Exam 2 Flashcards
Decks 1,2,3,4, 5.1 so far
Upstream and downstream determinants of population health
Bottom -> Top
Individual, pop health Genetic factors Individual risk factor Social relationship Living conditions Neighborhoods and communities Institutions Social and Economic policies
“Population health”
Health outcomes of a group of individuals
Distribution of outcomes within group
Importance and management of non-clinical factors (social, economic, environmental) in outcomes
Examples of “population”
Hospital or pharmacy catchment area
Student population
Employer’s workers
County, state, or country
Disparities
inequalities within a population
Distinguish between associating from causality
lower income = poorer health
educated people = better health
these are associations or correlations but not necessarily one causing other
SDOH
Social Determinants of Health
Many are modifiable factors
Policies and Programs
Policies influence health outcomes and/or have influence on determinants/factors
ie. School breakfast program for low-income children
Violent mortality (guns) and transportation mortality (cars)
Theory for increase violence 1990s
Lead in gasoline and paint, rose and fell 25 years prior
caused issues in kids like reduced IQ, learning disabilities, hyperactive/antisocial behaviros
Why have transportation mortality rates decreased?
increasing focus on safety like seat belts, airbags, antilock breaks, better highway design, Drunk driving is a no no
Effect of Income and Education
They matter, strongly associated with poor/fair health status.
More money/ higher ed the overall better health.
Less money/less ed overall worse outcomes
Infant mortality also tied to Ed of mother
Affect life expectancy too
Hispanic Paradox
Recent immigrants have less diabetes and other health problems than those who had longer exposure to our “toxic socioeconomic and physical environment”
Expanded Chronic Care Model
Incorporating the principles of health promotion and the focus on the determinants of health as directed by a population health approach enables the Chronic Care Model to be used by the entire team in an integrated way.
Community:
Build Health Public Policy
Create Supportive Environments
Strengthen Community Action
Health System: Self-Management/Develop Personal skills Delivery system Design/ Reorient Health services Decision Support Info systems
Activated community and Prepared Proactive community partners
Chronic Care Model
Healthcare system: Self-management support Delivery System support Decision support Clinical Info support
Community:
Resources and policy
Health Definition (WHO)
Health is a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity
Health Promotion
Actions affecting one or more determinants of health
Goal to enable people to maintain or improve their physical, mental, or social well-being.
By promoting health, disease may be prevented
Health promotion does not = treatment of disease
Levels of Health Promotions
Individual - own education, income
Community - environment, school, accessibility of essential services
State - laws by state legislature
National - grant program improve local service
Global - org that do global response to crises
Community Level interventions
Goal and Rationale: an individuals immediate environment can enable or inhibit health behaviors
Target ex: community infrastructure
Intervention ex: improve park, safe neighborhoods
Outcomes and eval ex: Obesity rate, teen violence
State and National Level interventions
Goal and Rationale: resource allocations or regulations can improve community infrastructure or services
Target ex: infrastructure or services
Interventions ex: budgets and grant programs improving infrastructure, law restricting pollution
Outcome and Eval ex: quantity and quality of park, bike trail, drinking water and air quality
Global Level interventions
Goal and Rationale: prevent illness or injury
Target ex: imported products, including toys, foods and meds
Interventions ex: trade agreements, regulations, quality standards manufacturing
Outcome and eval ex: reduced exposure to contaminated product, fewer reports of defective
Health Promotion and Disease prevention
Health promotion = optimize overall health
Disease prevention = reduce occurrence and impact of specific diseases
3 Levels of disease prevention
Primary, secondary and Tertiary
Primary Prevention
Goal: To reduce number of new cases
Target pop: those most likely to be exposed or can increase their resistance
Secondary Prevention
Goal: reduce number of new cases (mostly among those expose) or reduce number of severe cases
Target pop: Those who’ve been exposed or have early symptoms of disease
Tertiary Prevention
Goals: Reduce number of complications and death
Target pop: those who have and need treatment
Healthly people
US national agenda that communicates a vision for improving health and achieving health equity
Measurable objectives within distinct topic areas
subset of objectives designated as Leading Health Indicators
Every 10 years, Ie 2020 came out in 2010
Healthy people evolution
More ambitious over time and more broad going beyond the medical/ clinical
Social Determinants of Health
ED access and quality Healthcare Access and quality Neighborhood and Built environment Social and Community context Economic Stability
WHO 1998 Health definition
a DYNAMIC state of complete physical, mental, SPIRITUAL, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity
Public Health is..
