Exam 2: Ch 4-7 Flashcards
Most psychological research on the trait approach relies on _____ studies
correlational
T/F: Trait approach is based on ratio rather than ordinal scales
False: The trait approach is based on ordinal scales
Person-situation debate
Asks the following question:
Which is more important in determining what people do: the person or the situation?
Situationism
The idea that situation predominately determines behavior
Single-Trait Approach
Examines link between personality and behavior by asking, “What do people that are [that single trait] do?”
Many-Trait Approach
Asks “Who does that?” - the reverse of the question for singe-trait. Researchers determine which traits correlate with specific behaviors and then see to explain the pattern of correlations
Essential-Trait Approach
“Which traits are most important?”
Typological Approach
Considers people to be too qualitatively different to compare them all on the same trait dimensions. Goal is to identify groups are people similar enough in traits and behaviors that they can be considered all part of the same “type”
High self-monitors
People who are very different between their inner and outer selves and in how they perform in different settings
Low self-monitors
People who are largely the same inside and out, and do not vary much from one setting to another
Narcissism
Excessive self-love, so extreme that is can be classified as a personality disorder.
Although charming at first, it usually wears off and the person is manipulative, overbearing, entitled, vain, arrogant, and exhibitionistic.
Causes of Narcissism
Extreme sensitivity to rejections/exclusion. Failure to control impulses and delay gratification,
California Q-set
Example of the Many-Trait Approach
Set of 100 traits/phrases to which the subject agrees or disagrees. The rater then sorts the phrases into categories 1-9, 1 being highly uncharacteristic and 9 being highly characteristic (forced distribution because each category must have a specific number of items). This forces the judges to compare all items directly against each other
LIWC
Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: calculates the number of words that appear in each of a long list of categories, like “certainty words”
Jack and Jean Block’s Study
Assessed the personalities of preschoolers, then reassessed them 20 years later on their political beliefs, and scored them on a scale of liberal to conservative.
California F Scale
Measures the basic antidemocratic psychological orientation that is the suspected common foundation of intense racial prejudices.
An example of the many-trait approach
Pseudoconservativism
A pathological version of political conservativism that is motivated by one’s desire for security/”the usual”
Describe the major issue/bias in the examination of the correlation between political beliefs and personality
Most personality psychologists are liberals, so there is a built-in readiness to conclude that conservatives are flawed in some way.
Thematic Apperception Test
Henry Murray’s List of 20 “needs” that he described as central to the understanding of personality. He theorized this list
Jack and Jeanne Block’s Two Essential Characteristics of Personality
“Ego resilience” = psychological adjustment
“Ego control” = impulse control
Individuals high in ego resilience can adjust their level of control based on the circumstances.
“Undercontrol gets one into trouble, but resilience gets one out of it”
Undercontrolled individuals
Tend to act immediately upon impulses
Hans Eysenck’s 3 essential personality traits
Extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism
Auke Tellegen’s three “superfactors”
Positive emotionality, negative emotionality, and constraint
Roughly parallel, but better defined than Eysenck’s essential traits
Lexical hypothesis
The important aspects of human life will be labeled, and if something is truly important and universal, many words for it will exist in all languages
Openness to Experience
Sometimes called culture/intellect. High scorers are creative, imaginative, open-minded, and clever. Also more likely to be liberal, use drugs, and play an instrument
Agreeableness
Measures one’s tendency to be cooperative. Looks at conformity, compliance, likeability.
High scorers tend to be compassionate and polite, although may be push-overs
Conscientiousness
Comprises being dutiful, careful, rule-abiding, and ambitious.
High scorers are trusted in the workplace, do as they are told, and do not steal. They are usually good drivers but carry a lot of car insurance –> They avoid risks and seek to protect themselves just in case
Neuroticism
May also be called “negative emotionality”.
High scorers tend to deal ineffectively with problems and react more negatively to stressful events. They are sensitive to social threats and more likely to be unhappy, anxious, and even physically sick. They complain more frequently than low scorers
Convergent validation
When several reliable sources all point to the same conclusion
The Trait Approach
Assumes that individuals differ in their characteristic patterns of thought, feeling, and behavior. Such patterns are called traits.
Person-Situation Debate
Controversy over whether it is worthwhile to characterize people in terms of their traits, considering how inconsistent people are.
Situationists vs Personality Theorists
Situationist arguments
Behavior is mainly determined by one’s situation. Three specific arguments:
1 - Ability of traits to predict behavior is extremely limited
2 - The situations are more important than personality traits in determining what people do
3 - Not only is personality assessment a waste of time, but also many of people’s intuitions about each other are fundamentally wrong
Upper limit for predictability of behaviors based on personality traits
0.4
A quite low upper limit
Walter Mischel
Published Personality and Assessment in 1968. Argued that behavior is too inconsistent across situations to allow individual differences to be characterized accurately in terms of broad personality traits.
Mischel is considered, to a certain degree, to have kicked off the person-situation debate
Absolute evaluation of the .40 correlation
Requires calculation of how many correct and incorrect predictions of behavior a trait measurement with this degree of validity would yield.
Use BESD to do so
Relative evaluation of the .40 correlation
Compare this degree of predictability for personality traits with the accuracy of other methods (specifically, the predictability power of situational variables)
Strong vs Weak Situations
Strong situations command people to behave a certain way (there will almost always be a select few individuals, however, that do not conform due to STRONG personality traits).
Weak situations allow for more flexibility in the way that people behave.
Fundamental Attribution Error
Tendency of humans to make assumptions about one’s personality based on their actions, largely disregarding the situation. Often brief, biased, and limited