Exam 2: Research Control - Internal and External Validitiy Flashcards

1
Q

What is rigor?

A

rigorous adherence to rules, procedures, and techniques during research.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how do researchers ensure adequate rigor?

A
  • understand rules and procedures
  • understand approaches
  • adhere to methods
  • inform others about problems and limitations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are 4 issues of rigor in quantitative designs?

A
  1. quality of design
  2. quality of instrument
  3. rigor of procedure
  4. adequacy of sample
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are 3 issues of rigor in qualitative designs?

A
  1. depth and comprehension of data obtained.
  2. procedures used to engage with participants
  3. reflexivity and analysis of themes.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does measurement mean in quantitative research?

A

translating what has been observed into numerical values.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what does validity mean in quantitative research?

A
  • establishing the strength of a relationship between a measurement indicator and the underlying concept
  • are we measuring what we say we’re measuring?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does reliability mean in quantitative research?

A
  • the consistency of the measures.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are some criteria for choosing a good instrument? (3)

A
  • is it widely used?
  • does procedure fit the study?
  • is there info. on reliability and validity of scores?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 4 levels of measurement?

A
  1. Nominal
  2. ordinal
  3. interval
  4. ratio
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is nominal measurement?

A
  • Categorical
  • describes traits or characteristics
  • no ranking of data.
  • gender, ethnicity, religion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is an ordinal measurement?

A
  • Categorical
  • data ranked from smallest to largest
  • interval between data may not be equal
  • rating scale: strong agree, agree, etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is an Interval measurement?

A
  • continuous
  • equal intervals bt data categories
  • date, temperature
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a Ratio measurement

A
  • continuous
  • interval scale with an absolute zero
  • weight, income
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

T/F: Categorical data can’t compute in addition, subtraction, multiplication, division.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Name an example of an interval instrument

A
  • equal spacing bt measures
  • purdue pegboard test
  • focus on speed of performance
  • does not start with zero point
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

name an example of a ratio instrument

A
  • scale beings with absolute zero

- grip test: start at zero to grip strength

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Reliability

A

-consistency of an instrument
- degree to which random error exists in instrument
O (observed score) = T (true score) + E (error score)
R = .80 or above is acceptable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Threats to reliability

A
  • random error

- i.e. misreading questionnaire, observer interprets incorrectly, fatigue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Types of reliability (3)

A
  • stability
  • internal consistency
  • equivalence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Stability

A

test-retest; consistency of repeated measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

internal consistency

A

test homogenity; uses split half consistency ( split test in half; evens/odds)

22
Q

equivalence

A

agreement bt two measurement events; inter-rater, alternate forms, etc.

23
Q

Validity

A

What is being measured true to the concept

24
Q

What are two threats to validity?

A
  • systematic bias
  • non-random error
    less systematic error = more validity
25
Internal validity
are we measuring what we want to measure/manipulate?
26
external validity
generalizability; can we generalize our study to larger population
27
What are the 3 types of validity?
1. construct 2. content 3. criterion
28
Construct validity
how the instrument is designed; independence, happiness, etc
29
Content validity
how the assessment covers the relevant information
30
criterion validity
predictive validity; how it can predict the outcome.
31
Ways of strengthening internal validity designs (4)
1. randomization 2. homogenity 3. matching characteristics 4. stratification; separate by gender
32
Ways of strengthening external validity
- replication
33
What are the 4 criteria for merits of trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry
- credibility - transferability - dependability - confirmability
34
Name the Truth value criterion in qualitative and quantitative approach
- credibility | - internal validity
35
name the applicability criterion in qualitative and quantitative approach
- transferability | - external validity
36
name the consistency criterion in qualitative and quantitative approach
- dependability | - reliability
37
name the neutrality criterion in qualitative and quantitative approach
- confirmability | - objectivity
38
Credibility
- true value | - are informants believable
39
transferability
- applicability | - can this be repeated in a different situation
40
dependability
- consistency | - can the findings be repeated if replicated
41
confirmability
- neutrality of data
42
Methods to enhance trustworthiness
- prolonged (breadth) and persistent engagement (depth) - time sampling - reflexivity - triangulation
43
time sampling
sample all possible situations, times, and groups
44
reflexivity
diary, notes, peer interview, group participation
45
triangulation
convergence of multiple perspectives to ensure all aspects have been investigated
46
member checking
ask participants to review and react to study data
47
structural coherence
analysis to explain contradictions
48
audit trails
review process notes, raw data
49
sources of bias in qualitative research
- researcher presence - over reliance on accessible participants - influence of participants and site on researcher
50
procedural challenges
- entering study site - establishing rapport and respect - balancing professionalism and familiarity with participants