what we as a society do collectively to assure the conditions in which people can be healthy
Medicine vs public Health
Saves 1 life at a time vs millions at a time
10 Great US Public Health Achievements
Vaccinations Safer Workplace Safer and healthier food Motor Vehicle Safety Control of infectious diseases Decline in deaths from coronary heart disease and stroke Family planning Recognition of tobacco use as a health hazard Healthier mothers and babies Fluoridation of drinking water
10 Essential Services of public Health
monitor health status diagnose and investigate inform, educate and empower mobilize community partnership develop policies and plans encore laws and regulations link people to need services/assure care Assure a competent workforce evaluate health services research
CDC
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Mission: to promote health and quality of life by preventing and controlling disease, injury, and disability
Surveillance (active/passive), guidelines, grants to states and non-profits
Code of Ethics Pharmacists VII
A pharmacist serves individual, community, and societal needs
Traditional vs Behavioral “nudges” Economics
Traditional = Assumes we know what is best for ourselves and act that way….rational decisions
Behavioral = assumes we don’t always know what is best for ourselves. We make automatic decisions, so lets try to maximize pools well-being by structuring choices
“Nudging” to promote health choices
Food/menu labels - information plus
Health choice is the easy one - change the default
Financial incentive
Social norms and framing
Traffic Light Labels
Green - consume often
Yellow - Consume less often
Red - Theres a better choice in green or yellow
Study found that this works and led to sustained healthier choices
Specialty meds
Account for a lot of the spending increases we see
Generics capture…
80% of a brands volume within 6 months
Policies aimed at encouraging generic entry have gotten stronger
New Drug Therapy Starts
people who are starting therapy are more likely to be started on a generic than a brand now.
Generics make up…
90% of prescriptions dispensed, dispensed 97% of the time when available
Hurdles for Generic drugs
take time for price to come down after generic released
Patent holders try to block generic entries through different means
Evergreening
Generic makers want to come in lower, but not too low
Some drugs hard to duplicate
Evergreening
When brand-drug gets patents on “new inventions” that are merely slight modifications fo their older drugs - with little therapeutic gain, and a lot of economic gain for them
Price Gouging
Legal business behavior, widely criticized as unethical
Company find cheap, old drug, make sure they have monopoly on it and jack up price
1983 Orphan Drug Act (ODA)
intended to incentivize development of drugs to treat rare and neglected diseases
gave a bunch of financial perks, extended monopoly
drugs that have no expectation of being profitable
Recycling
Finding old cheap drug that is already being used off label for an orphan condition, buy that drug production, run a trial, get orphan statues then increase price alot
Unapproved uses
Get orphan approval and all incentives that come with it but then actually sell the drug to treat other common conditions
Salami slicing
narrowly sub typing a disease or condition as finely as possible, in order to sell the drug to each disease subtype for the seven years of exclusivity
Changes who pays for RX
fewer scripts are on commercial or cash plans
Increase in exchange plans, Medicare Part D, Medicaid in expansion states and Medicaid in non-expansion states
Pharma spending
Spends considerably more for Sales/ Marketing compared to Research/Development
Big Pharma Changes
Alot of outsourcing
Product lines are less exciting
Challenges presented by globalization supply chain
more dispersed facilities supplying global market
increase volume of imported products
more outsourcing of manufacturing
Greater complexity in supply chains
Imports from countries with less developed regulatory systems
Greater opportunities for economic fraud
FDA Foreign Offices
All over the world
supposed to ensure GMP
Drug Manufacturer
Develops and produces med
Sells med to wholesaler
Negotiates with PBM
