exam 3 Flashcards
what is assent and who gives it in research?
an agreement to participate in research - agreement of a child or adult to participate in the stud
What are the international standards for ethical research?
The Nuremberg Code
-Code emphasizes voluntary consent and contains guidelines related to protecting subjects from harm and balancing the benefits and risks of a study
-Qualified, ethical, beneficial, and credible
-Written in response to Nazi experiments
Which populations are considered vulnerable and require additional protection
people who are susceptible to coercion and influence - children, prisoners, economically/educationally disadvantaged
What are the four elements required for informed consent?
-disclosure
-the participant must comprehend the information
-the competence of the participant
-the persons voluntary agreement to be in the study
- researcher must DISCLOSE essential information
Coercion
overt threat of harm or excessive reward intentionally presented by one person to another to obtain compliance
ex: money, gift cards
Research Misconduct
The fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in processing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results.
Privacy
Freedom to determine the time, extent, and general circumstances under which private information will be shared with or withheld from others.
Confidentiality
Safe management of information or data shared by a participant to ensure that the data are kept private from others
Ethical Principle: Justice
fairness
right to fair treatment
right to privacy
Ethical Principle: Beneficence
promote good
right to protection from harm and discomfort
Ethical Principle: Autonomy
respect for persons
right to self-determination
right to full disclosure
questionnaires
are self-reported
-written
-verbal
-electronic
LOWER THAN 50% is a Poor Response Rate
Pros and Cons with Interviews
involves the participant
-structured: focused questions
-unstructured: ask participants to tell you something
Pros:
-the response rate improves
Cons: time-consuming and costly
Observational Measures
structured: records in categories that were observed like a checklist
unstructured: record sentences about what was observed like notes
reliability
consistency / precision
-test-retest reliability: more than one observer verifies it
-determines the measure of error or the scale that was used in the study
-If it is α > or equal to .80, it is CONSISTENT/reliable
Validity
extent to which an instrument reflects the concept being examined
-content validity
-construct validity
precision
comparable to reliability
degree of consistency or reproducibility of measurements made with physiological instruments
accuracy
comparable to validity
-did the instrument measure what it was supposed to measure ?
a nurse researcher is interested in the development of empathy in nursing students. Finding the lack of an appropriate instrument to use to study empathy in this population, the researcher has written a new instrument to gather data about the presence of empathy in nursing students.
What is the major construct of interest?
the major construct of interest for the new instrument is empathy
a nurse researcher is interested in the development of empathy in nursing students. Finding the lack of an appropriate instrument to use to study empathy in this population, the researcher has written a new instrument to gather data about the presence of empathy in nursing students.
what are the key questions the researcher needs to answer to confirm the instrument’s content validity?
The researcher needs to confirm how well the items on the instrument reflect the description of empathy in the literature, confirm the relevance of items on the instrument by content
experts’ evaluation, and examine potential subjects’ responses to the instrument’s items.
a nurse researcher is interested in the development of empathy in nursing students. Finding the lack of an appropriate instrument to use to study empathy in this population, the researcher has written a new instrument to gather data about the presence of empathy in nursing students.
what is the Cronbach alpha coefficient measure? was it considered strong?
internal reliability when there are multiple items on a scale 0.80 or higher is stronger
a nurse researcher is interested in the development of empathy in nursing students. Finding the lack of an appropriate instrument to use to study empathy in this population, the researcher has written a new instrument to gather data about the presence of empathy in nursing students.
which type of procedure would be used to assess the stability of the new instrument
Stability is usually measured using test-retest reliability. It is concerned with the consistency
of repeated measures of the construct. Using this technique requires an assumption that the factor
to be measured (in this case, empathy) remains the same at the two testing times and that any
change in the value or score is a consequence of random error
a nurse researcher is interested in the development of empathy in nursing students. Finding the lack of an appropriate instrument to use to study empathy in this population, the researcher has written a new instrument to gather data about the presence of empathy in nursing students.
What would a test-retest reliability value of 0.85 represent for the newly developed instrumen
A value of 0.85 is very solid test-retest reliability for the new scale, indicating that it is
consistently measuring empathy with repeat testing and recognizing that students’ level of empathy
varies somewhat over time
a nurse researcher is interested in the development of empathy in nursing students. Finding the lack of an appropriate instrument to use to study empathy in this population, the researcher has written a new instrument to gather data about the presence of empathy in nursing students.
What information would the researcher share in a published report about the development of this
new instrument
The researcher would describe the theoretical consideration that went into the
development of the instrument and discuss the facts about the instrument, including what type
instrument it is, scaling, length, readability, scoring, and interpretation of results. Then the researcher
would summarily describe each assessment conducted to provide evidence of the instrument’s
validity and reliability. At the minimum in this scenario, this would include assessment of test-retest
reliability and homogeneity, computing the Cronbach’s alphas for each, and at least one measure of
convergence, using an available instrument measuring empathy or a similar concept.
critical appraisal should be a(n)
balanced appraisal of a study’s strengths and weaknesses
3 steps of critically appraising a study
- identifying the steps of the research process in studies
- determining the study’s strengths and weaknesses
- evaluating the credibility and meaning of study findings
-interpretation of findings
-limitations
-conclusions
critical appraising guidelines for each section of a research article
apply the guidelines to be able to critique research articles
- writing quality
- title
- authors
- abstract
- research problem - why is this an issue
- purpose - does it clarify what the study is about
- literature review
- framework or theoretical perspective
- research objectives, questions, or hypothesis
- variables
-demographics, independent, dependent, research variables or concepts, conceptual and operational definitions - research design
- sample
- setting
- measurement
-strategies used, scales and questionnaires, observation, interviews, physiological measures, adequacy of measures, validity and reliability - data collection
-how, who, is it ethical ?? - data analysis
-procedures, statistical significance??