis
Forget instructions may involve inhibition of inwanted text
70
Sahakyan and Kelley
Part of directed-forgetting effects arise from a shift in mental context
71
Behavioral control
Ability to initiate, discontinue, or prevent motor actions
72
Go/No-go task
measures inhibitory control (behavioral control)
73
Cognitive control
The ability to flexibly control thoughts in accordance with our goals
74
Think/No-think task
Measures inhibitory control over memory (cognitive control)
75
Anderson and Green
total control effect: control over memory yiels lasting retrieval positive control effect: reminders facilitate memories negative control effect: reminders with an intention to suppress inhibit memories
76