Markets med to patient and to physicians via free samples, etc
Repackaging
Med sold in bulk can be repackaged into smaller containers then sent to pharmacy
Wholesaler = Distributor
Purchase med in bulk from manufacturer
Sends med to repackager
Sells meds to pharmacies and healthcare institutions
Pharmacy
Buy from wholesaler
dispenses med to patients
stocks med based on variety of info
Drug samples
Provided free to doctor
Doctor cant sell or trade samples
Doctors and Dispensing Doctors
diagnose and monitor patients
Prescribe med, can give free samples
Decisions can be influenced
Patient (insured)
pays premium
Pays cost sharing of drug
Pharmacy Benefit Mangers
Develops and maintains formulary based on cost-effectiveness
Essentially hired by insurance company
Works as the middle man
Types of Emergencies
Natural disasters, disease outbreaks, man made ( radiation release or terrorist attacks)
Natural disasters costs US more than terrorist attacks
Levels of approaches to Emergency planning
National/Federal/US:
FEMA (under Dept of HS)
DHHS (CDC, ASPR, SNS)
State level:
MEMA (Mass emergency Mgmt Agency)
Mass Dept of Public Health
Institutional:
Hospitals, community pharmacies, uni, etc
Individual
SNS
Strategic National Stockpile
Under Dept of Health Human Services DHHS
created due to “Y2K”
has meds, vaccines, antidotes, medical and surgical supplies
help is requested by the states
free to areas in need
CHEMPACKs
forward placed in locations throughout US, mostly at hospitals and fire stations
done for quick access to nerve agent antidotes in the event of a nerve agent attack or chemical accident that overwhelms local resources
12-Hour push packages
rapid delivery to anywhere in US within 12 hrs of federal decision to deploy them
Apportionment
Breaking up the materials at RSS into smaller packages for individual deliveries
Managed Inventory
these are as-needed and as-requested, especially when threat is known
SNS Request flow
Local -> State -> national + help flows back
SNS does not include
routine maintenance medications, such as high blood pressure meds
Medication to treat adverse reactions to vaccines or emergency medications
Supplies to support the EDS staff, such as water or sanitation supplies
- more medical materials can be purchased and supplied by SNS to states for specific situations *
High water mark
must consider what their max population is.
ex. school in session, colleges/universities, homeless, seasonal workers, etc
SNS prioritize
First responders (Fire, police, EMS)
Strategic personal (Transport, utilities)
Family members of the above
Some special populations
SNS special populations
Long-term care facilities, rest homes, nursing homes
Correctional facilites
Organize w/ special populations leadership to pick up medications at designated EDS for assisted living centers and group homes
Emergency Dispensing: Local planning team include
Local public health Emergency management directors various reserve teams and committees Fire/police Local/Regional hospitals
Role of Pharmacists
Public-health-level activities
Pharmacy-level activities
Community-Based Pharmacy Disaster plans
make plans before an emergency happens
minimize impact on the pharmacy itself
Managing effects of disaster on supply chain
ID in advance the essential supplies required to maintain critical pharmacy operations
Evaluate supply logistics and ID potential alternate sources of supplies
Ensure that institution or community pharmacy is in accordance with state and national priorities
Staffing issues in pharmacy with disaster
expect some work force reduction
solutions:
develop policies for flexible work sites, cross-training employees, ID business functions that can be outsourced
Pharmacists preparing their community for disaster
ensure patients have adequate supply of medication
work with local physicians; educate MDs on refill policies
Individual Pharmacist Responsibilities for disaster
Training for pharmacists such as CPR, basic cardiac life support, vaccination certification
Train other health professionals and volunteer
Emergency Prescription Assistance Program
EPAP
US DHHS and FEMA
For uninsured people with proof of prescription, in a disaster
Provides eligible individuals 30-day prescription assistance
Rx open
Mapping pharmacy status during disasters